Language function in patients with impaired declarative memory presents a compelling opportunity to investigate the inter-dependence of memory and language in referential communication. We examined amnesic patients’ use of definite references during a referential communication task. Discursively, definite references can be used to mark a referent as situationally unique (e.g., “the game,” as in the case of a recently publicized game) or as shared information (e.g., “the game,” as in one discussed previously). We found that despite showing normal collaborative learning after repeated referring—as indexed by consistent and increasingly efficient descriptive labels for previously unfamiliar tangram figures—amnesic patients did not consistently use definite references in referring to those figures. The use of definite references seems to be critically dependent on declarative memory, and the engagement of such memory is signaled by language.
AghaA. (2007). Language and social relations. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
2.
AllenJ.S.TranelD.BrussJ.DamasioH. (2006). Correlations between regional brain volumes and memory performance in anoxia. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 28, 457–476.
BrennanS.E.ClarkH.H. (1996). Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1482–1493.
5.
CavacoS.AndersonS.W.AllenJ.S.Castro-CaldasA.DamasioH. (2004). The scope of preserved procedural memory in amnesia. Brain, 127, 1853–1867.
6.
ClarkH.H. (1992). Arenas of language use. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
7.
ClarkH.H.MarshallC.R. (1981). Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In JoshiA.K.WebberB.L.SagI.A. (Eds.), Elements of discourse understanding (pp. 10–63). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
8.
ClarkH.H.Wilkes-GibbsD. (1986). Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 22, 1–39.
9.
ClarkH.H.Wilkes-GibbsD. (1992). Referring as a collaborative process. In ClarkH.H., Arenas of language use (pp. 107–143). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
10.
CohenN.J.EichenbaumH. (1993). Memory, amnesia and the hippocampal system. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11.
DuffM.C.HengstJ.TengsheC.KremaA.TranelD.CohenN.J. (2008). Hippocampal amnesia disrupts the flexible use of procedural discourse in social interaction. Aphasiology, 22, 866–880.
12.
DuffM.C.HengstJ.TranelD.CohenN.J. (2006). Development of shared information in communication despite hippocampal amnesia. Nature Neuroscience, 9, 140–146.
13.
DuffM.C.HengstJ.TranelD.CohenN.J. (2007). Talking across time: Using reported speech as a communicative resource in amnesia. Aphasiology, 21, 702–716.
14.
DuffM.C.HengstJ.TranelD.CohenN.J. (2008). Collaborative discourse facilitates efficient communication and new semantic learning in amnesia. Brain & Language, 106, 41–54.
15.
DuffM.C.HengstJ.TranelD.CohenN.J. (2009). Hippocampal amnesia disrupts verbal play and the creative use of language in social interaction. Aphasiology, 23, 926–939.
16.
DuffM.C.WszalekT.TranelD.CohenN.J. (2008). Successful life outcome and management of real-world memory demands despite profound anterograde amnesia. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 30, 931–945.
17.
EichenbaumH.CohenN.J. (2001). From conditioning to conscious recollection: Memory systems of the brain. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
18.
GarrodS.PickeringM.J. (2004). Why is conversation so easy?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 8–11.
HanksW.F. (1990). Referential practice. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
21.
HengstJ. (2003). Collaborative referencing between individuals with aphasia and routine communication partners. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 831–848.
22.
MacKayD.G.BurkeD.M.StewartR. (1998). H.M.’s language production deficits: Implications for relations between memory, semantic binding, and the hippocampal system. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 28–69.
23.
MeyersJ.MeyersK. (1995). Rey Complex Figure Test and Recognition Trial: Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
24.
MilnerB.SquireL.R.KandelE.R. (1998). Cognitive neuroscience and the study of memory. Neuron, 20, 445–468.
25.
SchmidtM. (1996). Rey Auditory and Verbal Learning Test: A handbook. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
26.
TranelD.DamasioA. (2002). Neurobiological foundations of human memory. In BaddeleyA.D.KopelmanM.D.WilsonB.A. (Eds.), The handbook of memory disorders (2nd ed., pp. 17–56). Chichester, England: Wiley.
