Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Reaction times exhibit a spectral patterning known as 1/f, and these patterns can be thought of as reflecting time-varying changes in attention. We investigated the shot structure of Hollywood films to determine if these same patterns are found. We parsed 150 films with release dates from 1935 to 2005 into their sequences of shots and then analyzed the pattern of shot lengths in each film. Autoregressive and power analyses showed that, across that span of 70 years, shots became increasingly more correlated in length with their neighbors and created power spectra approaching 1/f. We suggest, as have others, that 1/f patterns reflect world structure and mental process. Moreover, a 1/f temporal shot structure may help harness observers’ attention to the narrative of a film.

Keywords

attention cinema film visual momentum

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

J.D.

(1996). The reality of illusion: An ecological approach to cognitive film theory. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

Antrobus

J.S.

(1968). Information theory and stimulus-dependent-thought. British Journal of Psychology, 59, 423–430.

Bordwell

(2006). The way Hollywood tells it. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Bordwell

Staiger

Thompson

(1985). The classical Hollywood cinema: Film style & mode of production to 1960. New York: Columbia University Press.

Box

G.E.P.

Jenkins

G.M.

Reinsel

G.C.

(2008). Time series analysis: Forecasting and control (4th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Carey

(1974). Temporal and spatial transitions in American fiction films. Studies in the Anthropology of Visual Communication, 1, 45–50.

Carroll

J.M.

Bever

T.G.

(1976). Segmentation in cinema perception. Science, 191, 1053–1056.

Chatfield

(2004). The analysis of time series (6th ed.). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.

Cowan

(1995). Attention and memory: An integrated framework. New York: Oxford University Press.

10.

Dmytryk

(1984). On film editing. Boston: Focal Press.

11.

Farrell

Wagenmakers

E.-J.

Ratcliff

(2006). 1/f noise in human cognition: Is it ubiquitous, and what does it mean? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 737–741.

12.

Field

D.J.

(1987). Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 4, 2379–2394.

13.

Gilden

D.L.

(2001). Cognitive emission of 1/f noise. Psychological Review, 108, 33–56.

14.

Gilden

D.L.

Hancock

(2007). Response variability in attention deficit disorders. Psychological Science, 18, 796–802.

15.

Gilden

D.L.

Thornton

Mallon

M.W.

(1995). 1/f noise in human cognition. Science, 267, 1837–1839.

16.

Graham

D.J.

Field

D.J.

(2007). Statistical regularities of art images and natural scenes: Spectra, sparseness, and nonlinearities. Spatial Vision, 21, 149–164.

17.

Hochberg

Brooks

(1978a). Film cutting and visual momentum. In Senders

J.W.

Fisher

D.F.

Monty

R.A.

(Eds.), Eye movements and the higher psychological functions (pp. 293–313). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

18.

Hochberg

Brooks

(1978b). The perception of motion pictures. In Carterette

E.C.

Friedman

M.P.

(Eds.), Handbook of perception: Vol. 10. Cognitive ecology (pp. 259–304). New York: Academic Press.

19.

James

(1890). The principles of psychology (Vol. 1). New York: Holt.

20.

Kael

(1965). I lost it at the movies. Boston: Little, Brown.

21.

Luck

S.J.

Vecera

S.P.

(2002). Attention. In Pashler

Yantis

(Eds.), Stevens’ handbook of experimental psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 235–286). New York: Wiley.

22.

Messaris

(1994). Visual literacy: Image, mind, & reality. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

23.

Monto

Palva

Voipio

Palva

J.M.

(2008). Very slow EEG fluctuations predict the dynamics of stimulus detection and oscillation amplitudes in humans. Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 8268–8272.

24.

Newman

M.E.J.

(2005). Power laws, Pareto distributions, and Zipf’s law. Contemporary Physics, 46, 323–351.

25.

Nothelfer

C.E.

DeLong

J.E.

Cutting

J.E.

(2009). Shot structure in Hollywood film. Indiana University Undergraduate Journal of Cognitive Science, 4, 103–113.

26.

Ondaatje

(2004). The conversations: Walter Murch and the art of editing film. New York: Random House.

27.

Over

Ianeva

Kraaij

Smeaton

A.F.

(2007). TRECVID 2006—an overview. In Proceedings of TRECVID 2006. Retrieved December 21, 2009, from http://doras.dcu.ie/430/1/trecvid_2006_3.pdf

28.

Parasuraman

(1986). Vigilance, monitoring, and search. In Boff

B.R.

Kaufman

Thomas

J.P.

(Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance (Vol. 2, chap. 43). New York: Wiley.

29.

Pressing

Jolley-Rogers

(1997). Spectral properties of human cognition and skill. Biological Cybernetics, 76, 339–347.

30.

Richards

Wilson

H.R.

Sommer

M.A.

(1994). Chaos in percepts? Biological Cybernetics, 70, 345–349.

31.

Salt

(1992). Film style and technology: History and analysis (2nd ed.). London: Starword.

32.

Salt

(2006). Moving into pictures. London: Starword.

33.

Schils

de Haan

(1993). Characteristics of sentence length in running text. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 8, 20–26.

34.

Smallwood

Schooler

J.W.

(2006). The restless mind. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 946–958.

35.

Smith

T.J.

(2006). An attentional theory of continuity editing (Doctoral thesis, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland). Retrieved June 25, 2009, from http://continuityboy.blogspot.com/2006/03/attentional-theory-of-continuity.html

36.

Thompson

(1999). Storytelling in the new Hollywood. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

37.

Thornton

T.L.

Gilden

D.L.

(2005). Provenance of correlations in psychological data. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 409–441.

38.

Van Orden

G.C.

Holden

J.G.

Turvey

M.T.

(2003). Self-organization of cognitive performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 152, 331–350.

39.

Verplanck

W.S.

Collier

G.H.

Cotton

J.W.

(1952). Nonindependence of successive responses in measurements of the visual threshold. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 273–282.

40.

Voss

R.F.

Clarke

(1975). ‘1/f noise’ in music and speech. Nature, 258, 317–318.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.03 MB

Attention and the Evolution of Hollywood Film

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material