The British Association for Sexual Health and HIV United Kingdom guideline on the management of non-gonococcal urethritis (NGU) 2026 provides details on the aetiology and clinical features of NGU, with recommendations on diagnosis and treatment of acute and persistent/recurrent NGU. Non-gonococcal urethritis is characterised by urethral inflammation, and it can be infectious or non-infectious. The most common organisms causing NGU are Chlamydia trachomatis and Mycoplasma genitalium. Diagnosis of NGU is based on clinical history and evidence of an excess of polymorphonuclear leucocytes in the anterior urethra of symptomatic men. Nucleic acid amplification tests to determine the specific aetiology are used to guide treatment and reduce complications. Recommendations include advising patients to abstain from sexual intercourse until they and their partner(s) have completed treatment and follow-up to prevent re-infection.
HornerPBleeKO'MahonyC, et al.2015 UK National Guideline on the management of non-gonococcal urethritis. Int J STD AIDS2016; 27: 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956462415586675
SrinivasanSChambersLCTapiaKA, et al.Urethral microbiota in men: association of Haemophilus influenzae and Mycoplasma penetrans with nongonococcal urethritis. Clin Infect Dis2020; 73: e1684–e1693. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa1123
4.
PondMJNoriAVWitneyAA, et al.High prevalence of antibiotic-resistant Mycoplasma genitalium in nongonococcal urethritis: the need for routine testing and the inadequacy of current treatment options. Clin Infect Dis2014; 58: 631–637. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cit752
5.
LeungAEastickKHaddonLE, et al.Mycoplasma genitalium is associated with symptomatic urethritis. Int J STD AIDS2006; 17: 285–288. https://doi.org/10.1258/095646206776790231
6.
ItoSHanaokaNShimutaK, et al.Male non-gonococcal urethritis: from microbiological etiologies to demographic and clinical features. Int J Urol2016; 23: 325–331. https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.13044
7.
FrølundMLidbrinkPWikströmA, et al.Urethritis-associated pathogens in urine from men with non-gonococcal urethritis: a case-control study. Acta Derm Venereol2016; 96: 689–694. https://doi.org/10.2340/00015555-2314
8.
SenaACLensingSRompaloA, et al.Chlamydia trachomatis, Mycoplasma genitalium, and Trichomonas vaginalis infections in men with nongonococcal urethritis: predictors and persistence after therapy. J Infect Dis2012; 206: 357–365. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jis356
9.
WetmoreCMManhartLELowensMS, et al.Ureaplasma urealyticum is associated with nongonococcal urethritis among men with fewer lifetime sexual partners: a case-control study. J Infect Dis2011; 204: 1274–1282. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jir517
10.
HornerPThomasBGilroyCB, et al.Role of Mycoplasma genitalium and Ureaplasma urealyticum in acute and chronic nongonococcal urethritis. Clin Infect Dis2001; 32: 995–1003. https://doi.org/10.1086/319594
11.
ManhartLEGillespieCWLowensMS, et al.Standard treatment regimens for nongonococcal urethritis have similar but declining cure rates: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Infect Dis2013; 56: 934–942. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cis1022
12.
SchwebkeJRRompaloATaylorS, et al.Re-evaluating the treatment of nongonococcal urethritis: emphasizing emerging pathogens--a randomized clinical trial. Clin Infect Dis2011; 52: 163–170. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciq074
13.
KhatibNBradburyCChalkerV, et al.Prevalence of Trichomonas vaginalis, Mycoplasma genitalium and Ureaplasma urealyticum in men with urethritis attending an urban sexual health clinic. Int J STD AIDS2015; 26: 388–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956462414539464
14.
SmithRCopasAJPrinceM, et al.Poor sensitivity and consistency of microscopy in the diagnosis of low grade non-gonococcal urethritis. Sex Transm Infect2003; 79: 487–490. https://doi.org/10.1136/sti.79.6.487
15.
WillcoxJRAdlerMWBelseyEM. Observer variation in the interpretation of Gram-stained urethral smears: implications for the diagnosis of non-specific urethritis. Br J Vener Dis1981; 57: 134–136. https://doi.org/10.1136/sti.57.2.134
16.
FrolundMFalkLAhrensP, et al.Detection of ureaplasmas and bacterial vaginosis associated bacteria and their association with non-gonococcal urethritis in men. PLoS One2019; 14: e0214425. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214425
17.
