Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objective

Men with HIV are less likely than women to know their status, be on antiretroviral therapy, and be virally suppressed. This review examined men’s community-based HIV testing services (CB-HTS) outcomes.

Design

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods

We searched seven databases and conference abstracts through July 2018. We estimated pooled proportions and/or risk ratios (for meta-analyses) for each outcome using random effects models.

Results

188 studies met inclusion criteria. Common testing models included targeted outreach (e.g. mobile testing), home-based testing, and testing at stand-alone community sites. Across 25 studies reporting uptake, 81% (CI: 75–86%) of men offered testing accepted it. Uptake was higher among men reached through CB-HTS than facility-based HTS (RR = 1.39; CI: 1.13–1.71). Over 69% (CI: 64–71%) of those tested through CB-HTS were men, across 184 studies. Across studies reporting new HIV-positivity among men (n = 18), 96% were newly diagnosed (CI: 77–100%). Across studies reporting linkage to HIV care (n = 8), 70% (CI: 36–103%) of men were linked to care. Across 57 studies reporting sex-disaggregated data for CB-HTS conducted among key populations, men’s uptake was high (80%; CI: 70–88%) and nearly all were newly diagnosed and linked to care (95%; CI: 94–100%; and 94%; CI: 88–100%, respectively).

Conclusion

CB-HTS is an important strategy for reaching undiagnosed men with HIV from the general population and key population groups, particularly using targeted outreach models. When compared to facility-based HIV testing services, men tested through CB-HTS are more likely to uptake testing, and nearly all men who tested positive through CB-HTS were newly diagnosed. Linkage to care may be a challenge following CB-HTS, and greater efforts and research are needed to effectively implement testing strategies that facilitate rapid ART initiation and linkage to prevention services.

Keywords

Community testing HIV care continuum HIV prevention gender men who have sex with men

Introduction

Globally, an estimated 37.7 million people are living with HIV, and approximately 680,000 AIDS-related deaths occurred in 2021.¹ The Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) has introduced bold fast-track targets to reduce HIV incidence by ensuring that 95% of all people with HIV know their status, that 95% of people with a known HIV-positive status are receiving antiretroviral treatment (ART), and that 95% of people on ART achieve viral suppression.² While these targets have galvanized scale-up of HIV testing and treatment, gaps remain, particularly among men. As of 2019, only 82% of HIV-positive men globally knew their status (vs 88% of women), 68% of HIV-positive men were on treatment (vs 79% of women), and 62% of HIV-positive men had achieved viral suppression (vs 72% of women).¹ While gendered disparities in 95–95–95 outcomes persist across all regions, they are greatest in sub-Saharan Africa.¹

Men face multiple barriers to facility-based HIV testing services (FB-HTS). In settings of generalized epidemics, barriers include individual factors (knowledge, fear of HIV positivity or disclosure),^3–5 social factors (HIV-related stigma),^4,6 and factors related to testing environments (long waits; perceptions that facility nurses are rude or unfriendly toward men seeking testing; and confidentiality concerns).^4,5,7–10 Further, whereas FB-HTS is routinely available for women through existing clinical services (e.g. antenatal care),^11,12 efforts to integrate HIV testing into clinical services sought by men are underexamined, despite some preliminary evidence that such models may contribute to higher HIV test uptake than standalone HIV testing services.^13–18 Moreover, masculine norms which value strength, self-reliance and maintenance of traditional social roles may decrease access to FB-HTS.^{4,7–10,19,20}

For men in key populations (e.g. men who have sex with men (MSM), male sex workers, and men who inject drugs), these barriers may be compounded by stigma and discrimination that restrict the availability, accessibility, and uptake of HIV testing and other health services.^21–25 Social and structural factors (such as laws criminalizing same-sex relations) may restrict HIV testing accessibility for key populations,²⁶ while also impacting the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of healthcare providers responsible for assessing HIV risk, offering testing, communicating results, and initiating treatment.^21,27,28 Consequently, members of key populations may have heightened concerns regarding the confidentiality of their test results and sexual identity,^29,30 particularly in settings with punitive laws related to HIV test results and/or sexual identity.³¹

The World Health Organization has recommended community-based HIV testing (CB-HTS) models to address such barriers and facilitate early HIV detection.³² The high uptake (>85%) among men who were offered home-based testing in six African countries suggests that, when offered community-based testing, men accept it³³; a recent scoping review across sub-Saharan Africa reported similar findings.³⁴ In two prior systematic reviews of testing in sub-Saharan Africa before 2015 (one which explicitly examined CB-HTS, the other which examined several HIV testing strategies, including CB-HTS, on men’s uptake), outreach testing models were the most likely community-based model to test men.^35,36 A global systematic review of literature up to early 2013 also reported that workplace models tested high proportions of men (67% of those tested were men). In prior reviews, the majority of individuals tested within other CB-HTS models, like home-based testing, were women.^35–37

While prior reviews report demographics of individuals accessing CB-HTS, no reviews describe global outcomes along the full HIV care cascade for all men (from both general and key populations), examine which CB-HTS models test high proportions of men, or examine whether outcomes differ for men in key population groups and general populations. Therefore, this global systematic review aims to describe how CB-HTS strategies impact men’s testing uptake and engagement within the HIV care cascade.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review in accordance with PRISMA guidelines.³⁸ Observational and experimental studies were included if they were published before 1 July 2018, included CB-HTS interventions (detailed definition in Table 1), provided data disaggregated by sex, and reported on any of the following outcomes: (1) HIV testing uptake, (2) proportion of those tested who are male, (3) proportion newly diagnosed with HIV, (4) proportion linked to care, (5) proportion who initiate ART, (6) report of retention in care or (7) report of viral suppression among those on treatment (detailed definitions in Supplemental Digital Content 1). No exclusion was placed on geographic region, language or population engaged (i.e. we did not restrict our search to any particular population or demographic characteristics). Surveillance studies and surveys were excluded as they did not report on CB-HTS as an intervention. HIV self-testing studies were excluded from the review because these are defined as separate from CB-HTS by the WHO.

Table 1.

Testing approach definitions.

Testing approach	Description
Home-based testing	Testing offered at the household level, often in door-to-door campaigns
Index/partner notification	Community-level testing of the sexual partners, household members and children of recently identified HIV-positive individuals
Stand-alone community sites	Testing in fixed settings at community-level where HIV testing is exclusively offered. This may include voluntary counseling and testing centers, as well as the offices of community-based organizations
Outreach	Testing is done in non-clinical settings often in high-prevalence areas where populations are likely to congregate. This includes commercial settings (e.g. sex on premises venues), social service venues (e.g. needle exchange programmes), large events (e.g. gay pride parades), other venues (e.g. pharmacies) and street-based testing in mobile vans
Index testing for TB	This testing approach identifies individuals with tuberculosis at clinics or hospitals and offers home-based HIV testing to their household contacts
Workplace	Testing is offered in the workplace
School	Testing is offered in the school
Combination	Community-based testing may also use a hybrid of these approaches using one or more of the above models. For example, door-to-door home-based testing complemented with outreach campaigns

Information sources and search strategy

Seven databases (see table, Supplemental Digital Content 2) were searched at two time points (1) February–March 2015 (for studies published before 31 December 2014); and (2) August–November 2018 (for studies published between 1 January 2015 and 1 July 2018). All studies published before 1 July 2018 were screened. Given our comprehensive search across seven databases, we did not manually search the reference lists of publications. However, to account for publication lags, we searched electronic conference abstracts from three HIV conferences between 2015–2018. All records were collated in Zotero and duplicates were removed prior to screening.

Search terms were adapted from a 2013 review by Suthar et al.³⁷ (see table, Supplemental Digital Content 2). To search HIV-related conference abstracts, only terms “HIV” and “test” were used as keywords.

Data screening and extraction

All abstracts were independently screened by two authors (AG and PS) for inclusion. Disagreements were resolved through discussion. Data were independently extracted by PS, AG, SB, SS, LN and KO. Extractors followed a strict protocol and held weekly meetings to ensure robust extraction.

In total, 60,477 unique records were screened; full text from 1729 studies was assessed for eligibility (Figure 1). Ultimately, 457 studies met inclusion criteria. Full text was independently assessed for eligibility by two reviewers, which yielded 188 studies for inclusion (see table, Supplemental Digital Content 3).^39–195 Most studies were cross-sectional (n = 115, 61.17%), followed by cohort (n = 31, 16.49%), quasi-experimental (n = 28, 14.89%) and randomized trials (n = 14, 7.45%). Two-thirds of included studies were published after 2013, and half of included studies were published after 2015 (see figure, Supplemental Digital Content 4).

Figure 1.

Consort diagram.

Study quality was assessed using two tools (see tables, Supplemental Digital Content 5a and 5b). For randomized studies reporting male outcomes with a comparator arm, we used the Cochrane Collaboration’s ‘‘risk of bias’’ tool,¹⁹⁶ which assesses potential for bias arising from randomization, missingness, outcome measurement, and selective reporting. This scale ranges from 0–6; higher scores indicate lower risk of bias. Eight experimental studies had sufficient data for evaluation; studies received a mean score of 3.5, indicating moderate risk of bias.

