Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

To contribute to researchers’ understanding of how humans choose mates, we examined how the number of mate options influenced the dating decisions made by 1,868 women and 1,870 men across 84 speed-dating events. Multilevel modeling of these decisions revealed that when faced with abundant choice, choosers paid less attention to characteristics requiring more time to elicit and evaluate (e.g., occupational status and educational attainment) and more attention to characteristics that are quickly and easily assessed (e.g., height and weight). Human mate choice sits squarely within the domain of general cognition, as this study shows it to be constrained by bounds on cognitive resources.

Keywords

choice overload cognition decision making evolutionary psychology mate choice speed dating

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baumeister

R.F.

Catanese

K.R.

Vohs

K.D.

(2001). Is there a gender difference in strength of sex drive? Theoretical views, conceptual distinctions, and a review of relevant evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 242–273.

Chernev

(2003). When more is less and less is more: The role of ideal point availability and assortment in consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 170–183.

Dunbar

R.I.M.

(1998). The social brain hypothesis. Evolutionary Anthropology, 6, 178–190.

Fasolo

Carmeci

F.A.

Misuraca

(2009). The effect of choice complexity on perception of time spent choosing: When choice takes longer but feels shorter. Psychology & Marketing, 26, 213–228.

Feingold

(1990). Gender differences in effects of physical attractiveness on romantic attraction: A comparison across five research paradigms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 981–993.

Finkel

E.J.

Eastwick

P.W.

(2008). Speed-dating. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 193–197.

Fiske

(1998). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. In Gilbert

D.T.

Fiske

S.T.

Lindzey

(Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 357–411). Boston: McGraw-Hill.

Gigerenzer

Selten

(Eds.). (2001). Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Haselton

M.G.

Buss

D.M.

(2000). Error management theory: A new perspective on biases in cross-sex mind reading. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 81–91.

10.

Huberman

Jiang

(2006). Offering versus choice in 401(k) plans: Equity exposure and number of funds. Journal of Finance, 61, 763–801.

11.

Hutchinson

J.M.C.

(2005). Is more choice always desirable? Evidence and arguments from leks, food selection, and environmental enrichment. Biological Review, 80, 73–92.

12.

Iyengar

S.S.

Lepper

M.R.

(2000). When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 995–1006.

13.

Kurzban

Weeden

(2005). HurryDate: Mate preferences in action. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 227–244.

14.

Lenton

A.P.

Bryan

Hastie

Fischer

(2007). We want the same thing: Projection in judgments of sexual intent. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 975–988.

15.

Lenton

A.P.

Fasolo

Todd

P.M.

(2008). “Shopping” for a mate: Expected vs. experienced preferences in online mate choice. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 51, 169–182.

16.

Lenton

A.P.

Fasolo

Todd

P.M.

(2009). The relationship between number of potential mates and mating skew in humans. Animal Behaviour, 77, 55–60.

17.

Lenton

A.P.

Stewart

(2008). Changing her ways: Number of options and mate standard strength impact mate choice strategy and satisfaction. Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 501–511.

18.

Malhotra

N.K.

(1982). Information load and consumer decision making. Journal of Consumer Research, 8, 419–430.

19.

Miller

G.F.

(1997). Mate choice: From sexual cues to cognitive adaptations. In Cardew

(Ed.), Characterizing human psychological adaptations (Ciba Foundation Symposium No. 208, pp. 71–87). Malden, MA: Wiley.

20.

Miller

G.F.

Todd

P.M.

(1998). Mate choice turns cognitive. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 190–198.

21.

Payne

J.W.

Bettman

J.R.

Johnson

E.J.

(1993). The adaptive decision maker. New York: Cambridge University Press.

22.

Rabe-Hesketh

Skrondal

Pickles

(2005). Maximum likelihood estimation of limited and discrete dependent variable models with nested random effects. Journal of Econometrics, 128, 301–323.

23.

Reutskaja

Hogarth

R.M.

(2009). Satisfaction in choice as a function of the number of alternatives: When “goods satiate.” Psychology & Marketing, 26, 197–203.

24.

Saad

Eba

Sejean

(2009). Sex differences when searching for a mate: A process-tracing approach. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 22, 171–190.

25.

Scheibehenne

Greifeneder

Todd

P.M.

(in press). Can there ever be too many options? A meta-analytic review of choice overload. Journal of Consumer Research.

26.

Schwartz

(2004). The tyranny of choice. Scientific American, 290, 70–75.

27.

Simon

H.A.

(1990). Invariants of human behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 1–19.

28.

Simpson

J.A.

Gangestad

S.W.

(1992). Sociosexuality and romantic partner choice. Journal of Personality, 60, 31–51.

29.

Sullivan

M.S.

(1994). Mate choice as information gathering process under time constraint: Implication for behaviour and signal design. Animal Behaviour, 47, 141–151.

30.

Todd

P.M.

Penke

Fasolo

Lenton

A.P.

(2007). Different cognitive processes underlie human mate choices and mate preferences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 104, 15011–15016.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.03 MB

0.01 MB

How Humans Cognitively Manage an Abundance of Mate Options

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material