JordanSJTohEWilliamsJA, et al.Aetiology and prevalence of mixed-infections and mono-infections in non-gonococcal urethritis in men: a case-control study. Sex Transm Infect2020; 96: 306–311. https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2019-054121
18.
MoiHReintonNRandjelovicI, et al.Urethral inflammatory response to ureaplasma is significantly lower than to Mycoplasma genitalium and Chlamydia trachomatis. Int J STD AIDS2017; 28: 773–780. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956462416666482
19.
OndondoROWhittingtonWLAsteteSG, et al.Differential association of ureaplasma species with non-gonococcal urethritis in heterosexual men. Sex Transm Infect2010; 86: 271–275. https://doi.org/10.1136/sti.2009.040394
20.
McIverRJaloconDMcNultyA, et al.Men who have sex with men with mycoplasma genitalium-positive nongonococcal urethritis are more likely to have macrolide-resistant strains than men with only female partners: a prospective study. Sex Transm Dis2019; 46: 513–517. https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001009
21.
OvensKJReynolds-WrightJJCrossELA, et al.High rates of treatment failure for Mycoplasma genitalium among men and women attending a sexual health clinic. BMJ Sex Reprod Health2020; 46: 132–138. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsrh-2019-200384
22.
KhosropourCMManhartLEGillespieCW, et al.Efficacy of standard therapies against Ureaplasma species and persistence among men with non-gonococcal urethritis enrolled in a randomised controlled trial. Sex Transm Infect2015; 91: 308–313. https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2014-051859
23.
FrolundMWikstromALidbrinkP, et al.The bacterial microbiota in first-void urine from men with and without idiopathic urethritis. PLoS One2018; 13: e0201380. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201380
24.
RaneVSFairleyCKWeerakoonA, et al.Characteristics of acute nongonococcal urethritis in men differ by sexual preference. J Clin Microbiol2014; 52: 2971–2976. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00899-14
25.
WetmoreCMManhartLELowensMS, et al.Demographic, behavioral, and clinical characteristics of men with nongonococcal urethritis differ by etiology: a case-comparison study. Sex Transm Dis2011; 38: 180–186. https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3182040de9
26.
HornerPJThomasBGilroyCB, et al.Do all men attending departments of genitourinary medicine need to be screened for non-gonococcal urethritis?Int J STD AIDS2002; 13: 667–673. https://doi.org/10.1258/095646202760326408
27.
JordanSJTohEWilliamsJA, et al.No pathogen-specific sign or symptom predicts the etiology of monomicrobial nongonococcal urethritis in men. Sex Transm Dis2020; 47: 329–331. https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001158
28.
HornerPJTaylor-RobinsonD. Association of Mycoplasma genitalium with balanoposthitis in men with non-gonococcal urethritis. Sex Transm Infect2010; 87: 38–40. https://doi.org/10.1136/sti.2010.044487
29.
HornerPJGilroyCBThomasBJ, et al.Association of Mycoplasma genitalium with acute non-gonococcal urethritis. Lancet1993; 342: 582–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-6736(93)91411-e
30.
ShimadaYItoSMizutaniK, et al.Bacterial loads of Ureaplasma urealyticum contribute to development of urethritis in men. Int J STD AIDS2014; 25: 294–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956462413504556
31.
HornerPDondersGCusiniM, et al.Should we be testing for urogenital Mycoplasma hominis, Ureaplasma parvum and Ureaplasma urealyticum in men and women? - A position statement from the European STI Guidelines Editorial Board. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol2018; 32: 1845–1851. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.15146
32.
DeguchiTShimadaYHorieK, et al.Bacterial loads of Ureaplasma parvum contribute to the development of inflammatory responses in the male urethra. Int J STD AIDS2015; 26: 1035–1039. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956462414565796
33.
ZhangNWangRLiX, et al.Are Ureaplasma spp. a cause of nongonococcal urethritis? A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One2014; 9: e113771. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113771
34.
MoiHHartgillUSkullerudKH, et al.Microscopy of stained urethral smear in male urethritis; which cutoff should be used?Sex Transm Dis2017; 44: 189–194. https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000565
35.
