BeilockS.L.CarrT.H. (2005). When high-powered people fail: Working memory and “choking under pressure” in math. Psychological Science, 16, 101–105.
2.
BeilockS.L.DeCaroM.S. (2007). From poor performance to success under stress: Working memory, strategy selection, and mathematical problem solving under pressure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 983–998.
3.
BeilockS.L.RydellR.J.McConnellA.R. (2007). Stereotype threat and working memory: Mechanisms, alleviation, and spillover. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 256–276.
4.
ConwayA.R.A.KaneM.J.EngleR.W. (2003). Working memory capacity and its relation to general intelligence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 547–552.
5.
DaviesP.G.SpencerS.J.QuinnD.M.GerhardsteinR. (2002). Consuming images: How television commercials that elicit stereotype threat can restrain women academically and professionally. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1615–1628.
6.
DesmetteD.HupetM.SchelstraeteM.-A.van der LindenM. (1995). Adaptation en langue française du ‘Reading Span Test’ de Daneman et Carpenter (1980) [A French version of Daneman and Carpenter’s (1980) Reading Span Test (RST)]. L’Année psychologique, 95, 459–482.
7.
GimmigD.HuguetP.CaverniJ.-P.CuryF. (2006). Choking under pressure and working-memory capacity: When performance pressure reduces fluid intelligence. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 1005–1010.
8.
HuguetP.RégnerI. (2007). Stereotype threat among schoolgirls in quasi-ordinary classroom circumstances. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 545–560.
9.
HuguetP.RégnerI. (2009). Counter-stereotypic beliefs in math do not protect school girls from stereotype threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1024–1027.
10.
InzlichtM.Ben-ZeevT. (2000). A threatening intellectual environment: Why females are susceptible to experiencing problem-solving deficits in the presence of males. Psychological Science, 11, 365–371.
11.
KaneM.J.ConwayA.R.A.HambrickD.Z.EngleR.W. (2007). Variation in working memory capacity as variation in executive attention and control. In MiyakeA.ConwayA.R.A.JarroldC.KaneM.J.TowseJ.N. (Eds.), Variation in working memory (pp. 21–46). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
12.
PreacherK.J.CurranP.J.BauerD.J. (2006). Computational tools for probing interaction effects in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31, 437–448.
13.
RavenJ.RavenJ.C.CourtJ.H. (1998). Manual for Raven’s Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Scales: Section 4. The Advanced Progressive Matrices. Oxford, England: Oxford Psychologists Press.
14.
RydellR.J.McConnellA.R.BeilockS.L. (2009). Multiple social identities and stereotype threat: Imbalance, accessibility, and working memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 949–966.
15.
SchmaderT.JohnsM. (2003). Converging evidence that stereotype threat reduces working memory capacity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 440–452.
16.
SchmaderT.JohnsM.ForbesC. (2008). An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance. Psychological Review, 115, 336–356.
17.
SteeleC.M. (1997). A threat in the air. American Psychologist, 52, 613–629.
18.
SteeleC.M.AronsonJ. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797–811.
19.
SteeleC.M.SpencerS.J.AronsonJ. (2002). Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat. In ZannaM.P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 379–440). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
20.
UnsworthN.BrewerG.A.SpillersG.J. (2009). There’s more to the working memory capacity—fluid intelligence relationship than just secondary memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 931–937.
21.
WaltonG.M.CohenG.L. (2003). Stereotype lift. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 456–467.