DittoP. H.LopezD. F. (1992). Motivated skepticism: The use of differential decision criteria for preferred and nonpreferred conclusions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 568–584.
2.
DunningD.LeuenbergerA.ShermanD. A. (1995). A new look at motivated inference: Are self-serving theories of success a product of motivational forces?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 58–68.
3.
KundaZ. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480–498.
4.
LordC. G.RossL.LepperM. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2098–2109.
5.
PyszczynskiT.GreenbergJ. (1987). Toward an integration of cognitive and motivational perspectives on social inference: A biased hypothesis-testing model. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 20, pp. 297–340). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
6.
ShermanD. K.CohenG. L. (2002). Accepting threatening information: Self-affirmation and the reduction of defensive biases. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 119–123.
7.
TetlockP. E.LeviA. (1982). Attribution bias: On the inconclusiveness of the cognition-motivation debate. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 68–88.
