The decentralization of authority, capability and finance is widely considered to be best practice in urban risk governance. Drawing on the concept of misframing from critical justice theory, we analyse injustices arising from the de jure decentralization of risk governance in Nepal, scrutinizing multi-scalar urban risk governance and its impact on resilient and equitable urban planning. Informed by qualitative research conducted from 2019 to 2024, we ask: How does the (mis)framing of risk governance affect local actors’ capacities to manage risks? And to what extent can inclusive, risk-informed urban planning and policy facilitate just decentralization? We identify a disconnect between risk-management responsibilities assigned to local government and its capacity to meet these expectations. Proposing a typology of misframing, we provide recommendations for the design and deployment of more equitable and contextually appropriate financial, technological and administrative decentralization as a pathway to justice that can overcome rigid scalar jurisdictions.
AllenK M (2006), “Community-based disaster preparedness and climate adaptation: local capacity-building in the Philippines”, DisastersVol 20, No 1, pages 81–101.
2.
ArnsteinS R (1969), “A ladder of citizen participation”, Journal of the American Institute of PlannersVol 35, No 4, pages 216–224.
BatterburyS P JFernandoJ L (2006), “Rescaling governance and the impacts of political and environmental decentralization: an introduction”, World DevelopmentVol 34, No 11, pages 1851–1863.
5.
BlackburnS (2014), “The politics of scale and disaster risk governance: barriers to decentralisation in Portland, Jamaica”, GeoforumVol 52, pages 101–112.
6.
BlaikieP (2006), “Is small really beautiful? Community-based natural resource management in Malawi and Botswana”, World DevelopmentVol 34, No 11, pages 1942–1957.
7.
BrownC JPurcellM (2005), “There’s nothing inherent about scale: political ecology, the local trap, and the politics of development in the Brazilian Amazon”, GeoforumVol 36, pages 607–624.
8.
BulkeleyHEdwardsG A SFullerS (2014), “Contesting climate justice in the city: examining politics and practice in urban climate change experiments”, Global Environmental ChangeVol 25, pages 31–40.
CashD WAdgerW NBerkesFGardenPLebelLOlssonPPritchardLYoungO (2006), “Scale and cross-scale dynamics: governance and information in a multilevel world”, Ecology and SocietyVol 11, No 2, pages 12.
11.
ChuEIsabelleACarminJ (2016), “Inclusive approaches to urban climate adaptation planning and implementation in the Global South”, Climate PolicyVol 16, No 3, pages 372–392.
12.
ComelliTPellingMHopeMEnsorJFilippiM EMenteşeE YMcCloskeyJ (2024), “Normative future visioning: a critical pedagogy for transformative adaptation”, Buildings and CitiesVol 5, No 1, pages 83–100.
13.
CornwallA (2008), “Unpacking ‘participation’: models, meanings and practices”, Community Development JournalVol 43, No 3, pages 269–283.
14.
DonovanA (2016), “Geopower: reflections on the critical geography of disasters”, Progress in Human GeographyVol 41, No 1, pages 44–67.
15.
EnsorJHarveyB (2015), “Social learning and climate change adaptation: evidence for international development practice”, WIREs Climate ChangeVol 6, No 5, pages 509–522.
16.
FaguetJ-P (2014), “Decentralization and governance”, World DevelopmentVol 53, pages 2–13.
17.
FainsteinS S (2016), “Spatial justice and planning”, in FainsteinS SDeFilippisJ (editors), Readings in Planning Theory (fourth edition), Wiley Blackwell, West Sussex, pages 258–272.
18.
FontanaCTestiAAllegrettiGZettiIRossiM (2025), “Embedding justice into climate policies through participatory approaches: prospects and pitfalls toward community-based adaptation pathways in Bologna, Italy”, CitiesVol 163, pages 105998.
19.
FraserN (2008), “Social justice in the age of identity politics: redistribution, recognition, and participation”, in HendersonGWaterstoneM (editors), Geographic Thought: A Praxis Perspective, Routledge, Abingdon, pages 72–89.
20.
FraserN (2009), Scales of Justice: Reimagining Political Space in a Globalizing World, Columbia University Press, New York, 224 pages.
21.
GaillardJ CMercerJ (2012), “From knowledge to action: bridging gaps in disaster risk reduction”, Progress in Human GeographyVol 37, No 1, pages 93–114.
22.
GeekiyanageDFernandoTKeraminiyageK (2021), “Mapping participatory methods in the urban development process: a systematic review and case-based evidence analysis”, SustainabilityVol 13, No 16, pages 8992.
23.
HamdaniehLStephensCOlyaeemaneshAOstadtaghizadehA (2024), “Social justice: the unseen key pillar in disaster risk management”, International Journal of Disaster Risk ReductionVol 101, pages 104229.
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2022), Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Report prepared for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 3056 pages.
26.
JonesSAryalKCollinsA (2013), “Local-level governance of risk and resilience in Nepal”, DisastersVol 37, No 3, pages 442–467.
27.