For non-randomized quasi-experimental studies reporting male outcomes, we used the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale.¹⁹⁷ This scale ranges from 0–8 and assesses study quality based on selection bias, potential for confounding, and measurement bias. Higher scores indicate lower risk of bias. 18 quasi-experimental studies had sufficient data for Newcastle-Ottawa Scale evaluation; studies received a mean score of 4.0, indicating average study quality.

Statistical analysis

Random effects meta-analysis of single proportions was used to summarize results for each main outcome across all studies reporting the outcome. Proportions were stabilized using Freeman-Tukey transformation.¹⁹⁸ We conducted a meta-analysis of studies that compared outcomes for participants who received CB-HTS to outcomes for participants who received FB-HTS, using random effects models with the metan package in Stata v18. We report pooled relative risks (RRs) and present forest plots where appropriate. The I² statistic for the meta-analytic output was used to measure heterogeneity with values of 25%, 50% and 75% indicating low, moderate, high heterogeneity, respectively.¹⁹⁹ Analyses were conducted with Stata v17 and SAS software.^200,201

Results

Of 188 studies that evaluated at least one CB-HTS outcome for men, over two-thirds focused on men from the general population (GP) (n = 131, 69.68%). Of the 57 remaining studies focusing on men from key populations (KP), over half were on MSM (n = 32, 56.14%). Other studies that reported on male outcomes within KP focused on people who inject drugs (PWID) (n = 7, 12.28%) or mixed populations (n = 18, 31.57%). (See graphs, Supplemental Digital Content 6a–6e and 7a–7e, for forest plots of outcomes by population).

The most common CB-HTS models identified in this review were outreach (n = 92, 48.94%), home-based (door-to-door) (n = 50, 26.60%), stand-alone community sites (n = 19, 10.11%), combination models (n = 14, 7.44%), and school-based models (n = 6, 3.19%). All other models (i.e. index testing (n = 3), TB index testing (n = 1), workplace models (n = 3)) had few studies reporting on male outcomes. Nearly 85% of GP studies used home-based (n = 50, 38.17%) or outreach models (n = 61, 46.56%), and over 80% of KP studies used outreach models (n = 31, 54.39%) or stand-alone community sites (n = 14, 24.56%) (see graphs, Supplemental Digital Content 8a–8j, for forest plots of outcomes by model).

Half of all included studies occurred in sub-Saharan Africa (n = 104, 55.32%) (see map, Supplemental Digital Content 9). The remainder occurred in the Americas (n = 43, 22.87%), Europe (n = 24, 12.77%), Western Pacific (n = 9, 4.79%) or Southeast Asia (n = 8, 4.26%). Most GP studies took place in Africa (n = 97, 74.05%) or the Americas (n = 20, 15.27%). KP studies were more geographically diverse: 42% occurred in the Americas (n = 24), 28% in Europe (n = 16), 12% in the Western Pacific Region (n = 7), 11% in Africa (n = 6) and 7% in Southeast Asia (n = 4). (see graphs, Supplemental Digital Content 10a–10i, for outcomes by region).

Uptake of HIV testing

Across 25 studies, 19 of which came from Africa, 400,632 men were offered testing, and 306,945 men received HIV testing (Figure 2). Pooled male testing uptake was 81% (95% CI: 75–86%); nearly half of all men (48%) were first-time testers. When restricted to five rigorous (i.e. experimental/quasi-experimental) studies, uptake was significantly higher among men offered CB-HTS than FB-HTS (RR: 1.39; 95% CI: 1.13–1.71) (Figure 3). High heterogeneity was observed across the five estimates (I² = 99.0%).

Figure 2.

Uptake and new HIV diagnoses of men reached through CB-HTS.

Figure 3.

Comparing uptake of HIV testing for men reached through CB HTS and facility-based HTS.

Home-based (n = 14) and outreach testing (n = 7) models had high male uptake, with pooled testing uptake of 84% (95% CI: 76–91%) and 80% (95% CI: 71–88%), respectively. The sample size for specific outreach approaches (e.g. sex-on-premises venues, pharmacies, religious venues) is too small to report meaningful variation in uptake by outreach approach. Uptake was high among studies in Africa (n = 19): 82% (95% CI: 76–88%); sample sizes for other regions are too small to report meaningful regional variation in uptake.

Proportion of males among those tested

Across 184 reporting studies that offered CB-HTS, over two-thirds (69%) of those tested were men (95% CI: 64–71%). Just over half (58%) of those tested in Africa were men (95% CI: 54–61%), whereas in Europe and the Western Pacific, an overwhelming majority of those tested were men: 87% (95% CI: 78–94%) and 93% (95% CI: 63–100%), respectively. When restricted to 11 rigorous studies, the percentage of male testers was 74% (95% CI: 58–87%) in CB-HTS and 71% (95% CI: 63–79%) in FB-HTS. This difference was not statistically significant (RR: 1.08; 95% CI: 93–1.26) and heterogeneity was high (I² = 99.6%) (Figure 4).

Figure 4.

Comparing proportion of males among those tested through CB HTS and facility-based HTS.

Stand-alone community sites (n = 20) tested the highest percentage of males (89%) (95% CI: 75–98%). Combination (n = 13), workplace (n = 3), and outreach (n = 88) models also tested primarily men, at 91% (95% CI: 65–100%), 78% (95% CI: 51–95%), and 72% (95% CI: 67–76%), respectively.

Proportion newly diagnosed with HIV

Across 18 studies, 6717 men who tested positive were newly diagnosed. The pooled prevalence of new HIV diagnosis was 96% (95% CI: 77–100%). Most studies reporting this outcome occurred in Africa (n = 11), where 90% of individuals were newly diagnosed (95% CI: 62–100%) or Europe (n = 5), where all individuals were newly diagnosed (95% CI: 100–100%). Stand-alone community sites (n = 2) and outreach testing models (n = 8) yielded the highest numbers of newly diagnosed men (100% new diagnoses) (Figure 2). Home-based (n = 6) testing models were more likely to include repeat testers than other models.

Proportion linked to care

In total, 736 HIV-positive men were linked to care, across six studies spanning four continents. Pooled estimates indicate that 70% of HIV-positive men were linked to care (95% CI: 36–103%) (Table 2). Outreach and combination approaches had the highest linkage rates. One home-based testing study from 2013 reported the lowest linkage to care (22%).²⁰² This study, along with three others demonstrating higher linkage (75%,¹³⁰ 80%,⁵⁴ 97%¹¹⁴), were conducted before 2016 recommendations regarding immediate ART initiation.¹⁴

Table 2.

Males linkage and ART initiation.

Author	Pub year	Country	Key population	Testing approach	Testing setting	Linkage to care	Linkage definition	ART initiation
Floyd	2017	Zambia	n/a	Home-based	Home-based	n/a	n/a	64%
Medley	2013	Kenya	n/a	Home-based	Home-based	22%	Enrolled or registered in care	5%
Williams	2018	Eswatini	n/a	Outreach	Mobile vans	96%	Not given	95%
Qvist	2014	Denmark	MSM	Combination	Stand alone and mobile vans at high prevalence locations	97%	Enrolled or registered in care	97%
Daskalakis	2009	USA	MSM	Outreach	Saunas/bath houses	75%	Enrolled or registered in care	n/a
Khawcharoenporn	2017	Thailand	MSM	Outreach	Saunas/bath houses	48%	Enrolled or registered in care	n/a
Champenois	2012	France	MSM	Stand-alone community site	Community-based organization	80%	Enrolled or registered in care	n/a

Proportion who initiated ART

The pooled estimate of ART initiation across four studies was 67% (95% CI: 25–98%) (Supplemental Table 4). Among the two home-based testing studies in Africa that reported ART initiation, one 2013 study reported that few (5%) HIV-positive men initiated ART,¹⁹⁶ whereas the other, published in 2017, reported that nearly two-thirds initiated ART.²⁰³ In contrast, a 2018 study in Africa that used outreach testing plus peer-based case management services reported 94% ART initiation.²⁰⁴ Finally, another study in Europe, published in 2014, reported very high ART initiation (97%) among MSM who were offered testing through multiple venues (i.e. walk-in clinic, mobile testing at saunas, sex parties, and Pride parades).¹¹⁴ The two studies reporting the highest and lowest ART initiation were published before WHO’s recommendation of test and treat.

