Influential models of visual working memory treat each item to be stored as an independent unit and assume that there are no interactions between items. However, real-world displays have structure that provides higher-order constraints on the items to be remembered. Even in the case of a display of simple colored circles, observers can compute statistics, such as mean circle size, to obtain an overall summary of the display. We examined the influence of such an ensemble statistic on visual working memory. We report evidence that the remembered size of each individual item in a display is biased toward the mean size of the set of items in the same color and the mean size of all items in the display. This suggests that visual working memory is constructive, encoding displays at multiple levels of abstraction and integrating across these levels, rather than maintaining a veridical representation of each item independently.
AlvarezG.A.CavanaghP. (2004). The capacity of visual short-term memory is set both by visual information load and by number of objects. Psychological Science, 15, 106–111.
2.
AlvarezG.A.OlivaA. (2008). The representation of simple ensemble visual features outside the focus of attention. Psychological Science, 19, 392–398.
3.
AlvarezG.A.OlivaA. (2009). Spatial ensemble statistics: Efficient codes that can be represented with reduced attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 106, 7345–7350.
BartlettF. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. New York, NY: Macmillan.
6.
BaysP.M.CatalaoR.F.G.HusainM. (2009). The precision of visual working memory is set by allocation of a shared resource. Journal of Vision, 9(10), Article 7. Retrieved from http://journalofvision.org/9/10/7/
7.
BaysP.M.HusainM. (2008). Dynamic shifts of limited working memory resources in human vision. Science, 321, 851.
8.
BradyT.F.KonkleT.AlvarezG.A. (2009). Compression in visual short-term memory: Using statistical regularities to form more efficient memory representations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 487–502.
9.
BradyT.F.TenenbaumJ.B. (2010). Encoding higher-order structure in visual working memory: A probabilistic model. In OhlssonS.CatramboneR. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 411–416). Portland, OR: Cognitive Science Society.
10.
ChongS.C.TreismanA. (2003). Representation of statistical properties. Vision Research, 43, 393–404.
11.
ChongS.C.TreismanA. (2005a). Attentional spread in the statistical processing of visual displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 1–13.
12.
ChongS.C.TreismanA. (2005b). Statistical processing: Computing the average size in perceptual groups. Vision Research, 45, 891–900.
13.
de FockertJ.WolfensteinC. (2009). Rapid extraction of mean identity from sets of faces. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1716–1722.
14.
FeigensonL. (2008). Parallel non-verbal enumeration is constrained by a set-based limit. Cognition, 107, 1–18.
15.
HabermanJ.WhitneyD. (2007). Rapid extraction of mean emotion and gender from sets of faces. Current Biology, 17, R751–R753.
16.
HabermanJ.WhitneyD. (2009). The visual system ignores outliers when extracting a summary representation [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 9(8), Article 804. Retrieved from http://www.journalofvision.org/content/9/8/804
17.
HalberdaJ.SiresS.F.FeigensonL. (2006). Multiple spatially overlapping sets can be enumerated in parallel. Psychological Science, 17, 572–576.
18.
HemmerP.SteyversM. (2009). Integrating episodic memories and prior knowledge at multiple levels of abstraction. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 80–87.
19.
HollingworthA. (2008). Visual memory for natural scenes. In LuckS.J.HollingworthA. (Eds.), Visual memory (pp. 123–162). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
20.
HuangJ.SekulerR. (2010). Distortions in recall from visual memory: Two classes of attractors at work. Journal of Vision, 10(2), Article 24. Retrieved from http://www.journalofvision.org/content/10/2/24.full
21.
HuangL.TreismanA.PashlerH. (2007). Characterizing the limits of human visual awareness. Science, 317, 823–825.
22.
HuttenlocherJ.HedgesL.V.VeveaJ.L. (2000). Why do categories affect stimulus judgment?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 220–241.
23.
JiangY.OlsonI.R.ChunM.M. (2000). Organization of visual short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 683–702.
24.
JohnsonJ.S.SpencerJ.LuckS.SchönerG. (2009). A dynamic neural field model of visual working memory and change detection. Psychological Science, 20, 568–577.
25.
KonkleT.OlivaA. (2007). Normative representation of objects: Evidence for an ecological bias in object perception and memory. In McNamaraD.S.TraftonJ.G. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 407–413). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
26.
LampinenJ.M.CopelandS.NeuschatzJ.S. (2001). Recollections of things schematic: Room schemas revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1211–1222.
27.
LinP.-H.LuckS.J. (2008). The influence of similarity on visual working memory representations. Visual Cognition, 17, 356–372.
28.
LuckS.J.VogelE.K. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature, 390, 279–281.
29.
OlivaA. (2005). Gist of the scene. In IttiL.ReesG.TsotsosJ.K. (Eds.), The encyclopedia of neurobiology of attention (pp. 251–256). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
30.
ParkesL.LundJ.AngelucciA.SolomonJ.A.MorganM. (2001). Compulsory averaging of crowded orientation signals in human vision. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 739–744.
31.
RosenholtzR.AlvarezG.A. (2007) How and why we perceive sets: What does modeling tell us? [Abstract]. Perception, 36(ECVP Abstract Supplement), 8. Retrieved from http://www.perceptionweb.com/ecvp/ecvp07.pdf
32.
RouderJ.N.MoreyR.D.CowanN.ZwillingC.E.MoreyC.C.PratteM.S. (2008). An assessment of fixed-capacity models of visual working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 105, 5975–5979.
33.
SanockiT.SellersE.MittelstadtJ.SulmanN. (2010). How high is visual short term memory capacity for object layout?Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 1097–1109.
34.
Turk-BrowneN.B.JungéJ.A.SchollB.J. (2005). The automaticity of visual statistical learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 552–564.
35.
VictorJ.D.ConteM.M. (2004). Visual working memory for image statistics. Vision Research, 44, 541–556.
36.
VidalJ.R.GauchouH.L.Tallon-BaudryC.O’ReganJ.K. (2005). Relational information in visual short-term memory: The structural gist. Journal of Vision, 5(3), Article 8. Retrieved from http://journalofvision.org/5/3/8/
ZhangW.LuckS.J. (2008). Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory. Nature, 452, 233–235.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
