Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection has become a major contributor to the global burden of disease. Globally, the number of cases of HIV continues to increase. Electronic health (eHealth) interventions have emerged as promising tools to support disease self-management among people living with HIV. The purpose of this umbrella review is to systematically evaluate and summarize the evidence and results of published systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the effectiveness of eHealth interventions for HIV prevention, testing and management.
Methods
PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched for reviews. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using AMSTAR-2.
Results
A total of 22 systematic reviews were included. The methodological quality of the reviews was low or critically low. EHealth interventions range from Internet, computer, or mobile interventions to websites, programs, applications, email, video, games, telemedicine, texting, and social media, or a combination of them. The majority of the reviews showed evidence of effectiveness (including increased participation in HIV management behaviours, successfully changed HIV testing behaviours, and reduced risk behaviours). EHealth interventions were effective in the short term.
Conclusions
Ehealth interventions have the potential to improve HIV prevention, HIV testing and disease management. Due to the limitations of the low methodological quality of the currently available systematic reviews, more high-quality evidence is needed to develop clear and robust recommendations.
SchoutenJWitFWStolteIG, et al.Cross-sectional comparison of the prevalence of age-associated comorbidities and their risk factors between HIV-infected and uninfected individuals: the AGEhIV cohort study. Clin Infect Dis2014; 59: 1787–1797. DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciu701.
4.
OlsonGSMooreSWRichterJM, et al.Increased frequency of systemic pro-inflammatory Vδ1(+) γδ T cells in HIV elite controllers correlates with gut viral load. Sci Rep2018; 8: 16471. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-34576-4.
5.
RuizAPAjasinDORamasamyS, et al.A naturally occurring polymorphism in the HIV-1 tat basic domain inhibits uptake by bystander cells and leads to reduced neuroinflammation. Sci Rep2019; 9: 3308. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-39531-5.
6.
ClaysonDJWildDJQuartermanP, et al.A comparative review of health-related quality-of-life measures for use in HIV/AIDS clinical trials. Pharmacoeconomics2006; 24: 751–765. DOI: 10.2165/00019053-200624080-00003.
7.
GlobermanJMitraSGogolishviliD, et al.HIV/STI prevention interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Open Med2017; 12: 450–467. DOI: 10.1515/med-2017-0064.
8.
CostaABViscardiLHFeijoM, et al.HIV Voluntary Counseling and Testing (VCT-HIV) effectiveness for sexual risk-reduction among key populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. EClinicalMedicine2022; 52: 101612. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101612.
9.
TebejeTHKleinJ. Applications of e-health to support person-centered health care at the time of COVID-19 pandemic. Telemed J e Health: The Official Journal of the American Telemedicine Association2021; 27: 150–158. DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2020.0201.
10.
MaucoKLScottREMarsM. Validation of an e-health readiness assessment framework for developing countries. BMC Health Serv Res2020; 20: 575. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05448-3.
11.
Cruz-MartínezRRNoortPDAsbjørnsenRA, et al.Frameworks, models, and theories used in electronic health research and development to support self-management of cardiovascular diseases through remote monitoring technologies: protocol for a metaethnography review. JMIR Res Protoc2019; 8: e13334. DOI: 10.2196/13334.
12.
MuessigKENekkantiMBauermeisterJ, et al.A systematic review of recent smartphone, Internet and Web 2.0 interventions to address the HIV continuum of care. Current HIV/AIDS reports2015; 12: 173–190. DOI: 10.1007/s11904-014-0239-3.
13.
Melendez-TorresGJMeiksinRWitzelTC, et al.eHealth interventions to address HIV and other sexually transmitted infections, sexual risk behavior, substance use, and mental ill-health in men who have sex with men: systematic review and meta-analysis. JMIR public health and surveillance2022; 8: e27061. DOI: 10.2196/27061.
14.
PurnomoJCooteKMaoL, et al.Using eHealth to engage and retain priority populations in the HIV treatment and care cascade in the Asia-Pacific region: a systematic review of literature. BMC Infect Dis2018; 18: 82. DOI: 10.1186/s12879-018-2972-5.
15.