Proportion retained in care and/or reporting viral suppression

No studies reported sex-disaggregated retention in care. Only one study in Europe reported men’s viral suppression.¹¹⁴ Among MSM who were offered combination testing, all but one achieved full viral suppression (median 8 months, IQR 5–19 months).¹¹⁴

Outcomes for men within key populations

Sex-disaggregated data for CB-HTS conducted among key populations was reported in 57 studies, 32 of which focused on MSM. Male uptake of CB-HTS within key populations, reported in eight studies across four regions, was 80% (95% CI: 70–88%). Across all regions, males comprised 91% (95% CI: 82–97%) of those tested through CB-HTS models targeting key populations. All men diagnosed with HIV through key population programming were newly diagnosed (95% CI: 94–100%). Linkage to care for HIV-positive men receiving CB-HTS through key population programming was 94% (95% CI: 88–100%), higher than men overall.

Discussion

We conducted the first global systematic review of studies implementing CB-HTS among men (general population and key populations) and found that – compared to FB-HTS – CB-HTS is highly effective in increasing men’s uptake of testing, particularly for men with previously undiagnosed HIV. In the included studies, over two-thirds of those tested through CB-HTS were men, which is higher than reported in a previous review focused only in sub-Saharan Africa (in which over half of those tested were women).³⁵ Our estimate is likely high because it includes approaches which explicitly targeted MSM and also includes recent efforts to address testing gaps among men with differentiated testing models.²⁰⁵ Still, populations reached by CB-HTS comprise greater percentages of men than previously estimated. Nevertheless, there are persistent gaps in understanding how CB-HTS affects men’s care engagement following HIV diagnosis, particularly outside of Africa. While existing evidence on linkage to care, ART initiation, and viral suppression among men receiving CB-HTS was limited, our review showed high linkage among men newly diagnosed (mostly MSM) from key population programmes. Such findings are substantial as men from key population groups face unique stigmas and barriers to HIV testing and treatment. Further examination of linkage to care, ART initiation, and viral suppression among all men who receive CB-HTS is urgently needed to understand how different testing approaches may help achieve global HIV targets.

Effectively delivering CB-HTS to men requires differentiated delivery employing multiple testing models. Our review examined several such models. Targeted outreach was most effective in increasing HIV testing uptake and new diagnoses, building on PEPFAR data demonstrating high yield for mobile testing in several countries.²⁰⁶ Available evidence (albeit of limited quality) also shows high levels of linkage in outreach models. Further work is needed to understand which linkage models convert improvements in male testing uptake to increased treatment coverage.

Findings highlight that targeted outreach is essential for reaching men with HIV from general and key populations. Targeted outreach strategies are diverse, and our study found outreach HIV testing offered in commercial settings (e.g. bars, sex-on-premises venues), social service venues (e.g. needle exchange programmes), large events (e.g. pride parades, health fairs), faith-based organizations, pharmacies and street-based mobile van testing sites. This diversity of settings enables targeted outreach approaches to effectively deliver differentiated testing, as recommended by WHO.²⁰⁵ To strengthen differentiated testing models, future research might examine cascade outcomes by setting type. Research is also needed to identify key components of outreach delivery associated with impact across settings.

Our review found that stand-alone community sites (like drop-in centers) are effective in reaching undiagnosed men with HIV, particularly MSM, outside of health facilities. Such stand-alone sites are often more accessible than health facilities, and may be more trusted by community members.^4,7,10,207 Such sites are often situated within community-based organizations which offer HTS alongside many other services. Recently, stand-alone testing has declined given its resource-intensive nature. Our findings suggest that in certain settings, maintaining such services is important to reaching men, particularly those in key populations.

In contrast, the home-based testing studies we reviewed demonstrated mixed outcomes in engaging men. While uptake was high, likely due to reduced logistical barriers, new diagnoses and linkage to care were the lowest across all models. Our findings suggest that this resource-intensive approach should be carefully employed. Home-based testing may hold particular promise for re-engaging men in care, because they disengage from care at higher rates than women.^208,209 Other efforts to modify home-based testing delivery could be explored, including offering testing in the evenings/weekend or offering HIV self-test kits for men who are not home during testing.²¹⁰ Our findings also suggest the need for robust linkage support in home-based testing. However, linkage findings may be skewed by the small sample reporting on male-specific linkage, particularly because half of the included studies were published prior to 2014.

Overall, while our review found encouraging evidence that over two-thirds of men tested through CB-HTS and diagnosed with HIV were linked to care, the small number of studies and lack of rigorous study design on linkage to care, ART initiation, care retention, and viral suppression limits assessment of whether improvements in CB-HTS HIV testing uptake can directly translate to epidemiological impact globally. Existing data posed multiple challenges to understanding outcomes of CB-HTS later in the cascade. First, studies used differing definitions of linkage to care, hampering comparability. This is particularly problematic for studies published before the “test and treat” era, as criteria for enrollment in care or pre-ART varied widely. An additional challenge is that few CB-HTS studies detailed how they supported men’s linkage to care, which hampers evaluation of different linkage strategies. Viral suppression and retention in care were rarely reported. There is urgent need to better evaluate linkage packages for CB-HTS and to track viral suppression and retention in care longitudinally, particularly among men.

Finally, based on the studies reviewed, CB-HTS appears particularly effective for men in key populations. Across all outcomes, men reached through CB-HTS models which targeted key populations fared as well or better than men reached through CB-HTS models which targeted general populations. Testing key populations through outreach and other community-based models has been standard practice given their well-documented barriers to accessing health services.²¹¹ Nonetheless, knowledge gaps persist for certain vulnerable men within key populations. For example, while PWID²¹² and some male sex workers (MSW)^213,214 face particularly high HIV risk, only two studies reported male outcomes (other than proportion men tested) for male PWID, and zero studies reported outcomes specifically for MSW. Further, across all studies, evidence of CB-HTS’s effect on linkage to care and viral suppression among key populations is nascent.

While growing evidence indicates that CB-HTS increases HIV testing coverage,³⁵ studies do not consistently report sex-disaggregated outcomes. This lack of disaggregated data hampers understanding of the impacts of CB-HTS on testing coverage among men, precluding identification of effective strategies for engaging all men.

Limitations

This review has several limitations. First, there was significant heterogeneity across studies. Pooled estimates should be interpreted with caution and with consideration of underlying social, cultural and epidemic variations. Relatedly, we were unable to fully assess regional variation given limited sample size for each outcome within each region. Second, while we report on the proportion of men tested in CB-HTS models, this outcome does not describe testing coverage within each testing catchment area. A lack of sex-disaggregated data on coverage (and on testing coverage overall) limits understanding of the impact of CB-HTS among men. Third, definitions of linkage to care varied across studies and studies published before 2013 and 2015 often had different treatment guidelines, which may have affected outcomes. Moving forward, standardized measures are key to assessing outcomes along the cascade. Relatedly, measures should also indicate whether linked individuals are newly diagnosed or re-engaged in care, which can help understand progress toward the second 95 target. Fourth, we did not examine outcomes reported for transgender women (TGW), even though they might have been considered for inclusion based on their assigned sex at birth. Understanding TGW’s testing uptake and care engagement is crucial given their risk of acquiring HIV and experiencing poor HIV-related outcomes.^215–217 Fifth, we did not examine men’s linkage to prevention services following CB-HTS, which is essential for meeting global HIV goals. Sixth, we only conducted quality assessment for experimental and quasi-experimental studies (<20% of included studies) and did not assess the potential for bias across all studies. Finally, this review includes only published studies, which may limit generalizability.

Conclusions

CB-HTS is an important strategy for reaching undiagnosed men with HIV from the general population and key population groups, particularly using targeted outreach models. When compared to FB-HTS, men tested through CB-HTS are more likely to uptake testing, and nearly all men who tested positive through CB-HTS were newly diagnosed. Linkage to care may be a challenge following CB-HTS, and greater efforts and research are needed to effectively implement testing strategies that facilitate rapid ART initiation and linkage to prevention services.

Supplemental Material

Supplemental Material - A systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence for community-based HIV testing on men’s engagement in the HIV care cascade

Supplemental Material for A systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence for community-based HIV testing on men’s engagement in the HIV care cascade by Allison K Groves, Petra Stankard, Sarah L Bowler, Muhammad S Jamil, Luwam T Gebrekristos, Patrick D Smith, Caitlin Quinn, Ndoungou Salla Ba, Thato Chidarikire, Van Thi Thuy Nguyen, Rachel Baggaley and Cheryl Johnson in International Journal of STD & AIDS

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

We thank Shedane Shaw, Lydia Norman, and Kosy Onochi for assisting the authors with data extraction and quality assessment. We thank the Drexel University library, and particularly Kathleen Turner, for her support in developing the search strategy.

Authors’ contributions

AKG and PS were jointly responsible for the design of the study. AKG, PS and SLB did the search of the reported work. AKG and PS and SLB reviewed studies for inclusion. AKG and PS and SLB did the data extraction and checking. CQ conducted the quality assessment. AKG, MSJ and LTG did the analyses. AKG and PS developed the initial draft of the manuscript, tables, and figures. All authors reviewed and interpreted the results and edited the manuscript.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by the World Health Organization's Department of Reproductive Health & Research, and through World Health Organization and Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (WHO-BMGF) grants OPP1177903 and INV-024432.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, AKG, upon reasonable request.

