OgazDMullenDBaldryG, et al.The waiting room: unmet sexual health service needs among men and gender-diverse individuals having sex with men in England, findings from an online, cross-sectional community survey in 2024. Int J STD AIDS2026; 37: 538–547. https://doi.org/10.1177/09564624251413004
2.
FoucaultM. La Volonté De Savoir. Gallimard, 1976.
3.
MooreSSouleymanovR. Risky subjectivities and ‘Risk’ as governance among key and priority populations in Canada: a foucauldian discourse analysis. Crit Public Health2025; 35: 2532633. https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2025.2532633
4.
MinichielloVScottJGrovC, et al.The role of social science in shaping the Sexually Transmitted Diseases (STI) discourse. In: LiamputtongP (ed). Handbook of Social Sciences and Global Public Health. Springer International Publishing, pp. 1–17.
5.
YaminAE. The right to health under international law and its relevance to the United States. Am J Publ Health2005; 95: 1156–1161. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2004.055111
6.
RiedelE. The right to health under the ICESCR: existing scope, new challenges and how to deal with it. In: von ArnauldAvon der DeckenKSusiM (eds). The Cambridge Handbook of New Human Rights: Recognition, Novelty, Rhetoric. Cambridge University Press, pp. 107–123.
7.
PizzarossaLBPerehudoffK. Global survey of national constitutions: mapping constitutional commitments to sexual and reproductive health and rights. Health and Human Rights2017; 19: 279–293.
8.
PizzarossaLB. Here to stay: the evolution of sexual and reproductive health and rights in international human rights law. Laws2018; 7: 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws7030029