Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

People often prefer familiar stimuli, presumably because familiarity signals safety. This preference can occur with merely repeated old stimuli, but it is most robust with new but highly familiar prototypes of a known category (beauty-in-averageness effect). However, is familiarity always warm? Tuning accounts of mood hold that positive mood signals a safe environment, whereas negative mood signals an unsafe environment. Thus, the value of familiarity should depend on mood. We show that compared with a sad mood, a happy mood eliminates the preference for familiar stimuli, as shown in measures of self-reported liking and physiological measures of affect (electromyographic indicator of spontaneous smiling). The basic effect of exposure on preference and its modulation by mood were most robust for prototypes (category averages). All this occurs even though prototypes might be more familiar in a happy mood. We conclude that mood changes the hedonic implications of familiarity cues.

Keywords

emotions memory electrophysiology preferences judgment

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bornstein

R.F.

(1989). Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 265–289.

Cacioppo

J.T.

Petty

R.E.

Losch

M.E.

Kim

H.S.

(1986). Electromyographic activity over facial muscle regions can differentiate the valence and intensity of affective reactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 260–268.

Clore

G.L.

Schwarz

Conway

(1994). Affective causes and consequences of social information processing. In Wyer

R.S.

Srull

T.K.

(Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 323–418). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Dawson

M.E.

Schell

A.M.

Filion

D.L.

(2000). The electrodermal system. In Cacioppo

J.T.

Tassinary

L.G.

Berntson

G.G.

(Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (pp. 200–223). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Deese

(1959). On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 17–22.

Freitas

A.L.

Azizian

Travers

Berry

S.A.

(2005). The evaluative connotation of processing fluency: Inherently positive or moderated by motivational context? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 636–644.

Goldinger

S.D.

Hansen

W.A.

(2005). Remembering by the seat of your pants. Psychological Science, 16, 525–529.

Gordon

P.C.

Holyoak

K.J.

(1983). Implicit learning and generalization of the “mere exposure” effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 492–500.

Halberstadt

(2006). The generality and ultimate origins of the attractiveness of prototypes. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 166–183.

10.

Harmon-Jones

Allen

J.B.

(2001). The role of affect in the mere exposure effect: Evidence from psychophysiological and individual differences approaches. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 889–898.

11.

Hertwig

Herzog

S.M.

Schooler

L.J.

Reimer

(2008). Fluency heuristic: A model of how the mind exploits a by-product of information retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 1191–1206.

12.

Langlois

J.H.

Roggman

L.A.

(1990). Attractive faces are only average. Psychological Science, 1, 115–121.

13.

Monin

(2003). The warm glow heuristic: When liking leads to familiarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 1035–1048.

14.

Morris

A.L.

Cleary

A.M.

Still

M.S.

(2008). The role of autonomic arousal in feelings of familiarity. Consciousness and Cognition, 17, 1378–1385.

15.

Posner

M.I.

Keele

S.W.

(1968). On the genesis of abstract ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 353–363.

16.

Rhodes

Sumich

Byatt

(1999). Are average facial configurations attractive only because of their symmetry? Psychological Science, 10, 52–58.

17.

Schwarz

(2002). Situated cognition and the wisdom of feelings: Cognitive tuning. In Barrett

L.F.

Salovey

(Eds.), The wisdom in feeling (pp. 144–166). New York: Guilford Press.

18.

Shore

A.N.

(1994). Affect regulation and the origin of the self: The neurobiology of emotional development. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

19.

Storbeck

Clore

G.L.

(2005). With sadness comes accuracy; with happiness false memory: Mood and the false memory effect. Psychological Science, 16, 785–791.

20.

Thornhill

Gangestad

S.W.

(1993). Human facial beauty: Averageness, symmetry and parasite resistance. Human Nature, 4, 237–269.

21.

Titchener

E.B.

(1915). A beginner’s psychology. New York: Macmillan.

22.

Tranel

Damasio

A.R.

(1985). Knowledge without awareness: An automatic index of facial recognition by prosopagnosics. Science, 228, 1453–1454.

23.

Whittlesea

B.W.A.

(2002). False memory and the discrepancy-attribution hypothesis: The prototype-familiarity illusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 96–115.

24.

Whittlesea

B.W.A.

Price

J.R.

(2001). Implicit/explicit memory versus analytic/nonanalytic processing: Re-thinking the mere exposure effect. Memory & Cognition, 29, 234–246.

25.

Winkielman

Cacioppo

J.T.

(2001). Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: Psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation leads to positive affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 989–1000.

26.

Winkielman

Halberstadt

Fazendeiro

Catty

(2006). Prototypes are attractive because they are easy on the mind. Psychological Science, 17, 799–806.

27.

Winkielman

Schwarz

Fazendeiro

Reber

(2003). The hedonic marking of processing fluency: Implications for evaluative judgment. In Musch

Klauer

K.C.

(Eds.), The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion (pp. 189–217). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

28.

Zajonc

R.B.

(1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 1–27.

29.

Zajonc

R.B.

(2001). Mere exposure: A gateway to the subliminal. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 224–228.

30.

Zuckerman

(2005). Psychobiology of personality (2nd ed.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.06 MB

Happiness Cools the Warm Glow of Familiarity

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material