AkramiN.EkehammarB.ArayaT. (2000). Classical and modern racial prejudice: A study of attitudes toward immigrants in Sweden. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 521–532.
2.
AkramiN.EkehammarB.BerghR.DahlstrandE.MalmstenS. (2009). Prejudice: The person in the situation. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 890–897.
3.
AkramiN.EkehammarB.ClaessonM.SonnanderK. (2006). Classical and modern prejudice: Attitudes toward people with intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 27, 605–617.
4.
AllportG.W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
5.
AltemeyerB. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada: University of Manitoba Press.
6.
BergmanH. (2003). NEO-PI-R: Manual–Svensk version [NEO-PI-R: Manual–Swedish version]. Stockholm, Sweden: Psykologiförlaget.
7.
CostaP.T.Jr.TerraccianoA.McCraeR.R. (2001). Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: Robust and surprising findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 322–331.
8.
EkehammarB.AkramiN. (2003). The relation between personality and prejudice: A variable- and a person-centred approach. European Journal of Personality, 17, 449–464.
9.
EkehammarB.AkramiN.ArayaT. (2000). Development and validation of Swedish classical and modern sexism scales. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 41, 307–314.
10.
EkehammarB.BerghR.AkramiN. (2010). Person-positivity bias in sexual prejudice: Distinguishing between attitudes to homosexuality, gays, and lesbians. Manuscript submitted for publication.
11.
GrazianoW.G.TobinR.M. (2009). Agreeableness. In LearyM.R.HoyleR.H. (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 46–61). New York, NY: Guilford.
12.
HodsonG. (2009). The puzzling person-situation schism in prejudice research. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 247–248.
13.
HuangL.L.LiuJ. (2005). Personality and social structural implications of the situational priming of social dominance orientation. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 267–276.
14.
McCraeR.R. (1996). Social consequences of experiential openness. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 323–337.
15.
McCraeR.R.CostaP.T.Jr. (2008). The five-factor theory of personality. In JohnO.P.RobinsR.W.PervinL.A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 159–180). New York, NY: Guilford.
16.
McCraeR.R.SutinA.R. (2009). Openness to experience. In LearyM.R.HoyleR.H. (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 257–273). New York, NY: Guilford.
17.
McFarlandS.G. (2010). Authoritarianism, social dominance, and other roots of generalized prejudice. Political Psychology, 31, 425–449.
18.
SibleyC.G.DuckittJ. (2008). Personality and prejudice: A meta-analysis and theoretical review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 248–279.
19.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.