BroadbentD. (1958). Perception and communication. New York, NY: Pergamon Press.
2.
ColesM.G.H. (1989). Modern mind reading: Psychophysiology, physiology, and cognition. Psychophysiology, 26, 251–269.
3.
CrumpM.J.C.LoganG.D. (2010). Hierarchical control and skilled typing: Evidence for word level control over the execution of individual keystrokes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1369–1380.
4.
EricssonK.A.KrampeR.T.Tesch-RömerC. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363–406.
5.
FlandersM.SoechtingJ.F. (1992). Kinematics of typing: Parallel control of the two hands. Journal of Neurophysiology, 67, 1264–1274.
6.
HazeltineE.RuthruffE.RemingtonR.W. (2006). The role of input and output modality pairings in dual-task performance: Evidence for content-dependent central interference. Cognitive Psychology, 52, 291–345.
7.
HazeltineE.TeagueD.IvryR.B. (2002). Simultaneous dual-task performance reveals parallel response selection after practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 527–545.
8.
JasperH.H. (1958). The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 10, 371–375.
9.
LeinM.-C.RuthruffE.HsiehS.YuT.-T. (2007). Parallel central processing between tasks: Evidence from lateralized readiness potentials. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 133–141.
10.
LoganG.D. (2003). Simon-type effects: Chronometric evidence for keypress schemata in typewriting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 741–757.
11.
LoganG.D.ZbrodoffN.J. (1998). Stroop type interference: Congruity effects in color naming with typewritten responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 978–992.
12.
McCannR.JohnstonJ.C. (1992). Locus of the single-channel bottleneck in dual-task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 471–484.
13.
OsmanA.MooreC.M. (1993). The locus of dual-task interference: Psychological refractory effects on movement-related brain potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 1292–1312.
14.
PashlerH. (1994). Dual task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 220–244.
15.
PashlerH.JohnstonJ.C. (1989). Chronometric evidence for postponement in temporally overlapping tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 41, 19–45.
16.
SalthouseT.A. (1986). Perceptual, cognitive, and motoric aspects of transcription typing. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 303–319.
17.
SommerW.LeutholdH.SchubertT. (2001). Multiple bottlenecks in information processing? An electrophysiological examination. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 81–88.
18.
TombuM.JolicoeurP. (2004). Virtually no evidence for virtually perfect time-sharing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 795–810.
19.
WelfordA.T. (1952). The “psychological refractory period” and the timing of high-speed performance. British Journal of Psychology, 43, 2–19.