A qualitative assessment of the factors influencing demand for PrEP among female college students in Durban,South Africa

Abstract

Background

Young women in South Africa experience a disproportionate burden of HIV transmission. Oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) offers an additional HIV prevention option; however, its acceptability and use among young, female university students remain underexplored.

Methods

This qualitative study explored perceptions, awareness, and acceptability of oral PrEP among female university students in Durban, South Africa. Semi-structured, in-depth interviews were conducted with 12 female students aged 18–24 years. Data were thematically analysed to identify key factors shaping PrEP awareness, attitudes, and perceived barriers and facilitators to use.

Results

Participants demonstrated varying levels of awareness of PrEP, often informed by informal sources such as peers, social media, and healthcare encounters. While PrEP was viewed as a potentially empowering HIV prevention option, misconceptions, fear of side effects, stigma associated with HIV-related medication, and concerns about partner reactions constrained acceptability and uptake. Structural barriers, including limited access to youth-friendly services, further influenced interest in PrEP.

Conclusion

The findings highlight the complex social and structural contexts shaping PrEP acceptability among female university students and point to the need for targeted, youth-friendly communication and service delivery approaches.

Keywords

PrEP HIV prevention awareness female students South Africa

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Statistics South Africa . Mid-year population estimates 2021. Statistics South Africa, 2021.

Human Sciences Research Council (HSRC) . Sixth South African national HIV, behavioural and health survey. HSRC Press, 2024.

Flash

Landovitz

Giler

, et al. Two years of truvada for pre-exposure prophylaxis utilization in the US. J Int AIDS Soc 2014; 17: 19730.

Grant

Lama

Anderson

, et al. Preexposure chemoprophylaxis for HIV prevention in men who have sex with men. N Engl J Med 2010; 363(27): 2587–2599.

World Health Organization . Guideline on when to start antiretroviral therapy and on pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV. WHO, 2015.

UNAIDS . Global AIDS update 2016: prevention gap report. UNAIDS, 2016.

Celum

Baeten

Hughes

, et al. PrEP for HIV prevention: evidence, global scale-up, and emerging options. Curr Opin HIV AIDS 2019; 14(1): 12–20.

Hartmann

McConnell

Bekker

, et al.

Motivated reasoning and HIV risk?

AIDS Behav 2018; 22(11): 3468–3479.

Gombe

Cakouros

Ncube

, et al. Key barriers and enablers associated with uptake and continuation of oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in the public sector in Zimbabwe: qualitative perspectives of general population clients at high risk for HIV. PLoS One 2020; 15(1): e0227632.

10.

Giovenco

Gill

Fynn

, et al. Experiences of oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use disclosure among South African adolescent girls and young women and its perceived impact on adherence. PLoS One 2021; 16(3): e0248307.

11.

Mutinta

Govender

. The socio-environmental determinants of students’ sexual risk behaviour and HIV prevention at the university of KwaZulu-Natal. J Hum Ecol 2012; 38(1): 17–29.

12.

Doyisa

Maharaj

Dunn

. Older men, younger women: blesser-blessee relationships among university students in Durban, South Africa. Cult Health Sex 2023; 25(11): 1530–1542.

13.

Malterud

Siersma

Guassora

. Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qual Health Res 2016; 26(13): 1753–1760.

14.

Braun

Clarke

. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006; 3(2): 77–101.

15.

Duby

Nkosi

Scheibe

, et al. Scared of going to the clinic. South Afr J HIV Med 2018; 19(1): 1–8.

16.

Corneli

Perry

Des Marais

, et al. Participant perceptions on the acceptability and feasibility of a telemedicine-based HIV PrEP and buprenorphine/naloxone program embedded within syringe services programs: a qualitative descriptive evaluation. Harm Reduct J 2022; 19(1): 132.