ORCID iDs

Patrick D Smith

Van Thi Thuy Nguyen

Supplemental Material

Supplemental material for this article is available online.

References

UNAIDS . UNAIDS global AIDS update: confronting inequalities-lessons for pandemic responses from 40 years of AIDS. Geneva, Switzerland: UNAIDS. https://www.unaids.org/en/resources/documents/2021/2021-global-aids-update (2021, accessed 15 February 2022).

UNAIDS . Fast-track-ending the AIDS epidemic. http://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/JC2686_WAD2014report_en.pdf (2014, accessed 4 April 2019).

Matovu

Wanyenze

Wabwire-Mangen

, et al. Men are always scared to test with their partners it is like taking them to the Police”: motivations for and barriers to couples’ HIV counselling and testing in Rakai, Uganda: a qualitative study. J Int AIDS Soc 2014; 17: 19160.

Hlongwa

Mashamba-Thompson

Makhunga

, et al. Barriers to HIV testing uptake among men in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review. Afr J AIDS Res 2020; 19: 13–23.

Okal

Lango

Matheka

, et al. It is always better for a man to know his HIV status”–a qualitative study exploring the context, barriers and facilitators of HIV testing among men in Nairobi, Kenya. PLoS One 2020; 15: e0231645.

Treves-Kagan

El Ayadi

Pettifor

, et al. Gender, HIV testing and stigma: the association of HIV testing behaviors and community-level and individual-level stigma in rural South Africa differ for men and women. AIDS Behav 2017; 21: 2579–2588.

Sileo

Fielding-Miller

Dworkin

, et al. What role do masculine norms play in men’s HIV testing in Sub-Saharan Africa?: a scoping review. AIDS Behav 2018; 22: 2468–2479.

DiCarlo

Mantell

Remien

, et al. ‘Men usually say that HIV testing is for women’: gender dynamics and perceptions of HIV testing in Lesotho. Cult Health Sex 2014; 16: 867–882.

Zissette

Watt

Prose

, et al. If you don’t take a stand for your life, who will help you?”: men’s engagement in HIV care in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Psychol Men Mascul 2016; 17: 265–273.

10.

Wyrod

. Masculinity and the persistence of AIDS stigma. Cult Health Sex 2011; 13: 443–456.

11.

Baggaley

Hensen

Ajose

, et al. From caution to urgency: the evolution of HIV testing and counselling in Africa. Bull World Health Organ 2012; 90: 652–658B.

12.

Gunn

Asaolu

Center

, et al. Antenatal care and uptake of HIV testing among pregnant women in sub-Saharan Africa: a cross-sectional study. J Int AIDS Soc 2016; 19: 20605.

13.

Warren

Mayhew

Hopkins

. The current status of research on the integration of sexual and reproductive health and HIV services. Stud Fam Plann 2017; 48: 91–105.

14.

World Health Organization . Consolidated guidelines on the use of antiretroviral drugs for treating and preventing HIV infection: recommendations for a public health approach. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2016.

15.

Solomon

McFall

, et al. Integrated HIV testing, prevention, and treatment intervention for key populations in India: a cluster-randomised trial. Lancet HIV 2019; 6: e283–e296.

16.

Kemp

Weiner

Sherr

, et al. Implementation science for integration of HIV and non-communicable disease services in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. AIDS Lond Engl 2018; 32(Suppl 1): S93–S105.

17.

Matanje Mwagomba

Ameh

Bongomin

, et al. Opportunities and challenges for evidence-informed HIV-noncommunicable disease integrated care policies and programs: lessons from Malawi, South Africa, Swaziland and Kenya. AIDS 2018; 32: S21.

18.

Conserve

Issango

Kilale

, et al. Developing national strategies for reaching men with HIV testing services in Tanzania: results from the male catch-up plan. BMC Health Serv Res 2019; 19: 317.

19.

Skovdal

Campbell

Madanhire

, et al. Masculinity as a barrier to men’s use of HIV services in Zimbabwe. Glob Health 2011; 7: 13.

20.

Siu

Wight

Seeley

. Masculinity, social context and HIV testing: an ethnographic study of men in Busia district, rural eastern Uganda. BMC Public Health 2014; 14: 33.

21.

Kiriazova

Lunze

Raj

, et al. It is easier for me to shoot up”: stigma, abandonment, and why HIV-positive drug users in Russia fail to link to HIV care. AIDS Care 2017; 29: 559–563.

22.

Hamilton

Shin

Taggart

, et al. HIV testing barriers and intervention strategies among men, transgender women, female sex workers and incarcerated persons in the Caribbean: a systematic review. Sex Transm Infect 2020; 96: 189–196.

23.

Irvin

Wilton

Scott

, et al. A study of perceived racial discrimination in black men who have sex with men (MSM) and its association with healthcare utilization and HIV testing. AIDS Behav 2014; 18: 1272–1278.

24.

Arnold

Rebchook

Kegeles

. ‘Triply cursed’: racism, homophobia and HIV-related stigma are barriers to regular HIV testing, treatment adherence and disclosure among young Black gay men. Cult Health Sex 2014; 16: 710–722.

25.

Andrinopoulos

Hembling

Guardado

, et al. Evidence of the negative effect of sexual minority stigma on HIV testing among MSM and transgender women in San Salvador, El Salvador. AIDS Behav 2015; 19: 60–71.

26.

Levy

Wilton

Phillips

, et al. Understanding structural barriers to accessing HIV testing and prevention services among Black men who have sex with men (BMSM) in the United States. AIDS Behav 2014; 18: 972–996.

27.

Ong

Peng

Wong

, et al. Opportunities and barriers for providing HIV testing through community health centers in mainland China: a nationwide cross-sectional survey. BMC Infect Dis 2019; 19: 1054.

28.

Calabrese

Mayer

. Stigma impedes HIV prevention by stifling patient–provider communication about U = U. J Int AIDS Soc 2020; 23: e25559.

29.

Logie

Newman

Weaver

, et al. HIV-related stigma and HIV prevention uptake among young men who have sex with men and transgender women in Thailand. AIDS Patient Care STDs 2016; 30: 92–100.

30.

Tan

RKJ

Kaur

Kumar

, et al. Clinics as spaces of costly disclosure: HIV/STI testing and anticipated stigma among gay, bisexual and queer men. Cult Health Sex 2020; 22: 307–320.

31.

Addressing a blind spot in the response to HIV—Reaching out to men and boys. https://www.unaids.org/en/resources/documents/2017/blind_spot (accessed 14 December 2020).

32.

Consolidated Guidelines on HIV Testing Services. Geneva: World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/978-92-4-155058-1/(2019, accessed 4 January 2020).

33.

Quinn

Kadengye

Johnson

, et al. Who are the missing men? characterising men who never tested for HIV from population-based surveys in six sub-Saharan African countries. J Int AIDS Soc 2019; 22: e25398.

34.

Hlongwa

Mashamba-Thompson

Makhunga

, et al. Mapping evidence of intervention strategies to improving men’s uptake to HIV testing services in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic scoping review. BMC Infect Dis 2019; 19: 496.

35.

Sharma

Ying

Tarr

, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of community and facility-based HIV testing to address linkage to care gaps in sub-Saharan Africa. Nature 2015; 528: S77–S85.

36.

Hensen

Taoka

Lewis

, et al. Systematic review of strategies to increase men’s HIV-testing in sub-Saharan Africa. AIDS Lond Engl 2014; 28: 2133–2145.

37.

Suthar

Ford

Bachanas

, et al. Towards universal voluntary HIV testing and counselling: a systematic review and meta-analysis of community-based approaches. PLoS Med 2013; 10: e1001496.

38.

Moher

Liberati

Tetzlaff

, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009; 6: e1000097.

39.

Vannakit

Jantarapakde

Pengnonyang

, et al. A cohort study of community-based test and treat for men who have sex with men and transgender women: preliminary findings from Thailand. J Int AIDS Soc 2016; 19: 156.

40.

Bogart

Wagner

Musoke

, et al. A comparison of home-based versus outreach event-based community HIV testing in Ugandan fisherfolk communities. AIDS Behav 2017; 21: 547–560.

41.

Chamie

Clark

Kabami

, et al. A hybrid mobile approach for population-wide HIV testing in rural east Africa: an observational study. Lancet HIV 2016; 3: e111–e119.

42.

Knight

Gale

Guy

, et al. A novel time-limited pop-up HIV testing service for gay men in Sydney, Australia, attracts high-risk men. Sex Health 2014; 11: 345–350.

43.

Chamie

Schaffer

Ndyabakira

, et al. A randomized trial of novel strategies to incentivize HIV testing among men in Uganda. Top Antivir Med 2017; 25: 15s.

44.

Hayes

Floyd

Schaap

, et al. A universal testing and treatment intervention to improve HIV control: one-year results from intervention communities in Zambia in the HPTN 071 (PopART) cluster-randomised trial. PLoS Med 2017; 14: e1002292.