JonesSManyenaBWalshS (2015), “Disaster risk governance: evolution and influences”, in CollinsA EShroderJ FJonesSManyenaBJayawickramaJ (editors), Hazards, Risks, and Disasters in Society. Elsevier Academic Press.
28.
MarksDLebelL (2016), “Disaster governance and the scalar politics of incomplete decentralization: fragmented and contested responses to the 2011 floods in Central Thailand”, Habitat InternationalVol 52, pages 57–66.
29.
MarstonS A (2000), “The social construction of scale”, Progress in Human GeographyVol 24, No 2, pages 219–242.
30.
MoFAGA (2017), Local Governance Operation Acto 2017 [in Nepali], Ministry of Federal Affairs and General Administration (MoFAGA), Government of Nepal, Kathmandu, page 86.
31.
MohanGStokkeK (2000), “Participatory development and empowerment: the dangers of localism”, Third World QuarterlyVol 21, No 2, pages 247–268.
32.
MustafaD (2005), “The production of an urban hazardscape in Pakistan: modernity, vulnerability, and the range of choice”, Annals of the Association of American GeographersVol 95, No 3, pages 566–586.
33.
NepaliG S (2015), The Newars: An Ethno-Sociological Study of a Himalayan Community (second edition), Mandala Book Point, Kathmandu, 476 pages.
34.
PachecoP (2004), “What lies behind decentralisation? Forest, powers and actors in lowland Bolivia”, The European Journal of Development ResearchVol 16, No 1, pages 90–109.
35.
ParsonsMAsenaQJohnsonDJ NalauJ (2024), “A bibliometric and topic analysis of climate justice: mapping trends, voices, and the way forward”, Climate Risk ManagementVol 44, page 100593.
36.
PellingM (2007), “Learning from others: the scope and challenges for participatory disaster risk assessment”, DisastersVol 31, No 4, pages 373–385.
37.
PellingM (2011), Adaptation to Climate Change: From Resilience to Transformation, Routledge, New York, 274 pages.
38.
PoudelD PBlackburnS (2020), Mapping DRR Institutions and Actors Across Scales From Centre to Local: Kathmandu, Nepal, SIAS, Tomorrow’s Cities, UKRI and GCRF, Kathmandu, available at http://dx.doi.org/10.7488/era/1816.
PoudelD PBlackburnSManandharRAdhikariBEnsorJShresthaATimsinaN P (2023), “The urban political ecology of ‘haphazard urbanisation’ and disaster risk creation in the Kathmandu valley, Nepal”, International Journal of Disaster Risk ReductionVol 96, page 1–19.
RamkumarS (2022), “Whose responsibility is it anyway? Accountability and standpoints for disaster risk reduction in Nepal”, Thesis, Durham University, Durham, available at https://etheses.dur.ac.uk/14928.
45.
RawlsJ (1971), A Theory of Justice, Harvard University Press.
46.
RussellCClarkJHannahDSugdenF (2021), “Towards a collaborative governance regime for disaster risk reduction: exploring scalar narratives of institutional change in Nepal”, Applied GeographyVol 134, page 102516.
47.
SchlosbergD (2007), Defining Environmental Justice: Theories, Movements, and Nature, Oxford University Press.
48.
SkidmoreMToyaH (2013), “Natural disaster impacts and fiscal decentralization”, Land EconomicsVol 89, No 1, pages 101–117.
49.
SojaE W (2013), Seeking Spatial Justice, University of Minnesota Press.
50.
StableinM JGonzalez CruzJFidanE NTalbotJReedS PWaltersR SOgunyiolaA JFernández FreyMRamirezMRosado CasanovaBHeemstraJMarshallARodríguezL F (2022), “Compound[ing] disasters in Puerto Rico: pathways for virtual transdisciplinary collaboration to enhance community resilience”, Global Environmental ChangeVol 76, page 102558.
51.
SultanaF (2022), “Critical climate justice”, The Geographical JournalVol 188, No 1, pages 118– 124.
52.
SwyngedouwE (2004), “Scaled geographies: nature, place, and the politics of scale”, in SheppardEMcMasterB (editors), Scale and Geographic Enquiry: Nature, Society, and Method, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, pages 1–22.
53.
TimsinaN PPoudelD PManandharRAdhikariB (2021), “Political economy of urban change in Kathmandu Valley: a case from Southern Lalitpur Metropolitan City”, New Angle: Nepal Journal of Social Science and Public PolicyVol 7, No 1, pages 11–31.
54.
TseliosVTompkinsE (2017), “Local government, political decentralisation and resilience to natural hazard-associated disasters”, Environmental HazardsVol 16, No 3, pages 228–252.
YoungI M (2016 [1990]), “Justice and the politics of difference”, in BlaugRSchwarzmantelJ (editors), Democracy: A Reader (second edition), Columbia University Press, New York, pages 553–557.
57.
ZiervogelGEnqvistJMetelerkampLvan BredaJ (2021), “Supporting transformative climate adaptation: community-level capacity building and knowledge co-creation in South Africa”, Climate PolicyVol 22, No. 5, pages 607–622.
