Frequency-of-occurrence effects (e.g., effects of word frequency or familiarity) are widely thought to arise through differences in resting levels of activation in localist input-output modules. A different account posits that these effects at least partially reflect the strength of connections between various localist modules. Given that Arabic numerals appear more frequently than their alphabetic counterparts, we contrasted reaction times to stimuli in both formats in a naming/reading-aloud task and a parity-judgment task. The script effect (the difference between reaction times to Arabic and to alphabetic formats) was large in the parity-judgment task but absent in the naming/reading-aloud task. This script-by-task interaction follows naturally from the idea that at least part of the effect of frequency of occurrence of a printed word or digit (and other instances of familiarity) resides in the strength of connections between specialized localist input-output modules and a localist semantic module. This conclusion is likely applicable across a variety of domains.
AndersonJ.R. (1993). Rules of the mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2.
BaayenR.H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
3.
BaayenR.H.DavidsonD.J.BatesD.M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390–412.
4.
BaayenR.H.PiepenbrockR.GulikersL. (1995). The CELEX lexical database [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium.
5.
BalotaD.A.AbramsR.A. (1995). Mental chronometry: Beyond onset latencies in the lexical decision task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1289–1302.
6.
BalotaD.A.ChumbleyJ.I. (1985). The locus of word frequency effects in the pronunciation task: Lexical access and/or production?Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 89–106.
7.
BesnerD.SmithM.C. (1992). Models of visual word recognition: When obscuring the stimulus yields a clearer view. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 468–482.
8.
BorowskyR.BesnerD. (1993). Visual word recognition: A multi-stage activation model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 815–840.
9.
BruceV.YoungA. (1986). Understanding face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 77, 305–327.
10.
CampbellJ.I.ParkerH.R.DoetzelN.L. (2004). Interactive effects of numerical surface form and operand parity in cognitive arithmetic. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 51–64.
11.
ColtheartM. (1987). Deep dyslexia: A right hemisphere hypothesis. In ColtheartM.PattersonK.MarshallJ.C. (Eds.), Deep dyslexia (2nd ed., pp. 326–380). New York, NY: Routledge.
12.
ColtheartM. (2004). Are there lexicons?Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 1153–1171.
13.
ColtheartM.RastleK.PerryC.LangdonR.ZieglerJ.C. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204–256.
14.
DehaeneS.BossiniS.GirauxP. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 371–396.
15.
DehaeneS.MehlerJ. (1992). Cross-linguistic regularities in the frequency of number words. Cognition, 43, 1–29.
16.
ForsterK.I.ChambersS.M. (1973). Lexical access and naming time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 627–635.
17.
GöbelS.M.SnowlingM.J. (2010). Number-processing skills in adults with dyslexia. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 1361–1373.
18.
McCannR.S.BesnerD. (1987). Reading pseudohomophones: Implications for models of pronunciation assembly and the locus of word-frequency effects in naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 14–24.
19.
McCloskeyM.MacarusoP.WhetstoneT. (1992). The functional architecture of numerical processing mechanisms: Defending the modular model. In CampbellJ.I.D. (Ed.), The nature and origins of mathematical skills (Advances in Psychology 91, pp. 493–538). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland.
20.
MorrisC.D.BransfordJ.D.FranksJ.F. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 519–533.
21.
MortonJ. (1969). Interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review, 76, 165–178.
22.
O’MalleyS.BesnerD. (2008). Reading aloud: Qualitative differences in the relation between stimulus quality and word frequency as a function of context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 1400–1411.
23.
O’MalleyS.ReynoldsM.BesnerD. (2007). Qualitative differences between the joint effects of stimulus quality and word frequency in reading aloud and lexical decision: Extensions to Yap and Balota (2007). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 451–458.
24.
PerryC.ZieglerJ.C.ZorziM. (2007). Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: The CDP+ model of reading aloud. Psychological Review, 114, 273–315.
25.
RoedigerH.L.IIIGalloD.A.GeraciL. (2002). Processing approaches to cognition: The impetus from the levels-of-processing framework. Memory, 10, 319–332.
26.
RumelhartD.E.McClellandJ.L. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375–407.
27.
ScarboroughD.L.CorteseC.ScarboroughH.S. (1977). Frequency and repetition effects in lexical memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 1–17.
SeymourP.H.K. (1986). Cognitive analysis of dyslexia. New York, NY: Routledge.
30.
TreismanA.M. (1964). Effect of irrelevant material on the efficiency of selective listening. The American Journal of Psychology, 77, 533–546.
31.
TulvingE. (1993). What is episodic memory?Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2, 67–70.
32.
VenablesW.N.SmithD.M. & the R Development Core Team. (2004). An introduction to R, notes on R: A programming environment for data analysis and graphics. Retrieved June 2009from http://www.r-project.org/
33.
VisserT.A.W.BesnerD. (2001). On the dominance of whole-word knowledge in reading aloud. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 560–567.
