Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Traditional economic theories stress the relevance of political, institutional, geographic, and historical factors for economic growth. In contrast, human-capital theories suggest that peoples’ competences, mediated by technological progress, are the deciding factor in a nation’s wealth. Using three large-scale assessments, we calculated cognitive-competence sums for the mean and for upper- and lower-level groups for 90 countries and compared the influence of each group’s intellectual ability on gross domestic product. In our cross-national analyses, we applied different statistical methods (path analyses, bootstrapping) and measures developed by different research groups to various country samples and historical periods. Our results underscore the decisive relevance of cognitive ability—particularly of an intellectual class with high cognitive ability and accomplishments in science, technology, engineering, and math—for national wealth. Furthermore, this group’s cognitive ability predicts the quality of economic and political institutions, which further determines the economic affluence of the nation. Cognitive resources enable the evolution of capitalism and the rise of wealth.

Keywords

cognitive ability cross-cultural differences educational measurement intelligence TIMSS PISA PIRLS STEM

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barro

R. J.

(1991). Economic growth in a cross-section of countries. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, 407–443.

Becker

G. S.

(1993). Human capital. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1964)

Benhabib

Spiegel

(1994). The role of human capital in economic development: Evidence from aggregate cross-country data. Journal of Monetary Economics, 34, 143–173.

Deary

I. J.

Batty

G. D.

Gale

C. R.

(2008). Childhood intelligence predicts voter turnout, voting preferences, and political involvement in adulthood. Intelligence, 36, 548–555.

Florida

(2002). The rise of the creative class. New York, NY: Basic Books.

Gelade

G. A.

(2008). IQ, cultural values, and the technological achievement of nations. Intelligence, 36, 711–718.

Gottfredson

L. S.

(2004). Life, death, and intelligence. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 4, 23–46.

Gwartney

Lawson

(2003). Economic freedom of the world: 2003 annual report. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: Fraser Institute.

Hanushek

E. A.

Woessmann

(2009). Do better schools lead to more growth? Cognitive skills, economic outcomes, and causation (Discussion Paper No. 4575). Retrieved from Institute for the Study of Labor Web site: http://ftp.iza.org/dp4575.pdf

10.

Hayek

F. A. V.

(1994). The road to serfdom. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1944)

11.

Heckman

J. J.

(2000). Policies to foster human capital. Research in Economics, 54, 3–56.

12.

Hunt

Wittmann

(2008). National intelligence and national prosperity. Intelligence, 36, 1–9.

13.

Jones

Schneider

W. J.

(2006). Intelligence, human capital, and economic growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 11, 71–93.

14.

Kurian

G. T.

(2001). The illustrated book of world rankings. Armonk, NY: Sharpe.

15.

La Griffe du Lion . (2002). The smart fraction theory of IQ and the wealth of nations. Retrieved from http://www.lagriffedulion.f2s.com/sft.htm

16.

Landes

D. S.

(1990). Why are we so rich and they so poor? American Economic Review, 80, 1–13.

17.

Landes

D. S.

(1998). The wealth and poverty of nations. New York, NY: Norton.

18.

Lynn

Vanhanen

(2002). IQ and the wealth of nations. Westport, CT: Praeger.

19.

Mises

L. V.

(2005). Liberalism. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund. (Original work published 1927)

20.

Murray

(2002). IQ and income inequality in a sample of sibling pairs from advantaged family backgrounds. American Economic Review, 92, 339–343.

21.

Murray

(2003). Human accomplishment. New York, NY: Harper-Collins.

22.

Muthén

L. K.

Muthén

B. O.

(2008). Mplus (Version 5.21) [Computer software]. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

23.

Nelson

R. R.

Phelps

E. S.

(1966). Investment in humans, technological diffusion, and economic growth. American Economic Review, 56, 69–75.

24.

Nobel Prize Committee. (2005). All Nobel prizes. Retrieved from http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/lists/all

25.

O’Driscoll

G. P.

Jr. Holmes

K. R.

O’Grady

M. A.

(Eds.). (2002). 2002 index of economic freedom. Washington, DC: Heritage Foundation; New York, NY: The Wall Street Journal.

26.

Park

Lubinski

Benbow

C. P.

(2008). Ability differences among people who have commensurate degrees matter for scientific creativity. Psychological Science, 19, 957–961.

27.

Pritchett

Viarengo

(2009). Producing superstars for the economic Mundial: The Mexican predicament with quality of education. In Hausmann

Austin

E. L.

Mia

(Eds.), The Mexico competitiveness report 2009 (pp. 71–89). Geneva, Switzerland: World Economic Forum; Boston, MA: Harvard University.

28.

R Development Core Team. (2008). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org

29.

Rindermann

(2007). The big G-factor of national cognitive ability. European Journal of Personality, 21, 767–787.

30.

Rindermann

(2008). Relevance of education and intelligence at the national level for the economic welfare of people. Intelligence, 36, 127–142.

31.

Rindermann

Ceci

S. J.

(2009). Educational policy and country outcomes in international cognitive competence studies. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 551–568.

32.

Rindermann

Heller

K. A.

(2005). The benefit of gifted classes and talent schools for developing students’ competences and enhancing academic self-concept. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 19, 133–136.

33.

Rindermann

Meisenberg

(2009). Relevance of education and intelligence at the national level for health: The case of HIV and AIDS. Intelligence, 37, 383–395.

34.

Rindermann

Sailer

Thompson

(2009). The impact of smart fractions, cognitive ability of politicians and average competence of peoples on social development. Talent Development and Excellence, 1, 3–25.

35.

Romer

P. M.

(1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98, S71–S102.

36.

Schumpeter

J. A.

(1939). Business cycles: A theoretical, historical, and statistical analysis of the capitalist process. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

37.

Smith

(1994). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. New York, NY: Modern Library. (Original work published 1776)

38.

Solow

R. M.

(1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70, 65–94.

39.

Weiss

(2009). National IQ means transformed from PISA scores. Journal of Social, Political and Economic Studies, 34, 71–94.

40.

World Intellectual Property Organization. (2011). Patent applications by patent office (1883-2009) by resident and non-resident. In Statistics on patents. Retrieved from www.wipo.int/ipstats/en/statistics/patents

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.06 MB

Cognitive Capitalism

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material