SundströmCBlankersMKhadjesariZ. Computer-based interventions for problematic alcohol use: a review of systematic reviews. Int J Behav Med2017; 24: 646–658. DOI: 10.1007/s12529-016-9601-8.
16.
OosterveenETzelepisFAshtonL, et al.A systematic review of eHealth behavioral interventions targeting smoking, nutrition, alcohol, physical activity and/or obesity for young adults. Prev Med2017; 99: 197–206. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.01.009.
17.
MüllerAMAlleySSchoeppeS, et al.The effectiveness of e-& mHealth interventions to promote physical activity and healthy diets in developing countries: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Activ2016; 13: 109. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-016-0434-2.
18.
CampbellBRIngersollKSFlickingerTE, et al.Bridging the digital health divide: toward equitable global access to mobile health interventions for people living with HIV. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther2019; 17: 141–144. DOI: 10.1080/14787210.2019.1578649.
19.
BaileyJMannSWayalS, et al.Digital media interventions for sexual health promotion-opportunities and challenges: a great way to reach people, particularly those at increased risk of sexual ill health. BMJ2015; 350: h1099. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h1099.
20.
DaherJVijhRLinthwaiteB, et al.Do digital innovations for HIV and sexually transmitted infections work? Results from a systematic review (1996-2017). BMJ Open2017; 7: e017604. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017604.
21.
ZhangLNiZLiuY, et al.The effectiveness of e-health on reducing stigma, improving social support and quality of life among people living with HIV: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Nurs Stud2023; 148: 104606. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2023.104606.
22.
IbenemeSCNdukwuSCMyezwaH, et al.Effectiveness of mobile text reminder in improving adherence to medication, physical exercise, and quality of life in patients living with HIV: a systematic review. BMC Infect Dis2021; 21: 859. DOI: 10.1186/s12879-021-06563-0.
23.
BezabihAMGerlingKAbebeW, et al.Behavioral theories and motivational features underlying eHealth interventions for adolescent antiretroviral adherence: systematic review. JMIR mHealth and uHealth2021; 9: e25129. DOI: 10.2196/25129.
24.
MeiksinRMelendez-TorresGJFalconerJ, et al.eHealth interventions to address sexual health, substance use, and mental health among men who have sex with men: systematic review and synthesis of process evaluations. J Med Internet Res2021; 23: e22477. DOI: 10.2196/22477.
25.
ChoHIribarrenSSchnallR. Technology-mediated interventions and quality of life for persons living with HIV/AIDS. A systematic review. Appl Clin Inf2017; 8: 348–368. DOI: 10.4338/aci-2016-10-r-0175.
26.
ScherrerRTschumiNLejoneTI, et al.eHealth supported multi-months dispensing of antiretroviral therapy: a mixed-methods preference assessment in rural Lesotho. Pilot and Feasibility Studies2022; 8: 61. DOI: 10.1186/s40814-022-01019-x.
27.
BraddockWRTOcasioMAComuladaWS, et al.Increasing participation in a TelePrEP program for sexual and gender minority adolescents and young adults in Louisiana: protocol for an SMS text messaging-based chatbot. JMIR research protocols2023; 12: e42983. DOI: 10.2196/42983.
28.
LeeJJAguirre HerreraJCardonaJ, et al.Culturally tailored social media content to reach latinx immigrant sexual minority men for HIV prevention: web-based feasibility study. JMIR formative research2022; 6: e36446. DOI: 10.2196/36446.
29.
LeeJJAguirreJMunguiaL, et al.Engagement of Latino immigrant men who have sex with men for HIV prevention through eHealth: preferences across social media platforms. Ethn Health2022; 27: 1684–1697. DOI: 10.1080/13557858.2021.1943322.
30.
SinnoJMacapagalKMustanskiB. Social Media and Online Dating Safety Practices by Adolescent Sexual and Gender Diverse Men: Mixed-Methods Findings From the SMART Study. J Adolesc Health2024; 74: 113–122. DOI:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2023.07.030
31.
ConserveDFJenningsLAguiarC, et al.Systematic review of mobile health behavioural interventions to improve uptake of HIV testing for vulnerable and key populations. J Telemed Telecare2017; 23: 347–359. DOI: 10.1177/1357633x16639186
32.