45.

Chirawu

Langhaug

Mavhu

, et al. Acceptability and challenges of implementing voluntary counselling and testing (VCT) in rural Zimbabwe: evidence from the regai Dzive Shiri project. AIDS Care 2010; 22: 81–88.

46.

Vreeman

Nyandiko

Braitstein

, et al. Acceptance of HIV testing for children ages 18 months to 13 years identified through voluntary, home-based HIV counseling and testing in western Kenya. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2010; 55: e3–e10.

47.

Obare

Fleming

Anglewicz

, et al. Acceptance of repeat population-based voluntary counselling and testing for HIV in rural Malawi. Sex Transm Infect 2009; 85: 139–144.

48.

Kimbrough

Fisher

Jones

, et al. Accessing social networks with high rates of undiagnosed HIV infection: the social networks demonstration project. Am J Public Health 2009; 99: 1093–1099.

49.

Herce

Miller

Bula

, et al. Achieving the first 90 for key populations in sub-Saharan Africa through venue-based outreach: challenges and opportunities for HIV prevention based on PLACE study findings from Malawi and Angola. J Int AIDS Soc 2018; 21(Suppl 5): e25132.

50.

Granich

Muraguri

Doyen

, et al. Achieving universal access for human immunodeficiency virus and tuberculosis: potential prevention impact of an integrated multi-disease prevention campaign in Kenya. AIDS Res Treat 2012; 2012: 412643–412648.

51.

Khawcharoenporn

Apisarnthanarak

Phanuphak

. Active targeted HIV testing and linkage to care among men who have sex with men attending a gay sauna in Thailand. AIDS Care 2017; 29: 355–364.

52.

Lessard

Lebouche’

Engler

, et al. An analysis of socio-demographic and behavioural factors among immigrant MSM in montreal from an HIV-testing site sample. Can J Hum Sex 2016; 25: 53–60.

53.

Nglazi

van Schaik

Kranzer

, et al. An incentivized HIV counseling and testing program targeting hard-to-reach unemployed men in Cape Town, South Africa. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2012; 59: e28–e34.

54.

Champenois

Le Gall

J-M

Jacquemin

, et al. ANRS–COM’TEST: description of a community-based HIV testing intervention in non-medical settings for men who have sex with men. BMJ Open 2012; 2: e000693.

55.

Oluoch

Orwa

Lugalia

, et al. Application of psychosocial models to home-based testing and counseling (HBTC) for increased uptake and household coverage in a large informal urban settlement in Kenya. Pan Afr Med J 2017; 27: 285.

56.

Floyd

Phiri

Schaap

, et al. Art coverage after 2 years of a utt intervention in Zambia: findings from HPTN071. Top Antivir Med 2017; 25: 426s.

57.

de Beer

Chani

Feeley

, et al. Assessing the costs of mobile voluntary counseling and testing at the work place versus facility based voluntary counseling and testing in Namibia. Rural Remote Health 2015; 15: 3357.

58.

Rose

Raymond

Kellogg

, et al. Assessing the feasibility of harm reduction services for MSM: the late night breakfast buffet study. Harm Reduct J 2006; 3: 29.

59.

Belza

Hoyos

Fernández-Balbuena

, et al. Assessment of an outreach street-based HIV rapid testing programme as a strategy to promote early diagnosis: a comparison with two surveillance systems in Spain, 2008–2011. Euro Surveill 2015; 20: 21089.

60.

Meulbroek

Ditzel

Saz

, et al. BCN checkpoint, a community-based centre for men who have sex with men in Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain, shows high efficiency in HIV detection and linkage to care: efficient HIV detection at BCN Checkpoint. HIV Med 2013; 14: 25–28.

61.

Okpo

Corrigan

Gillies

. Blood borne virus (BBV) testing in a university setting in North-East Scotland: a pilot initiative. Public Health 2015; 129: 825–827.

62.

Ogirima

Muhammed

Agada

, et al. Bridging the HIV treatment gap using a door to door strategy: experience from the community care program in Benue state Nigeria.

63.

Lipsitz

Segura

Castro

, et al. Bringing testing to the people-benefits of mobile unit HIV/syphilis testing in Lima, Peru. Int J STD AIDS 2014; 25: 325–331.

64.

Holliday

Zellner

Francis

, et al. Campus and community HIV and addiction prevention (CCHAP): an HIV testing and prevention model to reach young African American adults. J Health Care Poor Underserv 2017; 28: 69–80.

65.

van Niekerk

Draper

Meehan

S-A

. Can STI screening be suitably integrated into community-based HIV testing services for men in Cape Town, South Africa?. In: 9th IAS Conference on HIV Science; 2017; Paris, France.

66.

Zhang

, et al. Case finding advantage of HIV rapid tests in community settings: men who have sex with men in 12 programme areas in China, 2011. Int J STD AIDS 2015; 26: 402–413.

67.

Bell

Martinez

Botwinick

, et al. Case finding for HIV-positive youth: a special type of hidden population. J Adolesc Health Off Publ Soc Adolesc Med 2003; 33: 10–22.

68.

Spielberg

Branson

Goldbaum

, et al. Choosing HIV counseling and testing strategies for outreach settings: a randomized trial. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2005; 38: 348–355.

69.

Hood

MacKellar

Spaulding

, et al. Client characteristics and gender-specific correlates of testing HIV positive: a comparison of standalone center versus mobile outreach HIV testing and counseling in Botswana. AIDS Behav 2012; 16: 1902–1916.

70.

Ribas Baltrons

Fernàndez-López

CasabonaBarbarà

, et al. [Cobatest network: users’ characteristics of community-based voluntary,counselling and testing centres in Spain]. Rev Esp Salud Publica 2017; 91: e201712048.

71.

Bailey

Roberts

Weatherburn

, et al. Community HIV testing for men who have sex with men: results of a pilot project and comparison of service users with those testing in genitourinary medicine clinics. Sex Transm Infect 2009; 85: 145–147.

72.

Brady

Harrison

Warriner

, et al. Community HIV testing: the feasibility and acceptability of assertive outreach and community testing to reduce the late diagnosis of HIV. HIV Med 2011; 12: 4.

73.

Shanaube

Chaila

Macleod

, et al. Community intervention improves adolescent HIV status knowledge: HPTN 071 study Zambia. Top Antivir Med 2017; 25: 354s–355s.

74.

Shanaube

Schaap

Chaila

, et al. Community intervention improves knowledge of HIV status of adolescents in Zambia: findings from HPTN 071-PopART for youth study. AIDS Lond Engl 2017; 31(Suppl 3): S221–S232.

75.

Reif

Rivera

Louis

, et al. Community-based HIV and health testing for high-risk adolescents and youth. AIDS Patient Care STDs 2016; 30: 371–378.

76.

Buchér

Thomas

Guzman

, et al. Community-based rapid HIV testing in homeless and marginally housed adults in San Francisco. HIV Med 2007; 8: 28–31.

77.

Kahn

Moseley

Thilges

, et al. Community-based screening and treatment for STDs: results from a mobile clinic initiative. Sex Transm Dis 2003; 30: 654–658.

78.

Kawichai

Celentano

Chariyalertsak

, et al. Community-based voluntary counseling and testing services in rural communities of Chiang Mai province, Northern Thailand. AIDS Behav 2007; 11: 770–777.

79.

Lugada

Levin

Abang

, et al. Comparison of home and clinic-based HIV testing among household members of persons taking antiretroviral therapy in Uganda: results from a randomized trial. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2010; 55: 245–252.

80.

Lahuerta

Sabido

Giardina

, et al. Comparison of users of an HIV/syphilis screening community-based mobile van and traditional voluntary counselling and testing sites in Guatemala. Sex Transm Infect 2011; 87: 136–140.

81.

Lister

Smith

Tabrizi

, et al. Comprehensive clinical care on-site in men-only saunas: confidential STI/HIV screening outreach clinic. Int J STD AIDS 2005; 16: 794–798.

82.

Zulliger

Maulsby

Solomon

, et al. Cost-utility of HIV testing programs among men who have sex with men in the United States. AIDS Behav 2017; 21: 619–625.

83.

Geoffroy

Khozomba

Jere

, et al. Cracking the code to increase men’s uptake of HIV testing: providing convenient and confidential outreach HIV testing services through mobile clinics. J Int AIDS Soc; 21: 47. DOI: 10.1002/jia2.25148

84.

Adetunji

Kuti

Audu

, et al. Discordant rapid HIV tests: lessons from a low-resource community. HIV Med 2018; 19: 72–76.

85.

Phiri

Shanaube

Floyd

, et al. Does a male chip increase uptake of HIV testing by men? lessons from HPTN 071 study. Top Antivir Med 2016; 24: 421–422.

86.

Kakalou

Papastamopoulos

Ioannidis

, et al. Early HIV diagnosis through use of rapid diagnosis test (RDT) in the community and direct link to HIV care: a pilot project for vulnerable populations in Athens, Greece. J Int AIDS Soc 2014; 17: 19619.

