ColtheartM.RastleK.PerryC.LangdonR.ZieglerJ. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204–256.
2.
PelliD.G.FarellB.MooreD.C. (2003). The remarkable inefficiency of word recognition. Nature, 423, 752–756.
3.
PeressottiF.GraingerJ. (1995). Letter-position coding in random consonant arrays. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 875–890.
4.
RumelhartD.E.McClellandJ.L. (1982). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. Psychological Review, 89, 60–94.
5.
SchoonbaertS.GraingerJ. (2004). Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 333–367.
6.
SeidenbergM.S.PlautD.C. (1998). Evaluating word-reading models at the item level: Matching the grain of theory and data. Psychological Science, 9, 234–237.
7.
StevensM.GraingerJ. (2003). Letter visibility and the viewing position effect in visual word recognition. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 133–151.
8.
TydgatI.GraingerJ. (2009). Serial position effects in the identification of letters, digits, and symbols. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 480–498.
9.
WhitneyC. (2001). How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 221–243.
10.
WhitneyC.CornelissenP. (2007). SERIOL reading. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 143–164.