CoxCMcKennaJPWattAP, et al.Ureaplasma parvum and Mycoplasma genitalium are found to be significantly associated with microscopy-confirmed urethritis in a routine genitourinary medicine setting. Int J STD AIDS2016; 27: 861–867. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956462415597620
36.
PlummerELRattenLKVodstrcilLA, et al.The urethral microbiota of men with and without idiopathic urethritis. mBio2022; 13: e0221322. https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.02213-22
37.
Magdaleno-TapialJValenzuela-OnateCGiacaman-von der WethMM, et al.Haemophilus species isolated in urethral exudates as a possible causative agent in acute urethritis: a study of 38 cases. Actas Dermo-Sifiliográficas2019; 110: 38–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ad.2018.09.003
38.
DezaGMartin-EzquerraGGomezJ, et al.Isolation of Haemophilus influenzae and Haemophilus parainfluenzae in urethral exudates from men with acute urethritis: a descriptive study of 52 cases. Sex Transm Infect2016; 92: 29–31. https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2015-052135
39.
CarneCAGibbsJDelaneyA, et al.Prevalence, clinical features and quantification of genital non-viral infections. Int J STD AIDS2013; 24: 273–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956462412472306
40.
NichollsJETurnerKMENorthP, et al.Cross-sectional study to evaluate Trichomonas vaginalis positivity in women tested for Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis, attending genitourinary medicine and primary care clinics in Bristol, South West England. Sex Transm Infect2018; 94: 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2016-052942
41.
MitchellHDLewisDAMarshK, et al.Distribution and risk factors of Trichomonas vaginalis infection in England: an epidemiological study using electronic health records from sexually transmitted infection clinics, 2009–2011. Epidemiol Infect2014; 142: 1678–1687. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268813002902
42.
TohEGangaiahDBatteigerBE, et al.Neisseria meningitidis ST11 complex isolates associated with nongonococcal urethritis, Indiana, USA, 2015-2016. Emerg Infect Dis2017; 23: 336–339. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2302.161434
43.
BazanJAPetersonASKirkcaldyRD, et al.Notes from the field: increase in Neisseria meningitidis-associated urethritis among men at two sentinel clinics - Columbus, Ohio, and Oakland County, Michigan, 2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep2016; 65: 550–552. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6521a5
44.
KeaneFEThomasBJWhitakerL, et al.An association between non-gonococcal urethritis and bacterial vaginosis and the implications for patients and their sexual partners. Genitourin Med1997; 73: 373–377. https://doi.org/10.1136/sti.73.5.373
45.
ManhartLEKhosropourCMLiuC, et al.Bacterial vaginosis-associated bacteria in men: association of Leptotrichia/Sneathia spp. with nongonococcal urethritis. Sex Transm Dis2013; 40: 944–949. https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000054
46.
HawkinsDAFontaineEAThomasBJ, et al.The enigma of non-gonococcal urethritis: role for Bacteroides ureolyticus. Genitourin Med1988; 64: 10–13. https://doi.org/10.1136/sti.64.1.10
47.
SamaraweeraGRGarciaKDruceJ, et al.Characteristics of adenovirus urethritis among heterosexual men and men who have sex with men: a review of clinical cases. Sex Transm Infect2016; 92: 172–174. https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2015-052243
48.
HanaokaNItoSKonagayaM, et al.Infectious human adenoviruses are shed in urine even after disappearance of urethral symptoms. PLoS One2019; 14: e0212434. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212434
49.
BradshawCSTabriziSNReadTRH, et al.Etiologies of nongonococcal urethritis: bacteria, viruses, and the association with orogenital exposure. J Infect Dis2006; 193: 336–345. https://doi.org/10.1086/499434
50.
TonsbergEHartgillU. The urethral smear as a tool in diagnosing adenovirus-induced urethritis. Int J STD AIDS2014; 25: 1047–1049. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956462414531561
51.
ItoSYasudaMKondoH, et al.Clinical courses of herpes simplex virus-induced urethritis in men. J Infect Chemother2017; 23: 717–719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiac.2017.03.017
52.
OngJJMortonANHenzellHR, et al.Clinical characteristics of herpes simplex virus urethritis compared with chlamydial urethritis among men. Sex Transm Dis2017; 44: 121–125. https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000547
BerntssonMLowhagenGBBergstromT, et al.Viral and bacterial aetiologies of male urethritis: findings of a high prevalence of Epstein-Barr virus. Int J STD AIDS2010; 21: 191–194. https://doi.org/10.1258/ijsa.2009.009262
55.
