Abstract
The prickly subject of source protection took centre stage once more towards the end of last year in the United States when a slew of court actions demanding that reporters reveal sources saw journalists awarded jail sentences and, subsequently, the introduction of a federal "shield" law that would provide "absolute protection" for confidential sources. Democrat senator Christopher Dodd's "Free Speech Protection Act of 2004" is designed to prevent the compelled disclosure of sources ? "regardless of whether or not the source was promised confidentiality". Source protection remains a dilemma throughout journalism and if print journalism is to survive as a truly free press in the third millennium, it will have to re-define the extent to which it can genuinely protect those on the cutting edge of serious investigative research. A starting point to establishing the rights of the investigative reporter is a workable policy on source protection and the acknowledgement of the need to protect genuine confidential sources...whatever the price
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