87.

Medley

Ackers

Amolloh

, et al. Early uptake of HIV clinical care after testing HIV-positive during home-based testing and counseling in western Kenya. AIDS Behav 2013; 17: 224–234.

88.

Doherty

Tabana

Jackson

, et al. Effect of home based HIV counselling and testing intervention in rural South Africa: cluster randomised trial. BMJ 2013; 346: f3481.

89.

Sibanda

Tumushime

Mufuka

, et al. Effect of non-monetary incentives on uptake of couples’ counselling and testing among clients attending mobile HIV services in rural Zimbabwe: a cluster-randomised trial. Lancet Glob Health 2017; 5: e907–e915.

90.

Liebman

Pat Lamberti

Altice

. Effectiveness of a mobile medical van in providing screening services for STDs and HIV. Public Health Nurs Boston Mass 2002; 19: 345–353.

91.

Adebajo

Eluwa

Njab

, et al. Evaluating the effect of HIV prevention strategies on uptake of HIV counselling and testing among male most-at-risk-populations in Nigeria; a cross-sectional analysis. Sex Transm Infect 2015; 91: 555–560.

92.

SEARCH Collaboration . Evaluating the feasibility and uptake of a community-led HIV testing and multi-disease health campaign in rural Uganda. J Int AIDS Soc 2017; 20: 21514.

93.

Gill

Bulman

Wallace

, et al. Evaluation of a pilot student LGBT sexual health “pop up” clinic. London, UK: British HIV Association, 2014, p. 35.

94.

Lorente

Preau

Vernay-Vaisse

, et al. Expanding access to non-medicalized community-based rapid testing to men who have sex with men: an urgent HIV prevention intervention (the ANRS-DRAG study). PLoS One 2013; 8: e61225.

95.

Asiimwe

Ross

Arinaitwe

, et al. Expanding HIV testing and linkage to care in southwestern Uganda with community health extension workers. J Int AIDS Soc 2017; 20: 21633.

96.

Knoblauch

Divall

Owuor

, et al. Experience and lessons from health impact assessment guiding prevention and control of HIV/AIDS in a copper mine project, northwestern Zambia. Infect Dis Poverty 2017; 6: 114.

97.

Zhang

Meng

, et al. Experience of offering HIV rapid testing to at-risk patients in community health centers in eight Chinese cities. PLoS One 2014; 9: e86609.

98.

Engler

Rollet

Lessard

, et al. Explaining the presence of ‘heterosexual’ female clients of a rapid HIV testing site located in the gay village of Montreal, Quebec. J Prim Care Commun Health 2016; 7: 122–129.

99.

Mulogo

Abdulaziz

Guerra

, et al. Facility and home based HIV counseling and testing: a comparative analysis of uptake of services by rural communities in southwestern Uganda. BMC Health Serv Res 2011; 11: 54.

100.

Ruzagira

Baisley

Kamali

, et al. Factors associated with uptake of home-based HIV counselling and testing and HIV care services among identified HIV-positive persons in Masaka, Uganda. AIDS Care 2018; 30: 879–887.

101.

Ngunu-Gituathi

Omai

Kongin

, et al. Fast tracking the HIV response in Nairobi city by targeted HIV testing of key populations. Kenya, 2015 In: 9th IAS Conference on HIV Science; 2017; Paris, France.

102.

O’Laughlin

Greenwald

, et al. Feasibility and acceptability of home-based HIV testing among refugees: a pilot study in Nakivale refugee settlement in southwestern Uganda. BMC Infect Dis 2018; 18: 332. DOI: 10.1186/s12879-018-3238-y

103.

Parker

Jobanputra

Rusike

, et al. Feasibility and effectiveness of two community-based HIV testing models in rural Swaziland. Trop Med Int Health TM IH 2015; 20: 893–902.

104.

Bekolo

Yimdjo Fogue

Williams

. Feasibility of integrating HIV testing into local youth development p rogrammes in cameroon. Pan Afr Med J 2018; 29: 189.

105.

Castel

Kuo

Mikre

, et al. Feasibility of using HIV care-continuum outcomes to identify geographic areas for targeted HIV testing. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2017; 74(Suppl 2): S96–S103.

106.

Negin

Wariero

Mutuo

, et al. Feasibility, acceptability and cost of home-based HIV testing in rural Kenya. Trop Med Int Health TM IH 2009; 14: 849–855.

107.

Bassett

Regan

Mbonambi

, et al. Finding HIV in hard to reach populations: mobile HIV testing and geospatial mapping in Umlazi township, Durban, South Africa. AIDS Behav 2015; 19: 1888–1895.

108.

Mabuto

Latka

Kuwane

, et al. Four models of HIV counseling and testing: utilization and test results in South Africa. PLoS One 2014; 9: e102267.

109.

Arevalo

Duran

Carrizo

, et al. Free HIV tests on public spaces: a strategy which allows easy access to diagnose in the Autonomous City of Buenos Aires (CABA). In: 9th IAS Conference on HIV Science; 2017; Paris, France.

110.

Geoffroy

Schell

Jere

, et al. Going door-to-door to reach men and young people with HIV testing services to achieve the 90-90-90 treatment targets. Public Health Action 2017; 7: 95–99.

111.

Chang

Grabowski

Ssekubugu

, et al. Heterogeneity of the HIV epidemic in agrarian, trading, and fishing communities in Rakai, Uganda: an observational epidemiological study. Lancet HIV 2016; 3: e388–e396.

112.

Ferrer

Loureiro

Meulbroek

, et al. High HIV incidence among men who have sex with men attending a community-based voluntary counselling and testing service in Barcelona, Spain: results from the ITACA cohort. Sex Transm Infect 2016; 92: 70–75.

113.

van Rooyen

Barnabas

Baeten

, et al. High HIV testing uptake and linkage to care in a novel program of home-based HIV counseling and testing with facilitated referral in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2013; 64: e1–e8.

114.

Qvist

Cowan

Graugaard

, et al. High linkage to care in a community-based rapid HIV testing and counseling project among men who have sex with men in copenhagen. Sex Transm Dis 2014; 41: 209–214.

115.

Tumwesigye

Wana

Kasasa

, et al. High uptake of home-based, district-wide, HIV counseling and testing in Uganda. AIDS Patient Care STDs 2010; 24: 735–741.

116.

Mahachi

Muchedzi

Moga

, et al. High yields attained through HIV household index case testing in Zimbabwe: the case of the FHI 360 Zimbabwe HIV care and treatment project. In: 9th IAS Conference on HIV Science; 2017; Paris, France.

117.

Fernández-Balbuena

de la Fuente

Hoyos

, et al. Highly visible street-based HIV rapid testing: is it an attractive option for a previously untested population? a cross-sectional study. Sex Transm Infect 2014; 90: 112–118.

118.

Booth

Davis

Dvoryak

, et al. HIV incidence among people who inject drugs (PWIDs) in Ukraine: results from a clustered randomised trial. Lancet HIV 2016; 3: e482–e489.

119.

Okiria

Okui

Dutki

, et al. HIV incidence and factors associated with seroconversion in a rural community home based counseling and testing program in Eastern Uganda. AIDS Behav 2014; 18(Suppl 1): S60–S68.

120.

Hoenigl

Chaillon

Morris

, et al. HIV infection rates and risk behavior among young men undergoing community-based testing in San Diego. Sci Rep 2016; 6: 25927.

121.

Bingham

Secura

Behel

, et al. HIV risk factors reported by two samples of male bathhouse attendees in Los Angeles, California, 2001???2002. Sex Transm Dis 2008; 35: 631–636.

122.

DiFranceisco

Holtgrave

Hoxie

, et al. HIV seropositivity rates in outreach-based counseling and testing services: program evaluation. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol 1998; 19: 282–288.

123.

Osoti

John-Stewart

Kiarie

, et al. Home visits during pregnancy enhance male partner HIV counselling and testing in Kenya: a randomized clinical trial. AIDS Lond Engl 2014; 28: 95–103.

124.

Krakowiak

Kinuthia

Osoti

, et al. Home-based HIV testing among pregnant couples increases partner testing and identification of serodiscordant partnerships. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2016; 72(Suppl 2): S167–S173.

125.

Dalal

Feikin

Amolloh

, et al. Home-based HIV testing and counseling in rural and urban Kenyan communities. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2013; 62: e47–e54.

126.

Roland

Block

Bachanas

, et al. Home-based testing identifies more previously undiagnosed older men than mobile testing in Botswana. J Int AIDS Soc; 21: 49. DOI: 10.1002/jia2.25148

127.

Mutale

Michelo

Jürgensen

, et al. Home-based voluntary HIV counselling and testing found highly acceptable and to reduce inequalities. BMC Public Health 2010; 10: 347.

128.

Velen

Lewis

Charalambous

, et al. Household HIV testing uptake among contacts of TB patients in South Africa. PLoS One 2016; 11: e0155688.

