The global burden of syphilis has remained persistently high with globally prevalent cases of syphilis, estimated to be 49.71 million in 2019. In India, where rates of syphilis screening remain sub-optimal, an accurate point-of-care (POC) test is convenient to carry out and guide immediate treatment. Here, we sought to evaluate the performance of an indigenous rapid POC test (Syphicheck -WB).
Methods
This study was carried out in the serology laboratory of our tertiary care center over 2 months. Five hundred serum samples were chosen randomly. Performance parameters of the POC test were calculated in comparison to the Treponema pallidum hemagglutination test, which was considered the reference standard.
Results
One hundred and six samples (21.2%) were reactive for syphilis by the reference method (TPHA). The sensitivity and specificity of the POC test, were 81.13% and 98.48% respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the reverse algorithm using POC test for screening, were 81.13% and 99.75% respectively, and of the traditional algorithm using VDRL were 77.36% and 100% respectively.
Conclusion
This POC test is a promising candidate as a rapid treponemal screening test. It is likely to improve screening for syphilis under both laboratory as well as field conditions.
TampaMSarbuIMateiC, et al.Brief history of syphilis. J Med Life2014; 7(1): 4–10.
2.
ChenTWanBWangM, et al.Evaluating the global, regional, and national impact of syphilis: results from the global burden of disease study 2019. Sci Rep2023; 13(1): 11386.
TrivediSTaylorMKambML, et al.Evaluating coverage of maternal syphilis screening and treatment within antenatal care to guide service improvements for prevention of congenital syphilis in countdown 2030 countries. J Glob Health2020; 10(1): 010504.
5.
KorenrompELRowleyJAlonsoM, et al.Global burden of maternal and congenital syphilis and associated adverse birth outcomes-estimates for 2016 and progress since 2012. PLoS One2019; 14(2): e0211720. [published correction appears in PLoS One. 2019;14(7):e0219613. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219613].
6.
TsuboiMEvansJDaviesEP, et al.Prevalence of syphilis among men who have sex with men: a global systematic review and meta-analysis from 2000-20. Lancet Global Health2021; 9(8): e1110–e1118.
7.
GuptaMVermaGKSharmaR, et al.The changing trend of syphilis: is it a sign of impending epidemic?Indian J Dermatol2023; 68(1): 15–24.
8.
AggarwalPBhattarSSahaniSK, et al.Sexually transmitted infections and HIV in self reporting men who have sex with men: a two-year study from India. J Infect Public Health2016; 9(5): 564–570.
9.
MendirattaVMeenaAKVermaD. Epidemiology and changing trends of sexually transmitted diseases over the past 17 years in a tertiary care center: a retrospective study. Indian J Sex Transm Dis2023; 44(2): 152–157.
10.
TongMLLinLRLiuLL, et al.Analysis of 3 algorithms for syphilis serodiagnosis and implications for clinical management. Clin Infect Dis2014; 58(8): 1116–1124.
11.
OrtizDAShuklaMRLoeffelholzMJ. The traditional or reverse algorithm for diagnosis of syphilis: pros and cons. Clin Infect Dis2020; 71(1): S43–S51.
12.
National AIDS Control Organization. National guidelines on prevention, management and control of reproductive tract infections and sexually transmitted infections. New Delhi: NACO, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, 2014.
13.
National AIDS Control Organization. The national strategy & operational guidelines towards elimination of congenital syphilis. New Delhi: NACO, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, 2015.
14.
PappJRParkIUFakileY, et al.CDC laboratory recommendations for syphilis testing, United States, 2024. MMWR Recomm Rep (Morb Mortal Wkly Rep)2024; 73(RR-1): 1–32.
15.
National Technical Guidelines on Sexually Transmitted Infections and Reproductive Tract Infections. National AIDS control organization. New Delhi: National AIDS Control Organization (NACO), 2024.
16.
PhamMDOngJJAndersonDA, et al.Point-of-care diagnostics for diagnosis of active syphilis infection: needs, challenges and the way forward. Int J Environ Res Publ Health2022; 19(13): 8172.
17.
WhyteKChittleATsangRSW. Syphilis point-of-care tests (POCTs): implementation considerations in Canada. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol2024; 9(4): 208–218.
18.
MohantyMPatleRANarlawarUW. Modified BG Prasad and modified Kuppuswami socio-economic status scales: revision and updates for january 2024. PMRR2024; 1(3): 166–167.
19.
LarsenSASteinerBMRudolphAH. Laboratory diagnosis and interpretation of tests for syphilis. Clin Microbiol Rev1995; 8(1): 1–21.
20.
MandellDPrinciplesB. Practices of infectious diseases. 9th ed.Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier, 2020.
21.
LuoYXieYXiaoY. Laboratory diagnostic tools for syphilis: current status and future prospects. Front Cell Infect Microbiol2021; 10: 574806.
22.
SatyaputraFHendrySBraddickM, et al.The laboratory diagnosis of syphilis. J Clin Microbiol2021; 59(10): e0010021. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00100-21, Epub 2021. PMID: 33980644; PMCID: PMC8451404.
23.
ParkIUTranAPereiraL, et al.Sensitivity and specificity of treponemal-specific tests for the diagnosis of syphilis. Clin Infect Dis2020; 71(Suppl 1): S13–S20.
24.
Point-of-care tests for sexually transmitted infections: target product profiles. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2023.
25.
BristowCCKlausnerJDTranA. Clinical test performance of a rapid point-of-care syphilis treponemal antibody test: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis2020; 71(Suppl 1): S52–S57.
26.
MishraSNaikBVenugopalB, et al.Syphilis screening among female sex workers in Bangalore, India: comparison of point-of-care testing and traditional serological approaches. Sex Transm Infect2010; 86(3): 193–198.
27.
GupteSDalyCAgarwalV, et al.Introduction of rapid tests for large-scale syphilis screening among female, male, and transgender sex workers in Mumbai, India. Sex Transm Dis2011; 38(6): 499–502. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44981341
28.
Angel-MüllerEGrillo-ArdilaCFAmaya-GuioJ, et al.Diagnostic accuracy of rapid point-of-care tests for detecting active syphilis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sex Transm Dis2021; 48(12): e202–e208.
29.
Nakku-JolobaEKiraggaAMbaziraJK, et al.Clinical evaluation of 2 point-of-care lateral flow tests for the diagnosis of syphilis. Sex Transm Dis2016; 43(10): 623–625.
30.
GliddonHDPeelingRWKambML, et al.A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies evaluating the performance and operational characteristics of dual point-of-care tests for HIV and syphilis. Sex Transm Infect2017; 93(S4): S3–S15.