LeungATaylorSSmithA, et al.Urinary tract infection in patients with acute non-gonococcal urethritis. Int J STD AIDS2002; 13: 801–804. https://doi.org/10.1258/095646202321020035
FalkLFredlundHJensenJS. Symptomatic urethritis is more prevalent in men infected with Mycoplasma genitalium than with Chlamydia trachomatis. Sex Transm Infect2004; 80: 289–293. https://doi.org/10.1136/sti.2003.006817
59.
SuttonAJRobertsTEJacksonL, et al.Cost-effectiveness of microscopy of urethral smears for asymptomatic Mycoplasma genitalium urethritis in men in England. Int J STD AIDS2018; 29: 72–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956462417717651
JordanSJSchwebkeJRAaronKJ, et al.Meatal swabs contain less cellular material and are associated with a decrease in gram stain smear quality compared to urethral swabs in men. J Clin Microbiol2017; 55: 2249–2254. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00423-17
62.
LeipertzGChambersLLowensS, et al.P796 reassessing the gram stain smear (GSS) polymorphonuclear leukocyte (PMN) cutoff for diagnosing non-gonococcal urethritis (NGU). Sex Transm Infect2019; 95: A339.
63.
ApoolaAHerrero-DiazMFitzHughE, et al.A randomised controlled trial to assess pain with urethral swabs. Sex Transm Infect2011; 87: 110–113. https://doi.org/10.1136/sti.2010.042861
64.
MoiHReintonNMoghaddamA. Mycoplasma genitalium is associated with symptomatic and asymptomatic non-gonococcal urethritis in men. Sex Transm Infect2009; 85: 15–18. https://doi.org/10.1136/sti.2008.032730
65.
PondMJNoriAVPatelS, et al.Performance evaluation of automated urine microscopy as a rapid, non-invasive approach for the diagnosis of non-gonococcal urethritis. Sex Transm Infect2015; 91: 165–170. https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2014-051761
66.
FraserPATeasdaleJGanKS, et al.Neutrophil enzymes in urine for the detection of urethral infection in men. Genitourin Med1995; 71: 176–179. https://doi.org/10.1136/sti.71.3.176
67.
PatrickDMRekartMLKnowlesL. Unsatisfactory performance of the leukocyte esterase test of first voided urine for rapid diagnosis of urethritis. Genitourin Med1994; 70: 187–190. https://doi.org/10.1136/sti.70.3.187
68.
JohnsonKASankaranMKohnRP, et al.Testing for Mycoplasma genitalium and using doxycycline as first-line therapy at initial presentations for non-gonococcal urethritis (NGU) correlate with reductions in persistent NGU. Clin Infect Dis2023; 76: 1674–1677. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciac977
BoylanJSundarSGardinerR, et al.P289 A cost-neutral rapid STI service implementation providing the right treatment at the right time to improve patient experience and outcomes. Sex Transm Infect2021; 97: A134.
75.
AdamsEJEhrlichATurnerKME, et al.Mapping patient pathways and estimating resource use for point of care versus standard testing and treatment of chlamydia and gonorrhoea in genitourinary medicine clinics in the UK. BMJ Open2014; 4: e005322. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005322
76.
CourtenayMCastro-SanchezEFitzpatrickM, et al.Tackling antimicrobial resistance 2019-2024 - the UK’s five-year national action plan. J Hosp Infect2019; 101: 426–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2019.02.019
77.
WalterSRJacksonJMyringG, et al.Impact of rapid near-patient STI testing on service delivery outcomes in an integrated sexual health service in the United Kingdom: a controlled interrupted time series study. BMJ Open2023; 13: e064664. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064664
78.
HornerPJCainDMcClureM, et al.Association of antibodies to Chlamydia trachomatis heat-shock protein 60 kD with chronic nongonococcal urethritis. Clin Infect Dis1997; 24: 653–660. https://doi.org/10.1093/clind/24.4.653
79.
HornerPThomasBGilroyC, et al.Antibodies to Chlamydia trachomatis heat-shock protein 60 kDa and detection of Mycoplasma genitalium and Ureaplasma urealyticum are associated independently with chronic nongonococcal urethritis. Sex Transm Dis2003; 30: 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007435-200302000-00007
80.