129.

Wasantioopapokakorn

Manopaiboon

Phoorisri

, et al. Implementation and assessment of a model to increase HIV testing among men who have sex with men and transgender women in Thailand, 2011-2016. AIDS Care 2018; 30: 1239–1245.

130.

Daskalakis

Silvera

Bernstein

, et al. Implementation of HIV testing at 2 New York city bathhouses: from pilot to clinical service. Clin Infect Dis 2009; 48: 1609–1616.

131.

Muchedzi

Mahachi

Moga

, et al. Improving technical efficiency: reaching first 90 through community index HIV sexual network testing in Zimbabwe. The case of FHI 360 Zimbabwe. J Int AIDS Soc 2018; 21: 27. DOI: 10.1002/jia2.25148

132.

McCoy

Shiu

Martz

, et al. Improving the efficiency of HIV testing with peer recruitment, financial incentives, and the involvement of persons living with HIV infection. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2013; 63: e56–e63.

133.

Kranzer

Govindasamy

van Schaik

, et al. Incentivized recruitment of a population sample to a mobile HIV testing service increases the yield of newly diagnosed cases, including those in need of antiretroviral therapy. HIV Med 2012; 13: 132–137.

134.

Grabbe

Menzies

Taegtmeyer

, et al. Increasing access to HIV counseling and testing through mobile services in Kenya: strategies, utilization, and cost-effectiveness. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2010; 54: 317–323.

135.

de la Fuente

Delgado

Hoyos

, et al. Increasing early diagnosis of HIV through rapid testing in a street outreach program in Spain. AIDS Patient Care STDs 2009; 23: 625–629.

136.

Mutch

Lui

C-W

Dean

, et al. Increasing HIV testing among hard-to-reach groups: examination of RAPID, a community-based testing service in Queensland, Australia. BMC Health Serv Res 2017; 17: 310.

137.

Galvan

Bluthenthal

Ani

, et al. Increasing HIV testing among latinos by bundling HIV testing with other tests. J Urban Health 2006; 83: 849–859.

138.

Suggaravetsiri

Yanai

Chongsuvivatwong

, et al. Integrated counseling and screening for tuberculosis and HIV among household contacts of tuberculosis patients in an endemic area of HIV infection: Chiang Rai, Thailand. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2003; 7: S424–S431.

139.

Des Jarlais

Duong

Pham Minh

, et al. Integrated respondent-driven sampling and peer support for persons who inject drugs in Haiphong, Vietnam: a case study with implications for interventions. AIDS Care 2016; 28: 1312–1315.

140.

Brunie

Mucheri

PNW

Akol

, et al. Integrating family planning and HIV services at the community level: formative assessment with village health teams in Uganda. Afr J Reprod Health 2017; 21: 73–80.

141.

Casalini

Boyee

Ndolichimpa

, et al. Key population risk factors associated with differentiated HIV care in Tanzania. In: 9th IAS Conference on HIV Science; 2017; Paris, France.

142.

Milligan

Cuneo

Rutstein

, et al. ‘Know your status’: results from a novel, student-run HIV testing initiative on college campuses. AIDS Educ Prev 2014; 26: 317–327.

143.

Govindasamy

van Schaik

Kranzer

, et al. Linkage to HIV care from a mobile testing unit in South Africa by different CD4 count strata. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2011; 58: 344–352.

144.

Van der Borght

Schim van der Loeff

Clevenbergh

, et al. Long-term voluntary counseling and testing (VCT) uptake dynamics in a multicountry HIV workplace program in sub-Saharan Africa. AIDS Care 2010; 22: 195–205.

145.

Pham

. Low HIV incidence but high HCV incidence among people who inject drugs in Haiphong, Vietnam: results of the ANRS 12299/NIDA P30DA011041 DRIVE-IN study. In: 9th IAS Conference on HIV Science; 2017; Paris, France.

146.

Krisintu

Avery

Sattayapanich

, et al. Making mobile HIV testing available for high-risk MSM in saunas. In: 9th IAS Conference on HIV Science; 2017; Paris, France.

147.

Mark

Kinuthia

Osoti

, et al. Male partner acceptance of home-based syphilis and HIV testing offered to couples during pregnancy. J Int AIDS Soc 2015; 18: 110.

148.

Bitimwine

. Maximizing targeted testing to improve HIV yield among children and adolescents in Rwenzori region. Uganda: Baylor College of Medicine Children’s Foundation.

149.

Olawore

Tobian

Nalugoda

, et al. Migration, gender, and HIV incidence in Rakai, Uganda. Top Antivir Med 2017; 25: 428s.

150.

van Rooyen

McGrath

Chirowodza

, et al. Mobile VCT: reaching men and young people in urban and rural South African pilot studies (NIMH Project Accept, HPTN 043). AIDS Behav 2013; 17: 2946–2953.

151.

Kawichai

Celentano

Srithanaviboonchai

, et al. NIMH project accept (HPTN 043) HIV/AIDS community mobilization (CM) to promote mobile HIV voluntary counseling and testing (MVCT) in rural communities in Northern Thailand: modifications by experience. AIDS Behav 2012; 16: 1227–1237.

152.

Wood

Ellks

Grobicki

. Outreach sexual infection screening and postal tests in men who have sex with men: are they comparable to clinic screening? Int J STD AIDS 2015; 26: 428–431.

153.

Darin

Klepser

, et al. Pharmacist-provided rapid HIV testing in two community pharmacies. J Am Pharm Assoc 2015; 55: 81–88.

154.

Ijadunola

Abiona

Balogun

, et al. Provider-initiated (Opt-out) HIV testing and counselling in a group of university students in Ile-Ife, Nigeria. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2011; 16: 387–396.

155.

Stein

Green

Bell

, et al. Provision of HIV counseling and testing services at five community-based organizations among young men of color who have sex with men. AIDS Behav 2011; 15: 743–750.

156.

Williams

Mackellar

Dlamini

, et al. Rapid ART initiation and index client testing outcomes of commlink, a community-based, HIV testing, mobile HIV care, and peer-delivered, linkage case management program-Swaziland. J Int AIDS Soc 2017; 21: 77. DOI: 10.1002/jia2.25148

157.

Mdodo

Thomas

Walker

, et al. Rapid HIV testing at gay pride events to reach previously untested MSM: U.S., 2009–2010. Public Health Rep 2014; 129: 328–334.

158.

Keenan

. Rapid HIV testing in urban outreach: a strategy for improving posttest counseling rates. AIDS Educ Prev 2001; 13: 541–550.

159.

Liang

Erbelding

Jacob

, et al. Rapid HIV testing of clients of a mobile STD/HIV clinic. AIDS Patient Care STDs 2005; 19: 253–257.

160.

Lugada

Millar

Haskew

, et al. Rapid implementation of an integrated large-scale HIV counseling and testing, malaria, and diarrhea prevention campaign in rural Kenya. PLoS One 2010; 5: e12435.

161.

Morin

Khumalo-Sakutukwa

Charlebois

, et al. Removing barriers to knowing HIV status: same-day mobile HIV testing in Zimbabwe. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2006; 41: 218–224.

162.

Marcus

Ort

Grenz

, et al. Risk factors for HIV and STI diagnosis in a community-based HIV/STI testing and counselling site for men having sex with men (MSM) in a large German city in 2011–2012. BMC Infect Dis 2015; 15: 14.

163.

Bradshaw

. Screening injecting drug users for sexually transmitted infections and blood borne viruses using street outreach and self collected sampling. Sex Transm Infect 2005; 81: 53–58.

164.

Helleringer

Mkandawire

Reniers

, et al. Should home-based HIV testing and counseling services be offered periodically in programs of ARV treatment as prevention? a case study in Likoma (Malawi). AIDS Behav 2013; 17: 2100–2108.

165.

Daniels

Komarek

Forgreive

, et al. Shout-it-now: a mobile HCT model employing technology and edutainment in South Africa. J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care 2017; 16: 506–511.

166.

Smyrnov

Williams

Korobchuk

, et al. Social network approaches to locating undiagnosed HIV cases are more effective than RDS recruitment or outreach models.. In: 9th IAS Conference on HIV Science; 2017; Paris, France.

167.

Maheswaran

Thulare

Stanistreet

, et al. Starting a home and mobile HIV testing service in a rural area of South Africa. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2012; 59: e43–e46.

168.

Fylkesnes

Sandøy

Jürgensen

, et al. Strong effects of home-based voluntary HIV counselling and testing on acceptance and equity: a cluster randomised trial in Zambia. Soc Sci Med 2013; 86: 9–16.

169.

Justman

Reed

Bicego

, et al. Swaziland HIV incidence measurement survey (SHIMS): a prospective national cohort study. Lancet HIV 2017; 4: e83–e92.

170.

Sinha

Moll

Brooks

, et al. Synergism between diabetes and human immunodeficiency virus in increasing the risk of tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2018; 22: 793–799.

171.

