Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background

Biopsychosocial comorbidities are common in chronic illnesses like HIV, often resulting in complex clinical presentations. The Clinical Complexity Rating Scale for HIV (CCRS-HIV) was developed to identify these factors. This study examined whether complexity, as measured by the CCRS-HIV, could change over time.

Methods

Patients at The Albion Centre in Sydney were assessed at two time points (T₁ and T₂) using the CCRS-HIV. Changes in total and subscale scores were analysed, along with the odds of scoring in the complex range (40+ or 45+). The impact of age and time between assessments was also evaluated.

Results

Results showed a significant decrease in total complexity scores from T₁ to T₂, with improvements across four subscales—two psychological/behavioural, one social, and one biomedical. The proportion of complex cases declined, and participants were nearly twice as likely to be complex at T₁ compared to T₂. Longer intervals between assessments were linked to greater improvements, while age and sex had no effect.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that complexity in people living with HIV (PLHIV) is modifiable and support the CCRS-HIV as a valuable tool for screening and tracking changes in clinical complexity.

Keywords

Comorbidity HIV Biopsychosocial

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Plsek

Greenhalgh

. Complexity science: the challenge of complexity in health care. BMJ 2001; 323: 625–628.

Guaraldi

Malagoli

Calcagno

, et al. The increasing burden and complexity of multi-morbidity and polypharmacy in geriatric HIV patients: a cross sectional study of people aged 65 - 74 years and more than 75 years. BMC Geriatr 2018; 18: 99.

Chan

Furner

Smith

, et al. Non-AIDS complexity amongst patients living with HIV in Sydney: risk factors and health outcomes. AIDS Res Ther 2018; 15: 6.

Bulsara

Wainberg

Rogers

, et al. The role of comorbidity on retention in HIV care. AIDS Behav 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s10461-020-02992-1.

Cooke

. Expert patients: learning from HIV. BMJ Qual Saf 2011; 20 Suppl 1(Suppl 1): i67–i68.

Wade

Halligan

. The biopsychosocial model of illness: a model whose time has come. Clin Rehabil 2017; 31: 995–1004.

Kusnanto

Agustian

Hilmanto

. Biopsychosocial model of illnesses in primary care: a hermeneutic literature review. J Family Med Prim Care 2018; 7: 497–500.

Hardie

. Three aspects of health and healing: the biopsychosocial model in medicine. Washington University, Dept of Surgery.

Farre

Rapley

. The new old (and old new) medical model: four decades navigating the biomedical and psychosocial understandings of health and illness. Healthcare (Basel) 2017; 5: 20171118.

10.

Grant

Ashburner

Hong

, et al. Defining patient complexity from the primary care physician's perspective: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med 2011; 155: 797–804.

11.

Broeckaert

Challacombe

. Does multidisciplinary care improve health outcomes among people living with HIV and or HCV? A review of the evidence. Prevention in Focus 2015. Online First.

12.

Sherer

Stieglitz

Narra

, et al. HIV multidisciplinary teams work: support services improve access to and retention in HIV primary care. AIDS Care 2002; 14 Suppl 1(Suppl 1): S31–S44.

13.

Engel

. The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. Science 1977; 196: 129–136.

14.

Borrell-Carrio

Suchman

Epstein

. The biopsychosocial model 25 years later: principles, practice, and scientific inquiry. Ann Fam Med 2004; 2: 576–582.

15.

Bulsara

Begley

Smith

, et al. The development of an HIV-specific complexity rating scale. Int J STD AIDS 2019; 30: 1265–1274.

16.

Begley

Smith

Wand

, et al. “How well do we know our patients?”: further validation of a complexity rating scale for HIV. Int J STD AIDS 2024. Online First. https://doi.org/10.1177/09564624241279

17.

Centres for Disease Control and Prevention . Kaposi's sarcoma and pneumocystis pneumonia among homosexual men-New York City and California. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1981.

18.

Geng

Nash

Kambugu

, et al. Retention in care among HIV-infected patients in resource-limited settings: emerging insights and new directions. Curr HIV AIDS Rep 2010; 7: 234–244.

19.

Messeri

Abramson

Aidala

, et al. The impact of ancillary HIV services on engagement in medical care in New York City. AIDS Care 2002; 14 Suppl 1(Suppl 1): S15–S29.

20.

Chinyandura

Jiyane

Tsalong

, et al. Supporting retention in HIV care through a holistic, patient-centred approach: a qualitative evaluation. BMC Psychol 2022; 10: 17.

21.

Mutai

Sugiyama

Aoki

, et al. Key characteristics of patient complexity and patient complexity conceptual models/measurement tools: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open 2023; 13: e063982.

22.

Schubert

Sulis

De La Torre-Luque

, et al. Editorial: biopsychosocial complexity research. Front Psychiatry 2023; 14: 1157217.

HIV patient biopsychosocial complexity - Fixed or modifiable?

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References