Sexually transmitted infections pose a major public health challenge in the United States and this burden is especially acute in subpopulations like young men who have sex with men (YMSM) and young transgender women (YTW). Yet, the direct behavioral antecedents of these infections are not well understood making it difficult to identify the cause of recent increases in incidence. This study examines how variations in partnership rates and the number of condomless sex acts are associated with STI infections among YMSM-YTW.
Method
This study leveraged 3 years of data from a large longitudinal cohort of YMSM-YTW. A series of generalized linear mixed models examined the association between the number of condomless anal sex acts, number of one-time partners, number of casual partners, and number of main partners and chlamydia, gonorrhea, or any STI.
Results
Results indicated the number of casual partners was associated with gonorrhea [aOR = 1.17 (95% CI: 1.08, 1.26)], chlamydia [aOR = 1.12 (95% CI: 1.05, 1.20)], and any STI [aOR = 1.14 (95% CI: 1.08, 1.21)] while the number of one-time partners was only associated with gonorrhea [aOR = 1.13 (95% CI: 1.02, 1.26)]. The number of condomless anal sex acts was not associated with any outcome.
Conclusion
These findings suggest the number of casual partners is a consistent predictor of STI infection among YMSM-YTW. This may reflect the quick saturation of risk within partnerships making the number of partners, rather than the number of acts, the more relevant factor for STI risk.
Scott-SheldonLAJChanPA. Increasing sexually transmitted infections in the U.S.: a call for action for research, clinical, and public health practice. Arch Sex Behav2020; 49: 13–17.
2.
DewartCMBernsteinKTDeGrooteNP, et al.Prevalence of rectal chlamydial and gonococcal infections: a systematic review. Sex Transm Dis2018; 45: 287–293.
3.
Van GerwenOTTamhaneAWestfallAO, et al.Prevalence of and factors associated with genital and extragenital chlamydia and gonorrhea among transgender women in HIV care in the United States, 2005 to 2016. Sex Transm Dis2021; 48: 410–416.
4.
ChowEPFGrulichAEFairleyCK. Epidemiology and prevention of sexually transmitted infections in men who have sex with men at risk of HIV. Lancet HIV2019; 6: e396–e405.
5.
DeVostMABeymerMRWeissRE, et al.App-based sexual partner seeking and sexually transmitted infection outcomes: a cross-sectional study of HIV-negative men who have sex with men attending a sexually transmitted infection clinic in Los Angeles, California. Sex Transm Dis2018; 45: 394–399.
6.
RamchandaniMSGoldenMR. Confronting rising STIs in the Era of PrEP and treatment as prevention. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep2019; 16: 244–256.
7.
GarnettGPWhitePJWardH. Fewer partners or more condoms? Modelling the effectiveness of STI prevention interventions. Sex Transm Infect2008; 84(Suppl 2): 4–11.
8.
CallanderDGuyRFairleyCK, et al.Gonorrhoea gone wild: rising incidence of gonorrhoea and associated risk factors among gay and bisexual men attending Australian sexual health clinics. Sex Health2019; 16: 457–463.
9.
ChowEPFTomnayJFehlerG, et al.Substantial increases in chlamydia and gonorrhea positivity unexplained by changes in individual-level sexual behaviors among men who have sex with men in an Australian sexual health service from 2007 to 2013. Sex Transm Dis2015; 42: 81–87.
10.
GrovCCainDRendinaHJ, et al.Characteristics associated with urethral and rectal gonorrhea and chlamydia diagnoses in a US National sample of gay and bisexual men: results from the one thousand strong panel. Sex Transm Dis2016; 43: 165–171.
11.
GolubSAPeñaSFikslinRA, et al.Partners, not condom use, drive STI rates among PrEP users in community health center. Top Antivir Med2018; 26: 468.
12.
HassanABlumenthalJDubeM, et al.Effect of rectal hygiene on sexually transmitted infections among HIV-negative men who have sex with men (MSM). Open Forum Infectious Diseases2017; 4: S103.
13.