XinMViswanathKLiAY-C, et al.The effectiveness of electronic health interventions for promoting HIV-preventive behaviors among men who have sex with men: meta-analysis based on an integrative framework of design and implementation features. J Med Internet Res2020; 22: e15977. DOI: 10.2196/15977.
33.
NguyenLHTranBXRochaLEC, et al.A systematic review of eHealth interventions addressing HIV/STI prevention among men who have sex with men. AIDS Behav2019; 23: 2253–2272. DOI: 10.1007/s10461-019-02626-1.
34.
ManbyLAickenCDelgrangeM, et al.Effectiveness of eHealth interventions for HIV prevention and management in sub-saharan Africa: systematic review and meta-analyses. AIDS Behav2022; 26: 457–469. DOI: 10.1007/s10461-021-03402-w.
35.
NwaozuruUObiezu-UmehCShatoT, et al.Mobile health interventions for HIV/STI prevention among youth in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs): a systematic review of studies reporting implementation outcomes. Implementation science communications2021; 2: 126. DOI: 10.1186/s43058-021-00230-w.
36.
van VelthovenMHTudor CarLCarJ, et al.Telephone consultation for improving health of people living with or at risk of HIV: a systematic review. PLoS One2012; 7: e36105. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036105.
37.
GatesMGatesAPieperD, et al.Reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions: development of the PRIOR statement. BMJ2022; 378: e0708490. DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2022-070849.
38.
SheaBJReevesBCWellsG, et al.AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ2017; 358: j4008. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.j4008.
39.
PuljakLBalaMMMathesT, et al.AMSTAR 2 is only partially applicable to systematic reviews of non-intervention studies: a meta-research study. J Clin Epidemiol2023; 163: 11–20. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.08.021.
40.
PieperDPuljakLGonzález-LorenzoM, et al.Minor differences were found between AMSTAR 2 and ROBIS in the assessment of systematic reviews including both randomized and nonrandomized studies. J Clin Epidemiol2019; 108: 26–33. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.12.004.
41.
MatthiasKRisslingOPieperD, et al.The methodological quality of systematic reviews on the treatment of adult major depression needs improvement according to AMSTAR 2: a cross-sectional study. Heliyon2020; 6: e04776. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04776.
42.
LorenzRCMatthiasKPieperD, et al.A psychometric study found AMSTAR 2 to be a valid and moderately reliable appraisal tool. J Clin Epidemiol2019; 114: 133–140. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.05.028.
43.
PageMJMcKenzieJEBossuytPM, et al.The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ2021; 372(03/31): n71. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
44.
NobleMJonesAMBowlesK, et al.HIV testing among internet-using MSM in the United States: systematic review. AIDS Behav2017; 21: 561–575. DOI: 10.1007/s10461-016-1506-7.
45.
TuftsKAJohnsonKFShepherdJG, et al.Novel interventions for HIV self-management in African American women: a systematic review of mHealth interventions. J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care : J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care2015; 26: 139–150. DOI: 10.1016/j.jana.2014.08.002.
46.
SchnallRTraversJRojasM, et al.eHealth interventions for HIV prevention in high-risk men who have sex with men: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res2014; 16: e134. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.3393.
47.
NguyenLHTranBXRochaLEC, et al.A systematic review of eHealth interventions addressing HIV/STI prevention among men who have sex with men. AIDS Behav2019; 23: 2253–2272. DOI: 10.1007/s10461-019-02626-1.
48.
NelsonKMPerryNSHorvathKJ, et al.A systematic review of mHealth interventions for HIV prevention and treatment among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men. Transl Behav Med2020; 10: 1211–1220. DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibaa007.
49.
HorvathKJWalkerTMirelesL, et al.A systematic review of technology-assisted HIV testing interventions. Curr HIV AIDS Rep2020; 17: 269–280. DOI: 10.1007/s11904-020-00506-1.
50.
OsingadaCPMcMorrisBPiehlerTF, et al.Acceptability, feasibility, and efficacy of telehealth interventions for HIV testing and treatment in adult populations. Telemed J e Health2023; 29: 1001–1013. DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2022.0424.
51.
