In this study, we separated for the first time the learned liking for a particular level of sweetness in a familiar drink from the infantile delight in sweetness as such (“the sweeter, the better”). It is widely assumed that sensing a liked food or drink evokes a pleasurable experience, but the only psychological evidence for this assumption has been tongue movements that are elicited specifically by sweet taste in animals and human neonates. We found that adults felt such movements in response to drinking juice at both their personally preferred level of sweetness and levels they deemed so sweet as to be undrinkable. Yet only the intolerably strong level of sweetness elicited enjoyment of the experienced movements, elevation of mood, and a sense of smiling. Hence, the pleasure that adults experience during ingestion could be exclusively linked with the congenital sweetness reflex that sends mother’s milk down an infant’s throat.
AddessiE.GallowayA.T.VisalberghiE.BirchL.L. (2005). Specific social influences on the acceptance of novel foods in 2–5-year-old children. Appetite, 45, 264–271.
2.
BerridgeK.C. (1996). Food reward: Brain substrates of wanting and liking. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 20, 1–25.
3.
BerridgeK.C.GrillH.J. (1983). Alternating ingestive and aversive consummatory responses suggest a two-dimensional analysis of palatability in rats. Behavioral Neuroscience, 97, 563–573.
4.
BerridgeK.C.RobinsonT.E. (2003). Parsing reward. Trends in Neurosciences, 26, 507–513.
5.
BerridgeK.C.VenierI.L.RobinsonT.E. (1989). Taste reactivity analysis of 6-hydroxydopamine-induced aphagia: Implications for arousal and anhedonia hypotheses of dopamine function. Behavioral Neuroscience, 103, 36–45.
6.
BoothD.A. (1981). The physiology of appetite. British Medical Bulletin, 37, 135–140.
7.
BoothD.A. (1985). Food-conditioned eating preferences and aversions with interoceptive elements: Conditioned appetites and satieties. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 443, 22–37.
8.
BoothD.A. (1991). Learned ingestive motivation and the pleasures of the palate. In BollesR.C. (Ed.), The hedonics of taste (pp. 29–58). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9.
BoothD.A. (1994). Psychology of nutrition. Hove, England: Psychology Press.
BoothD.A.LovettD.McSherryG.M. (1972). Postingestive modulation of the sweetness preference gradient in the rat. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 78, 485–512.
12.
BoothD.A.ShepherdR. (1988). Sensory influences on food acceptance—the neglected approach to nutrition promotion. BNF Nutrition Bulletin, 13, 39–54.
13.
BowmanS.J.BoothD.A.PlattsR.G., & UK Sjögren’s Interest Group. (2004). Measurement of fatigue and discomfort in primary Sjogren’s syndrome using a new questionnaire tool. Rheumatology, 43, 758–764.
14.
CabanacM. (1971). Physiological role of pleasure. Science, 173, 1103–1106.
15.
ConnerM.T.HaddonA.V.BoothD.A. (1986). Very rapid, precise measurement of effects of constituent variation on product acceptability: Consumer sweetness preferences in a lime drink. LWT – Food Science and Technology, 19, 486–490.
16.
ConnerM.T.HaddonA.V.PickeringE.S.BoothD.A. (1988). Sweet tooth demonstrated: Individual differences in preference for both sweet foods and foods highly sweetened. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 275–280.
17.
CraigW. (1996). Appetites and aversions as constituents of instincts. In HouckL.D.DrickamerL.C. (Eds.), Foundations of animal behavior (pp. 276–292). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1918)
18.
CristE. (1999). Images of animals: Anthropomorphism and animal mind. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
19.
FinlaysonG.KingN.BlundellJ.E. (2007). Is it possible to dissociate ‘liking’ and ‘wanting’ for foods in humans? A novel experimental procedure. Physiology & Behavior, 90, 36–42.
20.
KnibbR.C.SmithD.M.BoothD.A.ArmstrongA.M.PlattsR.G.MacdonaldA.BoothI.W. (2001). No unique role of nausea attributed to eating a food in the recalled acquisition of sensory aversion for that food. Appetite, 36, 225–234.
21.
LaengB.BerridgeK.C.ButterC.M. (1994). Pleasantness of a sweet taste during hunger and satiety: Effects of gender and sweet tooth. Appetite, 21, 247–254.
22.
PecinaS.BerridgeK.C. (2005). Hedonic hot spot in nucleus accumbens shell: Where do mu-opioids cause increased hedonic impact of sweetness?Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 11777–11786.
PoultonE.C. (1988). Bias in quantifying judgments. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
25.
RosensteinD.OsterD. (1988). Differential facial responses to four basic tastes in newborns. Child Development, 59, 1555–1568.
26.
RoussetS.SchlichP.ChatonnierA.BarthomeufL.Droit-VoletS. (2008). Is the desire to eat familiar and unfamiliar meats influenced by emotions expressed on eaters’ faces?Appetite, 50, 110–119.
27.
SauterD. (2010). More than happy: The need for disentangling positive emotions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 36–40.
28.
ShepardR.N. (1957). Stimulus and response generalisation: A stochastic model relating generalization to distance in psychological space. Psychometrika, 22, 325–345.
29.
SteinerJ. (1977). Facial expressions of the neonate infant indicating the hedonics of food-related chemical stimuli. In WeiffenbachJ.M. (Ed.), Taste and development: The genesis of sweet preference (pp. 173–189). Bethesda, MD: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
30.
SteinerJ.E.GlaserD.HawiloM.E.BerridgeK.C. (2001). Comparative expression of hedonic impact: Affective reactions to taste by human infants and other primates. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 25, 53–74.
31.
ZeinstraG.G.KoelenM.A.ColindresD.KokF.J.de GraafC. (2009). Facial expressions in school-aged children are a good indicator of ‘dislikes’, but not of ‘likes.’Food Quality and Preference, 20, 620–624.
