Cosmetic Use of Botulinum Toxin-A Affects Processing of Emotional Language

Abstract

How does language reliably evoke emotion, as it does when people read a favorite novel or listen to a skilled orator? Recent evidence suggests that comprehension involves a mental simulation of sentence content that calls on the same neural systems used in literal action, perception, and emotion. In this study, we demonstrated that involuntary facial expression plays a causal role in the processing of emotional language. Subcutaneous injections of botulinum toxin-A (BTX) were used to temporarily paralyze the facial muscle used in frowning. We found that BTX selectively slowed the reading of sentences that described situations that normally require the paralyzed muscle for expressing the emotions evoked by the sentences. This finding demonstrates that peripheral feedback plays a role in language processing, supports facial-feedback theories of emotional cognition, and raises questions about the effects of BTX on cognition and emotional reactivity. We account for the role of facial feedback in language processing by considering neurophysiological mechanisms and reinforcement-learning theory.

Keywords

language comprehension emotion facial expressions facial feedback botulinum toxin denervation embodied cognition emotion simulation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abbruzzese

Berardelli

(2006). Neurophysiological effects of botulinum toxin type A. Neurotoxicity Research, 9, 109–114.

Adelman

P.K.

Zajonc

R.B.

(1989). Facial efference and the experience of emotion. Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 249–280.

Antonucci

Rossi

Gianfranceschi

Rossetto

Caleo

(2008). Long-distance retrograde effects of botulinum neurotoxin A. Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 3689–3696.

Barsalou

(1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 22, 577–660.

Chomsky

(1959). A review of B.F. Skinner’s verbal behavior. Language, 35, 26–58.

Darwin

C.R.

(1998). The expression of emotions in man and animals. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1872)

Doya

(2007). Reinforcement learning: Computational theory and biological mechanisms. HFSP Journal, 1, 30.

Doya

(2008). Modulators of decision making. Nature Neuroscience, 11, 410–416.

Gallese

(2003). The manifold nature of interpersonal relations: The quest for a common mechanism. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 358, 517–528.

10.

Gallese

(2008). Mirror neurons and the social nature of language: The neural exploitation hypothesis. Social Neuroscience, 3, 317–333.

11.

Gandevia

S.C.

(2001). Spinal and supraspinal factors in human muscle fatigue. Physiological Review, 81, 1725–1789.

12.

Ghez

Gordon

Gilardi

M.F.

Christakos

C.N.

Cooper

S.E.

(1995). Impairments of reaching movements in patients without proprioception: II. Effects of visual information on accuracy. Journal of Neurophysiology, 73, 361–372.

13.

Glenberg

A.M.

Kaschak

M.P.

(2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 558–565.

14.

Glenberg

A.M.

Webster

B.J.

Mouilso

Havas

Lindeman

L.M.

(2009). Gender, emotion, and the embodiment of language comprehension. Emotion Review, 1, 151–161.

15.

Hamjian

J.A.

Walker

F.O.

(1994). Serial neurophysiological studies of intramuscular botulinum-A toxin in humans. Muscle & Nerve, 17, 1385–1392.

16.

Havas

D.A.

Glenberg

A.M.

Rinck

(2007). Emotion simulation during language comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 436–441.

17.

Hennenlotter

Dresel

Castrop

Ceballos Baumann

A.L.

Wohlschläger

A.M.

Haslinger

(2009). The link between facial feedback and neural activity within central circuitries of emotion—new insights from botulinum toxin-induced denervation of frown muscles. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 537–542.

18.

Niedenthal

P.M.

(2007). Embodying emotion. Science, 316, 1002–1005.

19.

Niedenthal

P.M.

Winkielman

Mondillon

Vermeulen

(2009). Embodiment of emotion concepts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1120–1136.

20.

Oberman

L.M.

Winkielman

Ramachandran

V.S.

(2007). Face to face: Blocking facial mimicry can selectively impair recognition of emotional expressions. Social Neuroscience, 2, 167–178.

21.

Pestronk

Drachman

D.B.

Griffin

J.W.

(1976). Effect of botulinum toxin on trophic regulation of acetycholine receptors. Nature, 264, 787–789.

22.

Pulvermüller

(2005). Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 576–582.

23.

Rosales

R.L.

Arimura

Takenaga

Osame

(1996). Extrafusal and intrafusal muscle effects in experimental botulinum toxin-A injection. Muscle & Nerve, 19, 488–496.

24.

Simpson

L.L.

(1981). The origin, structure, and pharmacological activity of botulinum toxin. Pharmacological Review, 33, 155–188.

25.

Soussignan

(2002). Duchenne smile, emotional experience, and autonomic reactivity: A test of the facial feedback hypothesis. Emotion, 2, 52–74.

26.

Strack

Martin

L.L.

Stepper

(1988). Inhibiting and facilitating conditions of the human smile: A nonobtrusive test of the facial feedback hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 768–777.

27.

Watson

Clark

L.A.

(1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.08 MB