GoddardSLPoyntenIMPetoumenousK, et al.Prevalence, incidence and predictors of anal Chlamydia trachomatis, anal Neisseria gonorrhoeae and syphilis among older gay and bisexual men in the longitudinal study for the prevention of anal cancer (SPANC). Sex Transm Infect2019; 95: 477–483.
14.
JinFPrestageGPMaoL, et al.Incidence and risk factors for urethral and anal gonorrhoea and chlamydia in a cohort of HIV-negative homosexual men: the health in men study. Sex Transm Infect2007; 83: 113–119.
15.
FalasinnuTGilbertMHottesTS, et al.Predictors identifying those at increased risk for STDs: a theory-guided review of empirical literature and clinical guidelines. Int J Std Aids2015; 26: 839–851.
16.
SullivanPSSalazarLBuchbinderS, et al.Estimating the proportion of HIV transmissions from main sex partners among men who have sex with men in five US cities. Aids2009; 23: 1153–1162.
17.
BoyerCBGreenbergLKorelitzJ, et al.Sexual partner characteristics, relationship type, and HIV risk among a community venue-based sample of urban adolescent and young adult men who have sex with men. Youth Soc2019; 51: 219–246.
18.
JanulisPFeinsteinBAPhillipsGII, et al.Sexual partner typologies and the association between drug use and sexual risk behavior among young men who have sex with men. Arch Sex Behav2018; 47: 259–271.
19.
MorganEDyarCNewcombME, et al.PrEP use and sexually transmitted infections are not associated longitudinally in a cohort study of young men who have sex with men and transgender women in Chicago. Aids and behavior. 2020; 24(5): 1334–1341. Epub ahead of print 2019. DOI: 10.1007/s10461-019-02664-9
BransonBMOwenSMWesolowskiLG, et al.Laboratory testing for the diagnosis of HIV infection: updated recommendations. Atlanta, GA: CDC, 2014. Epub ahead of print 2014. DOI: 10.15620/cdc.23447
22.
EndersCKMistlerSAKellerBT. Multilevel multiple imputation: a review and evaluation of joint modeling and chained equations imputation. Psychol Methods2016; 21: 222–240.
23.
van BuurenSGroothuis-OudshoornK. mice: multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. Journal of Statistical Software, Articles2011; 45: 1–67.
24.
RubinDB. Multiple imputation for survey nonresponse. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2004.
25.
PinkertonSDChessonHWCrosbyRA, et al.Linearity and nonlinearity in HIV/STI transmission: implications for the evaluation of sexual risk reduction interventions. Eval Rev2011; 35: 550–565.
26.
JennessSMWeissKMGoodreauSM, et al.Incidence of gonorrhea and chlamydia following human immunodeficiency virus preexposure prophylaxis among men who have sex with men: a modeling study. Clin Infect Dis2017; 65: 712–718.
27.
FalasinnuTGustafsonPHottesTS, et al.A critical appraisal of risk models for predicting sexually transmitted infections. Sex Transm Dis2014; 41: 321–330.
28.
KingCHughesGFuregatoM, et al.Predicting STI diagnoses amongst MSM and young people attending sexual health clinics in England: triage algorithm development and validation using routine clinical data. EClinicalMedicine2018; 4–5: 43–51.
29.
LutzAR. Screening for asymptomatic extragenital gonorrhea and chlamydia in men who have sex with men: significance, recommendations, and options for overcoming barriers to testing. LGBT Health2015; 2: 27–34.
30.
RosenbergESRothenbergRBKleinbaumDG, et al.The implications of respondent concurrency on sex partner risk in a national, web-based study of men who have sex with men in the United States. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr2013; 63: 514–521.
31.
NguyenLHTranBXRochaLEC, et al.A systematic review of ehealth interventions addressing HIV/STI prevention among men who have sex with men. Aids Behav2019; 23: 2253–2272.
32.
St LawrenceJSMontañoDEKasprzykD, et al.STD screening, testing, case reporting, and clinical and partner notification practices: a national survey of US physicians. Am J Public Health2002; 92: 1784–1788.
33.
ScottHMKlausnerJD. Sexually transmitted infections and pre-exposure prophylaxis: challenges and opportunities among men who have sex with men in the US. AIDS Res Ther2016; 13: 5.