LomasDANatinDStockleyRA, et al.Chemotactic activity of urethral secretions in men with urethritis and the effect of treatment. J Infect Dis1993; 167: 233–236. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/167.1.233
81.
KongFYSTabriziSNLawM, et al.Azithromycin versus doxycycline for the treatment of genital chlamydia infection – a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Clin Infect Dis2014; 59: 193–205. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciu220
82.
KhosropourCMManhartLEColombaraDV, et al.Suboptimal adherence to doxycycline and treatment outcomes among men with non-gonococcal urethritis: a prospective cohort study. Sex Transm Infect2014; 90: 3–7. https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2013-051174
83.
MenaLAMroczkowskiTFNsuamiM, et al.A randomized comparison of azithromycin and doxycycline for the treatment of Mycoplasma genitalium-positive urethritis in men. Clin Infect Dis2009; 48: 1649–1654. https://doi.org/10.1086/599033
84.
DeguchiTItoSHatazakiK, et al.Antimicrobial susceptibility of Haemophilus influenzae strains isolated from the urethra of men with acute urethritis and/or epididymitis. J Infect Chemother2017; 23: 804–807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiac.2017.05.009
85.
CohenSSankaranMKohnRP, et al.Decline in persistent urethritis after change in clinical protocols for the diagnosis and management of non-gonococcal urethritis (NGU). Sex Transm Dis2022; 49: S32–S33.
86.
SoniSHornerPRaymentM, et al.British Association for Sexual Health and HIV national guideline for the management of infection with Mycoplasma genitalium (2018). Int J STD AIDS2019; 30: 938–950. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956462419825948
87.
HornerPJBleeKFalkL, et al.2016 European guideline on the management of non-gonococcal urethritis. Int J STD AIDS2016; 27: 928–937. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956462416648585
CherneskyMJangDChongS, et al.Impact of urine collection order on the ability of assays to identify Chlamydia trachomatis infections in men. Sex Transm Dis2003; 30: 345–347. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007435-200304000-00014
90.
HornerPJ. Editorial commentary: Mycoplasma genitalium and declining treatment efficacy of azithromycin 1 g: what can we do?Clin Infect Dis2015; 61: 1400–1402. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/civ649
91.
LauABradshawCSLewisD, et al.The efficacy of azithromycin for the treatment of genital Mycoplasma genitalium: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis2015; 61: 1389–1399. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/civ644
92.
CouldwellDLLewisDA. Mycoplasma genitalium infection: current treatment options, therapeutic failure, and resistance-associated mutations. Infect Drug Resist2015; 8: 147–161. https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S48813
93.
HornerPIngleSGarrettF, et al.P09.03 treatment of mycoplasma genitalium with azithromycin 1 g is less efficacious and associated with induction of macrolide resistance compared to a 5-day regimen. Sex Transm Infect2015; 91: A148. https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2015-052270.387
94.
HornerPBleeKAdamsE. Time to manage Mycoplasma genitalium as an STI: but not with azithromycin 1 g. Curr Opin Infect Dis2014; 27: 68–74. https://doi.org/10.1097/QCO.0000000000000030
95.
HandsfieldH. Management of herpetic urethritis and female partners of men with nongonococcal urethritis. Sex Transm Dis2017; 44: 131–133. https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000579
96.
KissingerPJWhiteSManhartLE, et al.Azithromycin treatment failure for Chlamydia trachomatis among heterosexual men with nongonococcal urethritis. Sex Transm Dis2016; 43: 599–602. https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000489
97.
KongFYSHornerPUnemoM, et al.Pharmacokinetic considerations regarding the treatment of bacterial sexually transmitted infections with azithromycin: a review. J Antimicrob Chemother2019; 74: 1157–1166. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dky548
98.
ReadTRHFairleyCKMurrayGL, et al.Outcomes of resistance-guided sequential treatment of Mycoplasma genitalium infections: a prospective evaluation. Clin Infect Dis2019; 68: 554–560. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciy477
FalkLEngerMJensenJS. Time to eradication of Mycoplasma genitalium after antibiotic treatment in men and women. J Antimicrob Chemother2015; 70: 3134–3140. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkv246
101.
