Abstract
Background
Point of care diagnostic tests (POCTs) for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) have the potential to improve STI care worldwide. However, barriers to adoption, cost considerations and practitioner priorities may not be uniform globally and over time. We conducted two surveys, 7 years apart, among members of the International Union Against Sexually Transmitted Infections (IUSTI), and compare results here.
Methods
Surveys were given to members attending two IUSTI conferences in 2012 (Australia) and 2019 (Estonia). Descriptive analyses were performed and chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests conducted.
Results
Amongst N = 190 participants in 2012 and N = 166 in 2019, 61% in 2012 and 77% in 2019 were from high-income countries (HICs). In 2012, 84% of respondents from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and 70% from HICs thought cost of test was more important than amount of reimbursement. Trends were similar in 2019. In 2012, unreliability was considered the most important barrier to POCT use by all groups, followed by being laboratory-driven and complexity. In 2019, time frame was considered most important, followed by unreliability and being laboratory-driven. In 2012, the top priority for POCT development among LMIC respondents was early HIV seroconversion (31%), versus chlamydia (57%) for HICs. In 2019, chlamydia remained top priority for HICs (40%), followed by early HIV seroconversion (19%) and gonorrhea (17%); top priorities for LMICs were chlamydia (26%), HPV (24%), and early HIV seroconversion (21%).
Conclusions
Practitioner priorities for STI POCTs may be shifting. Cost may be critical to adoption in all settings. Larger studies are needed to verify findings.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
