Most studies of animal cognition focus on group performance and neglect individual differences and the correlational structure of cognitive abilities. Moreover, no previous studies have compared the correlational structure of cognitive abilities in nonhuman animals and humans. We compared the structure of individual differences of 106 chimpanzees and 105 two-year-old human children using 15 cognitive tasks that posed problems about the physical or social world. We found a similar factor of spatial cognition for the two species. But whereas the chimpanzees had only a single factor in addition to spatial cognition, the children had two distinct additional factors: one for physical cognition and one for social cognition. These findings, in combination with previous research, support the proposal that humans share many cognitive skills with nonhuman apes, especially for dealing with the physical world, but in addition have evolved some specialized skills of social cognition.
AggletonJ.E.HuntE.R.RawlinsJ.N.P. (1986). The effects of hippocampal lesions upon spatial and non-spatial tests of working memory. Behavioral Brain Research, 19, 133–146.
2.
AndersonB. (1993). Evidence from the rat for a general factor that underlies cognitive performance and that relates to brain size: Intelligence?Neuroscience Letters, 153, 98–112.
3.
BittermanM.E. (1965). The evolution of intelligence. Scientific American, 212, 92–100.
4.
BorsboomD.DolanC.V. (2006). Why g is not an adaptation: A comment on Kanazawa (2004). Psychological Review, 113, 433–437.
5.
CallJ.TomaselloM. (2008). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? 30 years later. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 187–192.
6.
CrinellaE.M.YuJ. (1995). Brain mechanisms in problem solving and intelligence: A replication and extension. Intelligence, 21, 225–246.
7.
DavenportJ.W.HagquistW.W.RankinG.R. (1970). The symmetrical maze: An automated closed-field test series for rats. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 2, 112–118.
8.
DeanerR.O.van SchaikC.P.JohnsonV.E. (2006). Do some taxa have better domain-general cognition than others? A meta-analysis of nonhuman primate studies. Evolutionary Psychology, 4, 149–196.
9.
GalsworthyM.J.Paya-CanoJ.L.MonleonS.GregoryanG.FernandesC.SchalkwykL.C.. (2005). Assessing reliability, heritability and general cognitive ability in a battery of cognitive tasks for laboratory mice. Behavior Genetics, 35, 675–692.
10.
HareB. (2007). From nonhuman to human mind: What changed and why. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 60–64.
11.
HerrmannE.CallJ.Hernández-LloredaM.V.HareB.TomaselloM. (2007). Humans have evolved specialized skills of social cognition: The cultural intelligence hypothesis. Science, 317, 1360–1366.
JöreskogK.G.SörbomD. (2006). LISREL 8.80 for Windows [Computer software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
14.
KamilA.C. (1988). A synthetic approach to the study of animal intelligence. In LegerD.W. (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation: Vol. 35. Comparative perspectives in modern psychology (pp. 257–308). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
15.
LattinJ.CarrollD.J.GreenP.E. (2003). Analyzing multivariate data. Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury Press.
16.
LeeJ.J. (2007). A g beyond Homo sapiens? Some hints and suggestions. Intelligence, 35, 253–265.
17.
LocurtoC.BenoitA.CrowleyC.MieleA. (2006). The structure of individual differences in batteries of rapid acquisition tasks in mice. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 120, 378–388.
18.
LocurtoC.FortinE.SullivanR. (2003). The structure of individual differences in heterogeneous strain mice across problem types and motivational conditions. Genes, Brain, and Behavior, 2, 1–16.
19.
LocurtoC.ScanlonC. (1998). Individual differences and a spatial learning factor in two strains of mice. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 112, 344–352.
20.
Lorenzo-SevaU. (1999). Promin: A method for oblique factor rotation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 34, 347–356.
21.
Lorenzo-SevaU.FerrandoP.J. (2006). FACTOR: A computer program to fit the exploratory factor analysis model. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 38, 88–91.
22.
MatzelL.D.HanY.R.GrossmanH.KarnikM.S.PatelD.ScottN.. (2003). Individual differences in the expression of a “general” learning ability in mice. Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 6423–6433.
MulaikS.A.JamesL.R.van AlstineJ.BennettN.LindS.StillwellC.D. (1989). Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 430–445.
25.
PlominR. (1988). The nature and nurture of cognitive abilities. In SternbergR.J. (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (pp. 11–33). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
26.
SchreiberJ.B.StageF.K.KingJ.NoraA.BarlowE.A. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99, 323–337.
ShettleworthS.J. (1998). Cognition, evolution, and behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.
29.
SternbergR.J. (1999). Successful intelligence: Finding a balance. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 436–442.
30.
SternbergR.J. (2004). International handbook of intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
31.
ThompsonR.CrinellaF.M.YuJ. (1990). Brain mechanisms in problem solving and intelligence: A lesion survey of the rat brain. New York: Plenum.
32.
ThorndikeR.L. (1935). Organization of behavior in the albino rat. Psychological Monographs, 17, 1–70.
33.
ThurstoneL.L. (1938). Primary mental abilities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
34.
ThurstoneL.L. (1947). Multiple factor analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35.
TomaselloM.CallJ. (1997). Primate cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.
36.
TomaselloM.CarpenterM.CallJ.BehneT.MollH. (2005). Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 675–691.
37.
UpchurchM.WehnerJ.M. (1989). Inheritance of spatial learning ability in inbred mice: A classical genetic analysis. Behavioral Neuroscience, 103, 1251–1258.
38.
van der MaasH.L.J.DolanC.V.GrasmanR.P.P.P.WichertsJ.M.HuizengaH.M.RaijmakersM.E.J. (2006). A dynamical model of general intelligence: The positive manifold of intelligence by mutualism. Psychological Review, 113, 842–861.
39.
van DrielO.P. (1978). On various causes of improper solutions in maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 4, 225–243.
WellmanH.M.Lopez-DuranS.LaBountJ.HamiltonB. (2008). Infant attention to intentional action predicts preschool theory of mind. Developmental Psychology, 44, 618–623.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