HornerP. Azithromycin antimicrobial resistance and genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection: duration of therapy may be the key to improving efficacy. Sex Transm Infect2012; 88: 154–156. https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2011-050385
102.
UnemoMRossJSerwinAB, et al.European guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of gonorrhoea in adults. Int J STD AIDS2020; 2020: 956462420949126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956462420949126
103.
UnemoMRossJSerwinAB, et al.Background review for the ‘2020 European guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of gonorrhoea in adults’. Int J STD AIDS2021; 32: 108–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956462420948739
104.
StammWEBatteigerBEMcCormackWM, et al.A randomized, double-blind study comparing single-dose rifalazil with single-dose azithromycin for the empirical treatment of nongonococcal urethritis in men. Sex Transm Dis2007; 34: 545–552. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.olq.0000253348.44308.8c
105.
ItoSHatazakiKShimutaK, et al.Haemophilus influenzae isolated from men with acute urethritis: its pathogenic roles, responses to antimicrobial chemotherapies, and antimicrobial susceptibilities. Sex Transm Dis2017; 44: 205–210. https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000573
106.
JordanSTohEBatteigerT, et al.Prevalence and etiology of post-azithromycin persistent non-gonococcal urethritis (NGU) symptoms in men. Sex Transm Infect2019; 95: A338–A339.
107.
NgARossJD. Trichomonas vaginalis infection: how significant is it in men presenting with recurrent or persistent symptoms of urethritis?Int J STD AIDS2016; 27: 63–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956462415571372
108.
Taylor-RobinsonDGilroyCBThomasBJ, et al.Mycoplasma genitalium in chronic non-gonococcal urethritis. Int J STD AIDS2004; 15: 21–25. https://doi.org/10.1258/095646204322637209
109.
BowieWRAlexanderERStimsonJB, et al.Therapy for nongonococcal urethritis: double-blind randomized comparison of two doses and two durations of minocycline. Ann Intern Med1981; 95: 306–311. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-95-3-306
110.
ChambersLCHughesJPGlickSN, et al.Resolution of symptoms and resumption of sex after diagnosis of nongonococcal urethritis among men who have sex with men. Sex Transm Dis2019; 46: 676–682. https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001040
111.
HootonTMWongESBarnesRC, et al.Erythromycin for persistent or recurrent nongonococcal urethritis. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Intern Med1990; 113: 21–26. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-113-1-21
CroftsMMeadKPersadR, et al.How to manage the chronic pelvic pain syndrome in men presenting to sexual health services. Sex Transm Infect2014; 90: 370–373. https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2013-051432
ReesJAbrahamsMDobleA, et al.Diagnosis and treatment of chronic bacterial prostatitis and chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: a consensus guideline. BJU Int2015; 116: 509–525. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13101
116.
HornerPJCroftsMButterlyJ. How to effectively manage chronic pelvic pain syndrome in cis-gender men presenting to sexual health services using a holistic biopsychosocial approach. Sex Transm Infect2023; 100: 116.
CroftsMMeadKPersadR, et al.An evaluation of a dedicated chronic pelvic pain syndrome clinic in genitourinary medicine. Sex Transm Infect2014; 90: 373. https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2013-051433
119.
KenyonSCroftsMHornerP. An extended evaluation of a dedicated male chronic pelvic pain clinic within a sexual health service. Sex Transm Infect2014; 90: 572. https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2014-051770
120.
NickelJCBaranowskiAPPontariM, et al.Management of men diagnosed with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome who have failed traditional management. Rev Urol2007; 9: 63–72.
121.
SchneiderHWilbrandtKLudwigM, et al.Prostate-related pain in patients with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome. BJU Int2005; 95: 238–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05373.x
122.
OngJJSarumpaetAChowEPF, et al.Should female partners of men with non-gonococcal urethritis, negative for Chlamydia trachomatis and Mycoplasma genitalium, be informed and treated? Clinical outcomes from a partner study of heterosexual men with NGU. Sex Transm Dis2017; 44: 126–130. https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000546
123.
FitzgeraldMR. Effect of epidemiological treatment of contacts in preventing recurrences of non-gonococcal urethritis. Br J Vener Dis1984; 60: 312–315. https://doi.org/10.1136/sti.60.5.312
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
