AnstisS. (2005). Homage to Peter Thompson: The Tony Blair illusion. Perception, 34, 1417–1420.
2.
BartlettJ.C.SearcyJ. (1993). Inversion and configuration of faces. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 281–316.
3.
DiamondR.CareyS. (1986). Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 107–117.
4.
EnnsJ.T.ShoreD.I. (1997). Separate influences of orientation and lighting in the inverted-face effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 23–31.
5.
HarrisA.AguirreG.K. (2008). The representation of parts and wholes in face-selective cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 863–878.
6.
HillH.BruceV. (1993). Independent effects of lighting, orientation, and stereopsis on the hollow-face illusion. Perception, 22, 887–897.
7.
HillH.BruceV. (1996). Effects of lighting on the perception of facial surfaces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 986–1004.
8.
KleffnerD.A.RamachandranV.S. (1992). On the perception of shape from shading. Perception & Psychophysics, 52, 18–36.
9.
MaurerD.Le GrandR.MondlochC.J. (2002). The many faces of configural processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 255–260.
10.
McKoneE.YovelG. (2009). Why does picture-plane inversion sometimes dissociate perception of features and spacing in faces and sometimes not? Towards a new theory of holistic processing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 778–797.
11.
McMullenP.A.ShoreD.I.HendersonR.B. (2000). Testing a two-component model of face identification: Effects of inversion, contrast reversal, and direction of lighting. Perception, 29, 609–619.
12.
MurrayJ.E.YongE.RhodesG. (2000). Revisiting the perception of upside-down faces. Psychological Science, 11, 492–496.
13.
PetersonM.A.RhodesG. (2003). Analytic and holistic processing—the view through different lenses. In PetersonM.A.RhodesG. (Eds.), Perception of faces, objects, and scenes: Analytic and holistic processes (pp. 3–19). New York: Oxford University Press.
14.
RamachandranV.S. (1988). Perception of shape from shading. Nature (London), 331, 163–166.
15.
RhodesG.BrakeS.AtkinsonA.P. (1993). What’s lost in inverted faces?Cognition, 47, 25–57.
16.
RhodesG.HaywardW.G.WinklerC. (2006). Expert face coding: Configural and component coding of own-race and other-race faces. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 499–505.
17.
RhodesG.JefferyL. (2009). The Thatcher illusion: Now you see it, now you don’t. Perception, 38, 927–929.
18.
RossionB. (2008). Picture-plane inversion leads to qualitative changes of face perception. Acta Psychologica, 128, 274–289.
19.
ThompsonP. (1980). Margaret Thatcher: A new illusion. Perception, 9, 483–484.
20.
YinR.K. (1969). Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 141–145.