Alphabetic orthographies differ in the transparency of their letter-sound mappings, with English orthography being less transparent than other alphabetic scripts. The outlier status of English has led scientists to question the generality of findings based on English-language studies. We investigated the role of phonological awareness, memory, vocabulary, rapid naming, and nonverbal intelligence in reading performance across five languages lying at differing positions along a transparency continuum (Finnish, Hungarian, Dutch, Portuguese, and French). Results from a sample of 1,265 children in Grade 2 showed that phonological awareness was the main factor associated with reading performance in each language. However, its impact was modulated by the transparency of the orthography, being stronger in less transparent orthographies. The influence of rapid naming was rather weak and limited to reading and decoding speed. Most predictors of reading performance were relatively universal across these alphabetic languages, although their precise weight varied systematically as a function of script transparency.
BorgwaldtS.R.HellwigF.M.De GrootA.M.B. (2005). Onset entropy matters—letter-to-phoneme mappings in seven languages. Reading and Writing, 18, 211–229.
2.
BradleyL.BryantP.E. (1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read: A causal connection. Nature, 301, 419–421.
3.
BruckM.GeneseeF.CaravolasM. (1997). A cross-linguistic study of early literacy acquisition. In BlachmanB.A. (Ed.), Foundations of reading acquisition and dyslexia: Implications for early intervention (pp. 145–162). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
4.
CaravolasM.VolinJ.HulmeC. (2005). Phoneme awareness is a key component of alphabetic literacy skills in consistent and inconsistent orthographies: Evidence from Czech and English children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 92, 107–139.
5.
CastlesA.ColtheartM. (2004). Is there a causal link from phonological awareness to success in learning to read?Cognition, 91, 77–111.
6.
ChiappeP.StringerR.SiegelL.S.StanovichK.E. (2002). Why the timing deficit hypothesis does not explain reading disability in adults. Reading and Writing, 15, 73–107.
7.
de JongP.F.van der LeijA. (1999). Specific contributions of phonological abilities to early reading acquisition: Results from a Dutch latent variable longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 450–476.
8.
de JongP.F.van der LeijA. (2003). Developmental changes in the manifestation of a phonological deficit in dyslexic children learning to read a regular orthography. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 22–40.
9.
DencklaM.B.RudelR. (1974). Rapid “automatized” naming of pictured objects, colors, letters and numbers by normal children. Cortex, 10, 186–202.
10.
EhriL.C.NunesS.R.WillowsD.M.SchusterB.V.Yaghoub-ZadehZ.ShanahanT. (2001). Phonemic awareness instruction helps children learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel’s meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 250–287.
11.
FrithU.WimmerH.LanderlK. (1998). Differences in phonological recoding in German- and English-speaking children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2, 31–54.
12.
FrostR.KatzL.BentinS. (1987). Strategies for visual word recognition and orthographical depth: A multilingual comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 104–115.
13.
GeorgiouG.K.ParrilaR.PapadopoulosT.C. (2008). Predictors of word decoding and reading fluency across languages varying in orthographic consistency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 566–580.
14.
GoswamiU.GombertJ.E.de BarreraL.F. (1998). Children’s orthographic representations and linguistic transparency: Nonsense word reading in English, French, and Spanish. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19, 19–52.
15.
GoswamiU.ZieglerJ.C.DaltonL.SchneiderW. (2001). Pseudohomophone effects and phonological recoding procedures in reading development in English and German. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 648–664.
16.
GoswamiU.ZieglerJ.C.RichardsonU. (2005). The effects of spelling consistency on phonological awareness: A comparison of English and German. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 92, 345–365.
17.
HarrisM.GiannouliV. (1999). Learning to read and spell in Greek: The importance of letter knowledge and morphological awareness. In HarrisM.HatanoG. (Eds.), Learning to read and write: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 51–70). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
18.
HolopainenL.AhonenT.LyytinenH. (2001). Predicting delay in reading achievement in a highly transparent language. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 401–413.
19.
LanderlK.WimmerH. (2000). Deficits in phoneme segmentation are not the core problem of dyslexia: Evidence from German and English children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21, 243–262.
20.
LanderlK.WimmerH. (2008). Development of word reading fluency and spelling in a consistent orthography: An 8-year follow-up. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 150–161.
21.
LeppanenU.NiemiP.AunolaK.NurmiJ.E. (2006). Development of reading and spelling Finnish from preschool to Grade 1 and Grade 2. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10, 3–30.
22.
MannV.WimmerH. (2002). Phoneme awareness and pathways into literacy: A comparison of German and American children. Reading and Writing, 15, 653–682.
23.
McBride-ChangC.KailR.V. (2002). Cross-cultural similarities in the predictors of reading acquisition. Child Development, 73, 1392–1407.
24.
McBride-ChangC.ShuH.ZhouA.B.WatC.P.WagnerR.K. (2003). Morphological awareness uniquely predicts young children’s Chinese character recognition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 743–751.
25.
PatelT.K.SnowlingM.J.de JongP.F. (2004). A cross-linguistic comparison of children learning to read in English and Dutch. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 785–797.
26.
PerfettiC.A.BeckI.BellL.C.HughesC. (1987). Phonemic knowledge and learning to read are reciprocal: A longitudinal-study of 1st-grade children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly: Journal of Developmental Psychology, 33, 283–319.
27.
PerryC.ZieglerJ.C. (2002). Cross-language computational investigation of the length effect in reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 990–1001.
28.
PuolakanahoA.AhonenT.AroM.EklundK.LeppanenP.H.PoikkeusA.M.. (2007). Very early phonological and language skills: Estimating individual risk of reading disability. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48, 923–931.
29.
RavenJ.C. (1976). Standard progressive matrices: Sets A, B, C, D & E. Oxford, England: Psychologists Press.
30.
SchatschneiderC.FletcherJ.M.FrancisD.J.CarlsonC.D.FoormanB.R. (2004). Kindergarten prediction of reading skills: A longitudinal comparative analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 265–282.
31.
SeymourP.H.K.AroM.ErskineJ.M. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 143–174.
32.
ShareD.L. (2008). On the anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 584–615.
33.
ShareD.L.JormA.F.MacleanR.MatthewsR. (1984). Sources of individual-differences in reading acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1309–1324.
34.
SwansonH.L.TraininG.NecoecheaD.M.HammillD.D. (2003). Rapid naming, phonological awareness, and reading: A meta-analysis of the correlation evidence. Review of Educational Research, 73, 407–440.
35.
TanL.H.SpinksJ.A.EdenG.F.PerfettiC.A.SiokW.T. (2005). Reading depends on writing, in Chinese. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 102, 8781–8785.
36.
VaessenA.GerretsenP.BlomertL. (2009). Naming problems do not reflect a second independent core deficit in dyslexia: Double deficits explored. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103, 202–221.
37.
WechslerD. (2003). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children—Fourth Edition. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
38.
WimmerH.MayringerH.LanderlK. (2000). The double-deficit hypothesis and difficulties in learning to read a regular orthography. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 668–680.
39.
ZieglerJ.C.GoswamiU. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 3–29.
40.
ZieglerJ.C.PerryC.JacobsA.M.BraunM. (2001). Identical words are read differently in different languages. Psychological Science, 12, 379–384.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