ZouHFanS. Characteristics of men who have sex with men who use smartphone geosocial networking applications and Implications for HIV interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Sex Behav2017; 46: 885–894. DOI: 10.1007/s10508-016-0709-3.
52.
McGuireMde WaalAKarellisA, et al.HIV self-testing with digital supports as the new paradigm: a systematic review of global evidence (2010-2021). EClinicalMedicine2021; 39: 101059. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101059.
53.
CatalaniCPhilbrickWFraserH, et al.mHealth for HIV treatment & prevention: a systematic review of the literature. Open AIDS J2013; 7: 17–41. DOI: 10.2174/1874613620130812003.
54.
CooperVClatworthyJWhethamJ, et al.mHealth interventions to support self-management in HIV: a systematic review. Open AIDS J2017; 11: 119–132. DOI: 10.2174/1874613601711010119.
55.
QueirozAMendesIACde GodoyS, et al.mHealth strategies related to HIV postexposure Prophylaxis knowledge and access: systematic literature review, technology prospecting of patent databases, and systematic search on app stores. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth2021; 9: e23912. DOI: 10.2196/23912.
56.
BerendesSGubijevAMcCarthyOL, et al.Sexual health interventions delivered to participants by mobile technology: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Sex Transm Infect2021; 97: 190–200. DOI: 10.1136/sextrans-2020-054853.
57.
van-VelthovenMHTudor CarLGentryS, et al.Telephone delivered interventions for preventing HIV infection in HIV-negative persons. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2013; 31(5): CD009190. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009190.pub2.
58.
VeroneseVRyanKEHughesC, et al.Using digital communication technology to increase HIV testing among men who have sex with men and transgender women: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res2020; 22: e14230. DOI: 10.2196/14230.
59.
YehPTKennedyCEMinamitaniA, et al.Web-based service provision of HIV, viral hepatitis, and sexually transmitted infection prevention, testing, linkage, and treatment for key populations: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res2022; 24: e40150. DOI: 10.2196/40150.
60.
RosserBROakesJMKonstanJ, et al.Reducing HIV risk behavior of men who have sex with men through persuasive computing: results of the men’s INTernet study-II. AIDS2010; 24: 2099–2107. DOI: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32833c4ac7.
61.
MilamJMorrisSJainS, et al.Randomized controlled trial of an internet application to reduce HIV transmission behavior among HIV infected men who have sex with men. AIDS Behav2016; 20: 1173–1181. DOI: 10.1007/s10461-015-1215-7.
62.
BowenAMWilliamsMLDanielCM, et al.Internet based HIV prevention research targeting rural MSM: feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy. J Behav Med2008; 31: 463–477. DOI: 10.1007/s10865-008-9171-6.
63.
CzarnyHNBroaddusMR. Acceptability of HIV prevention information delivered through established geosocial networking mobile applications to men who have sex with men. AIDS Behav2017; 21: 3122–3128. DOI: 10.1007/s10461-017-1743-4.
64.
MuessigKEPikeECFowlerB, et al.Putting prevention in their pockets: developing mobile phone-based HIV interventions for black men who have sex with men. AIDS Patient Care STDS2013; 27: 211–222. DOI: 10.1089/apc.2012.0404.
65.
KhosropourCMLakeJGSullivanPS. Are MSM willing to SMS for HIV prevention?J Health Commun2014; 19: 57–66. DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2013.798373.
66.
HollowayIWRiceEGibbsJ, et al.Acceptability of smartphone application-based HIV prevention among young men who have sex with men. AIDS Behav2014; 18: 285–296. DOI: 10.1007/s10461-013-0671-1.
67.
BeleigoliAMAndradeAQCançadoAG, et al.Web-based digital health interventions for weight loss and lifestyle habit changes in overweight and obese adults: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res2019; 21: e298. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.9609.
68.
HowarthAQuesadaJSilvaJ, et al.The impact of digital health interventions on health-related outcomes in the workplace: a systematic review. Digit Health2018; 4: 2055207618770861. DOI: 10.1177/2055207618770861.
69.
GreenwoodDAGeePMFatkinKJ, et al.A systematic review of reviews evaluating technology-enabled diabetes self-management education and support. J Diabetes Sci Technol2017; 11: 1015–1027. DOI: 10.1177/1932296817713506.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
