Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Phone calls encouraging citizens to vote are staples of modern campaigns. Insights from psychological science can make these calls dramatically more potent while also generating opportunities to expand psychological theory. We present a field experiment conducted during the 2008 presidential election (N = 287,228) showing that facilitating the formation of a voting plan (i.e., implementation intentions) can increase turnout by 4.1 percentage points among those contacted, but a standard encouragement call and self-prediction have no significant impact. Among single-eligible-voter households, the formation of a voting plan increased turnout among persons contacted by 9.1 percentage points, whereas those in multiple-eligible-voter households were unaffected by all scripts. Some situational factors may organically facilitate implementation-intentions formation more readily than others; we present data suggesting that this could explain the differential treatment effect that we found. We discuss implications for psychological and political science, and public interventions involving implementation-intentions formation.

Keywords

implementation intentions self-prediction voting nudges

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Angrist

Imbens

Rubin

(1996). Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91, 444–456.

Blais

(2000). To vote or not to vote: The merits and limits of rational choice theory. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.

Dholakia

U.M.

Bagozzi

R.P.

(2003). As time goes by: How goal and implementation intentions influence enactment of short-fuse behaviors. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 889–922.

Gerber

A.S.

Green

D.P.

(2000). The effects of canvassing, telephone calls, and direct mail on voter turnout: A field experiment. American Political Science Review, 94, 653.

Gollwitzer

P.M.

(1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54, 493–503.

Gollwitzer

P.M.

Bayer

McCulloch

(2005). The control of the unwanted. In Hassin

Uleman

Bargh

J.A.

(Eds.), The new unconscious (pp. 485–515). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

Gollwitzer

P.M.

Sheeran

(2006). Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 69–119.

Green

D.P.

Gerber

A.S.

(2008). Get out the vote! Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

Greenwald

A.G.

Carnot

C.G.

Beach

Young

(1987). Increasing voting-behavior by asking people if they expect to vote. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 315–318.

10.

Greenwald

A.G.

Klinger

M.R.

Vande Kamp

M.E.

Kerr

K.L.

(1988). The self-prophecy effect: Increasing voter turnout by vanity-assisted consciousness raising. Unpublished manuscript, University of Washington, Seattle.

11.

Johnson

(2008, June 24). Doctors renew health advice. Washington Post. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/20/AR2008062002570.html

12.

Lippke

Ziegelmann

J.P.

(2002). Self-regulation and exercise: A study on stages of change and successful aging. Unpublished manuscript, Free University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

13.

Milne

Orbell

Sheeran

(2002). Combining motivational and volitional interventions to promote exercise participation: Protection motivation theory and implementation intentions. British Journal of Health Psychology, 7, 163.

14.

Morwitz

V.G.

Johnson

Schmittlein

(1993). Does measuring intent change behavior? Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 46–61.

15.

Nickerson

D.W.

(2006). Volunteer phone calls can increase turnout. American Politics Research, 34, 271–292.

16.

Nickerson

D.W.

(2007). Quality is job one: Professional and volunteer voter mobilization calls. American Journal of Political Science, 51, 269–282.

17.

Sherman

S.J.

(1980). On the self-erasing nature of errors of prediction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 211–221.

18.

Smith

J.K.

Gerber

A.S.

Orlich

(2003). Self-prophecy effects and voter turnout: An experimental replication. Political Psychology, 24, 593–604.

19.

Thaler

R.H.

Sunstein

C.R.

(2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.06 MB

Do You Have a Voting Plan?

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material