Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Visual objects are high-level primitives that are fundamental to numerous perceptual functions, such as guidance of attention. We report that objects warp visual perception of space in such a way that spatial distances within objects appear to be larger than spatial distances in ground regions. When two dots were placed inside a rectangular object, they appeared farther apart from one another than two dots with identical spacing outside of the object. To investigate whether this effect was object based, we measured the distortion while manipulating the structure surrounding the dots. Object displays were constructed with a single object, multiple objects, a partially occluded object, and an illusory object. Nonobject displays were constructed to be comparable to object displays in low-level visual attributes. In all cases, the object displays resulted in a more powerful distortion of spatial perception than comparable non-object-based displays. These results suggest that perception of space within objects is warped.

Keywords

object perception spatial perception perceptual organization figure-ground grouping

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anton-Erxleben

Henrich

Treue

(2007). Attention changes perceived size of moving visual patterns. Journal of Vision, 7(11), Article 5. Retrieved January 1, 2010, from http://www.journalofvision.org/content/7/11/5.full

Carrasco

Ling

Read

(2004). Attention alters appearance. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 308–313.

Coren

Girgus

J.S.

(1980). Principles of perceptual organization and spatial distortion: The Gestalt illusions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6, 404–412.

Duncan

(1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 501–517.

Egly

Driver

Rafal

R.D.

(1994). Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: Evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 161–177.

Fellows

B.J.

(1967). Reversal of the Müller-Lyer illusion with changes in the length of the inter-fins line. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 19, 208–214.

Gobell

Carrasco

(2005). Attention alters the appearance of spatial frequency and gap size. Psychological Science, 16, 644–651.

Kimchi

Yeshurun

Cohen-Savransky

(2007). Automatic, stimulus-driven attentional capture by objecthood. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 166–172.

Kovacs

Julesz

(1994). Perceptual sensitivity maps within globally defined visual shapes. Nature, 370, 644–646.

10.

Marcus

D.S.

Van Essen

D.C.

(2002). Scene segmentation and attention in primate cortical areas V1 and V2. Journal of Neurophysiology, 88, 2648–2658.

11.

Palmer

Schloss

(2009). A configural shape illusion [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 9(8), Article 917. Retrieved May 18, 2010, from http://www.journalofvision.org/content/9/8/917.abstract

12.

Palmer

S.E.

(1992). Common region: A new principle of perceptual grouping. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 436–447.

13.

Scholl

B.J.

(2001). Objects and attention: The state of the art. Cognition, 80, 9–17.

14.

Vickery

T.J.

Jiang

Y.V.

(2009). Associative grouping: Perceptual grouping of shapes by association. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71, 896–909.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.01 MB