BhallaM.ProffittD.R. (1999). Visual-motor recalibration in geographical slant perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1076–1096.
2.
Creem-RegehrS.H.GoochA.A.SahmC.S.ThompsonW.B. (2004). Perceiving virtual geographical slant: Action influences perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 811–821.
3.
DurginF.H.BairdJ.A.GreenburgM.RussellR.ShaughnessyK.WaymouthS. (2009). Who is being deceived? The experimental demands of wearing a backpack. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 964–969.
4.
DurginF.H.HajnalA.LiZ.TongeN.StiglianiA. (2010). Palm boards are not action measures: An alternative to the two-systems theory of geographical slant perception. Acta Psychologica, 134, 182–197.
5.
GallistelC.R. (2009). The importance of proving the null. Psychological Review, 116, 439–453.
6.
LiZ.DurginF.H. (2009). Downhill slopes look shallower from the edge. Journal of Vision, 9(11), Article 6. Retrieved November 16, 2010, from http://journalofvision.org/9/11/6.full
7.
NormanJ.F.CrabtreeC.E.BartholomewA.N.FerrellE.L. (2009). Aging and the perception of slant from optical texture, motion parallax, and binocular disparity. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71, 116–130.
RossH.E. (2006). Judgements of frontal slope in nearby outdoor scenes. In KornbrotD.E.MsetfiR.M.MacRaeA.W. (Eds.), Fechner day 2006 (pp. 257–262). St. Albans, England: International Society for Psychophysics.
10.
StefanucciJ.K.ProffittD.R.CloreG.L.ParekhN. (2008). Skating down a steeper slope: Fear influences the perception of geographical slant. Perception, 37, 321–323.