Fernàndez-López

Reyes-Urueña

Agustí

, et al. The COBATEST network: a platform to perform monitoring and evaluation of HIV community-based testing practices in Europe and conduct operational research. AIDS Care 2016; 28(Suppl 1): 32–36.

172.

Ifekandu

Suleiman

Aniekwe

. The cost-effectiveness in the use of HIV counselling and testing-mobile outreaches in reaching men who have sex with men (MSM) in northern Nigeria. J Int AIDS Soc 2014; 17: 19610.

173.

Menzies

Abang

Wanyenze

, et al. The costs and effectiveness of four HIV counseling and testing strategies in Uganda. AIDS Lond Engl 2009; 23: 395–401.

174.

Cawley

Wringe

Slaymaker

, et al. The impact of voluntary counselling and testing services on sexual behaviour change and HIV incidence: observations from a cohort study in rural Tanzania. BMC Infect Dis 2014; 14: 159.

175.

Yan

Zhang

Zhao

, et al. The increased effectiveness of HIV preventive intervention among men who have sex with men and of follow-up care for people living with HIV after ‘task-shifting’ to community-based organizations: a ‘cash on service delivery’ model in China. PLoS One 2014; 9: e103146.

176.

Castro

Ribeiro-Alves

Corrêa

, et al. The men who have sex with men HIV care cascade in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. PLoS One 2016; 11: e0157309.

177.

Camacho-Gonzalez

Gillespie

Thomas-Seaton

, et al. The metropolitan Atlanta community adolescent rapid testing initiative study: closing the gaps in HIV care among youth in Atlanta, Georgia, USA. AIDS Lond Engl 2017; 31(Suppl 3): S267–S275.

178.

Fernández-Balbuena

Marcos

Pérez-Rubio

, et al.

The rapid test in Spanish pharmacies: a novel programme to reach heterosexual men?

HIV Med 2015; 16: 362–369.

179.

Tafuma

Mahachi

Dziwa

, et al. Time taken to link newly identified HIV positive clients to care following a home-base index case HIV testing: experience from two provinces in Zimbabwe. PLoS ONE; 13: e0201018. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201018

180.

Okoko

Guze

Ndolo

, et al. Toward the first 90: identifying and testing younger populations for HIV at community outreach events in Kenya.

181.

Floyd

Ayles

Schaap

, et al. Towards 90–90: findings after two years of the HPTN 071 (PopART) cluster-randomized trial of a universal testing-and-treatment intervention in Zambia. PLoS One; 13: e0197904. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197904

182.

Were

Mermin

Wamai

, et al. Undiagnosed HIV infection and couple HIV discordance among household members of HIV-infected people receiving antiretroviral therapy in Uganda. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2006; 43: 91–95.

183.

Lazarus

Patel

Shaw

, et al. Uptake of Community-Based Peer Administered HIV Point-of-Care Testing: Findings from the PROUD Study. PLOS ONE 2016; 11(12): e0166942. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166942

184.

Khawcharoenporn

Chunloy

Apisarnthanarak

. Uptake of HIV testing and counseling, risk perception and linkage to HIV care among Thai university students. BMC Public Health 2016; 16: 556.

185.

Wringe

Isingo

Urassa

, et al. Uptake of HIV voluntary counselling and testing services in rural Tanzania: implications for effective HIV prevention and equitable access to treatment. Trop Med Int Health 2008; 13: 319–327.

186.

Mark

Kinuthia

Roxby

, et al. Uptake of home-based syphilis and human immunodeficiency virus testing among male partners of pregnant women in Western Kenya. Sex Transm Dis 2017; 44: 533–538.

187.

Baisley

Doyle

Changalucha

, et al. Uptake of voluntary counselling and testing among young people participating in an HIV prevention trial: comparison of opt-out and opt-in strategies. PLoS One 2012; 7: e42108.

188.

DiCarlo

Zerbe

Peters

, et al. Use of index patients to enable home-based testing in lesotho. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2017; 76: e61–e64.

189.

van Zyl

Brown

Pahl

. Using a call center to encourage linkage to care following mobile HIV counseling and testing. AIDS Care 2015; 27: 921–925.

190.

Outlaw

Naar-King

Parsons

, et al. Using motivational interviewing in HIV field outreach with young African American men who have sex with men: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Public Health 2010; 100: S146–S151.

191.

Arumainayagam

Grimshaw

Acharya

, et al. Value of targeting at-risk populations at outreach venues: findings from a local sauna. Int J STD AIDS 2009; 20: 642–643.

192.

Ezeanolue

Obiefune

Yang

, et al. What do you need to get male partners of pregnant women tested for HIV in resource limited settings? the baby shower cluster randomized trial. AIDS Behav 2017; 21: 587–596.

193.

Shanaube

Schaap

Floyd

, et al. What works-reaching universal HIV testing: lessons from HPTN 071 (PopART) trial in Zambia. AIDS Lond Engl 2017; 31: 1555–1564.

194.

Ostermann

Reddy

Shorter

, et al. Who tests, who doesn’t, and why? uptake of mobile HIV counseling and testing in the Kilimanjaro Region of Tanzania. PLoS One 2011; 6: e16488.

195.

Fernández-Balbuena

Belza

Zulaica

, et al. Widening the access to HIV testing: the contribution of three in-pharmacy testing programmes in Spain. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0134631.

196.

Higgins

Altman

Gøtzsche

, et al. The cochrane collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2011; 343: d5928.

197.

Peterson

Welch

Losos

, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Liverpool, UK: University of Liverpool.

198.

Freeman

Tukey

. Transformations related to the angular and the square root. Ann Math Stat 1950; 21: 607–611.

199.

Higgins

Thompson

. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis. Stat Med 2002; 21: 1539–1558.

200.

SAS Institute Inc . SAS Version 9.4. Cary, NC, 2013.

201.

StataCorp . Stata statistical software: release 17. College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC, 2021.

202.

Medley

Ackers

Amolloh

, et al. Early uptake of HIV clinical care after testing HIV-positive during home-based testing and counseling in western Kenya. AIDS Behav 2013; 17: 224–234.

203.

Floyd

Phiri

Schaap

, et al. Art coverage after 2 years of a utt intervention in Zambia: findings from HPTN071. Top Antivir Med 2017; 25: 426s.

204.

Williams

Mackellar

Dlamini

205.

World Health Organization . Improving men’s uptake of HIV testing and linkage to services, 2021.

206.

Drammeh

Medley

Dale

, et al. Sex differences in HIV testing—20 PEPFAR-supported sub-Saharan African countries. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2020; 69: 1801–1806.

207.

Leichliter

Paz-Bailey

Friedman

, et al. ‘Clinics aren’t meant for men’: sexual health care access and seeking behaviours among men in Gauteng province, South Africa. SAHARA J J Soc Asp HIVAIDS Res Alliance 2011; 8: 82–88.

208.

Kranzer

Lewis

Ford

, et al. Treatment interruption in a primary care antiretroviral therapy program in South Africa: cohort analysis of trends and risk factors. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2010; 55: e17–e23.

209.

Ochieng-Ooko

Ochieng

Sidle

, et al. Influence of gender on loss to follow-up in a large HIV treatment programme in western Kenya. Bull World Health Organ 2010; 88: 681–688.

210.

Novitsky

Bussmann

Okui

, et al. Estimated age and gender profile of individuals missed by a home-based HIV testing and counselling campaign in a Botswana community. J Int AIDS Soc 2015; 18: 19918.

211.

World Health Organization . Consolidated guidelines on HIV prevention, diagnosis, treatment and care for key populations. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. http://proxy.library.carleton.ca/loginurl=https://www.deslibris.ca/ID/10063272 (2016, accessed 17 December 2020).

212.

Degenhardt

Peacock

Colledge

, et al. Global prevalence of injecting drug use and sociodemographic characteristics and prevalence of HIV, HBV, and HCV in people who inject drugs: a multistage systematic review. Lancet Glob Health 2017; 5: e1192–e1207.

213.

Baral

Friedman

Geibel

, et al. Male sex workers: practices, contexts, and vulnerabilities for HIV acquisition and transmission. Lancet 2015; 385: 260–273.

214.

Shannon

Crago

A-L

Baral

, et al. The global response and unmet actions for HIV and sex workers. Lancet Lond Engl 2018; 392: 698–710.

215.

Baral

Poteat

Strömdahl

, et al. Worldwide burden of HIV in transgender women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 2013; 13: 214–222.

216.

Zalla

Herce

Edwards

, et al. The burden of HIV among female sex workers, men who have sex with men and transgender women in Haiti: results from the 2016 priorities for local AIDS control efforts (PLACE) study. J Int AIDS Soc 2019; 22: e25281.

217.

Klein

Psihopaidas

Xavier

, et al. HIV-related outcome disparities between transgender women living with HIV and cisgender people living with HIV served by the health resources and services administration’s Ryan white HIV/AIDS program: a retrospective study. PLoS Med 2020; 17: e1003125.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

1.12 MB