Recovering the (hi)stories of popular urbanism in revolutionary times: insights from conversations with TUPAU and Taller 5 architects on critical pedagogy,the politics of participation and urban design in Guayaquil,Ecuador
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online October, 2025
Recovering the (hi)stories of popular urbanism in revolutionary times: insights from conversations with TUPAU and Taller 5 architects on critical pedagogy,the politics of participation and urban design in Guayaquil,Ecuador
This paper describes the attempt to preserve the memory of a rich experience within an innovative university–grassroots alliance developed in Guayaquil (Ecuador) in the 1970s to support rural and urban migrants in their struggles for land and housing. The investigation is based on the oral testimony of architecture students and professors who were part of a Marxist-influenced workshop at the University of Guayaquil, and is rooted in questions raised by grassroots leaders about the unavailability of technical assistance aligned with their concerns. The paper shares the first steps in a systematic effort to understand the collaborative networks established by grassroots organizations and scholars and the spatial practices stemming from them in a unique moment of Marxist-inspired design activism. This effort intersects with contemporary international debates around the politics of participation, mediated through numerous articulations in Latin America of the user–designer relationship, and the components of popular urbanism.
BethellL (editor) (1984), The Cambridge History of Latin America, Vol 6, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
6.
BravoKPérezD (2020), “El Gobierno Revolucionario Nacionalista Ecuatoriano del General Guillermo Rodríguez Lara (1972–1976): liderazgo, transformaciones y claves sobre el sistema político ecuatoriano”, Revista PUCENo 110, pages 161–182.
7.
CarranzaM (2010), “Innovaciones en la enseñanza: el desembarco de los talleres verticales en arquitectura (1955–1966)”, in EcheverríaMVestfridP (editors), Tridecaedro: Jóvenes investigadores en ciencias sociales de la UNLP, Editorial de la Universidad Nacional de La Plata, La Plata, pages 25–43.
8.
CarranzaM (2014), “Entrelazamientos. Cultura política y cultura del espacio en el VII Congreso Mundial de Arquitectos de la UIA, La Habana, Cuba, 1963”, RegistrosVol 11, pages 40–56.
9.
CuevaA (1987), El desarrollo del capitalismo en América Latina, Siglo XXI Editores, Mexico.
10.
Cusicanqui RiveraS (1987), “El potencial epistemológico y teórico de la historia oral: de la lógica instrumental a la descolonización de la historia”, Revista Temas SocialesVol 11, pages 49–64.
11.
DebrayR (2005), “The Latin American revolution and the religious turn”, Latin American PerspectivesVol 32, No 2, pages 7–21.
12.
EscobarASAlvarez (editors) (1992), The Making of Social Movements in Latin America: Identity, Strategy, Democracy, Westview Press, Boulder, CO.
13.
FreireP (1974), The Pedagogy of the Oppressed, Penguin Books, London.
14.
GiannottiE (2014), “Orígenes de un diseño participativo: la construcción de los barrios populares de Santiago, 1952–1973”, RevistaVol 180, No 34, pages 22–29, available at https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/135983.
15.
GiannotttiESoares GonçalvesR (2020), “La guerra fría en las favelas y las poblaciones, 1945–1964. Una disputa entre comunistas e Iglesia Católica”, IzquierdasVol 49, pages 642–662.
16.
GodardH R (1988), “Quito, Guayaquil: evolución y consolidación en ocho barrios populares”, Centro de Investigaciones CIUDAD, Quito.
17.
GygerH (2019), Improvised Cities: Architecture, Urbanization & Innovation in Peru, Pittsburgh University Press, Pittsburgh, PA.
18.
HaleC R (editor) (2008), Engaging Contradictions: Theory, Politics, and Methods of Activist Scholarship, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
19.
Herdoíza MeraW (1993), La calle, la universidad y el urbanismo, AUTORES VARIOS CEL, Quito, Ecuador.
20.
Jara HollidayO (2011), “Orientaciones teórico-prácticas para la sistematización de experiencias”, Centro de Estudios y Publicaciones Alforja, San José, Costa Rica.
21.
LaclauE (1977), Politics and Ideology in Marxist Theory, Verso, New York.
22.
LaraF L (2022), “Participatory design in Latin America learning from the global South”, in HarrissHSalamaA MGonzalez LaraA (editors), The Routledge Companion to Architectural Pedagogies of the Global South, Routledge, Abingdon and New York, pages 174–185.
23.
LathamALaytonJ (2019), “Social infrastructure and the public life of cities: studying urban sociality and public spaces”, Geography CompassVol 13, No 7, e12444.
24.
LeónJ (1987), “Clientelismo y política en sectores urbanos”, Ecuador Debate Issue no 13, Centro Andino de Acción Popular, Quito.
25.
LinzJ J (1973), The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
26.
LowenthalA F (1986), “Persistent oligarchy and political change in Latin America”, Journal of Interamerican Studies and World AffairsVol 28, No 2/3, pages 1–23.
27.
MassiddaA L (2017), “Grassroots agency: participation and conflict in Buenos Aires shantytowns seen through the pilot plan for Villa 7 (1971–1975)”, Architecture_MPSVol 12, No 1.
MoroniSDe FrancoA (2024), “Spatial justice: a fundamental or derivative notion?”, City, Culture and SocietyVol 38, 100593.
30.
MoserC O (2010), Ordinary Families, Extraordinary Lives: Assets and Poverty Reduction in Guayaquil, 1978–2004, Brookings Institution Press, Washington DC.
31.
OsayimweseI (2024), “From postcolonial to decolonial architectural history”, in EgbersVKamleithnerCSezerÖSkedzuhn-SafirA (editors), Architectures of Colonialism, De Gruyter, Berlin, pages 17–42.
32.
Oviedo CastelnuovoS (2020), “Comité del Pueblo”, paper submitted for the course Human Settlements in Development, Master of Human Settlements, Department of Architecture, ICoU, KU Leuven.
33.
Oviedo CastelnuovoSBurbanoL (2024), “Pursuing an architecture by demand: opportunities, entanglements, and tensions in two DesignBuild projects in Ecuador and Mexico”, in Simone BaderV (editor), DesignBuild in Postcolonial Contexts: A Critical Interrogation, Sto Stiftung, Essen, pages 61–82.
34.
PazmiñoDGarzónFChalénGContrerasWBaqueroN (n.d.), “Alternativa de reforma”, Alternativa. Órgano de Difusión del Taller Universitario Popular de Arquitectura y UrbanismoNo 1.
35.
PazmiñoDGarzónFChalénGBaqueroN (1978), “Asentamientos populares organizados Guayaquil, Ecuador”, Alternativa. Órgano de Difusión del Taller Universitario Popular de Arquitectura y UrbanismoNo 2.
36.
PetrasJ (1974), The Political Economy of Modern Latin America, Monthly Review Press, New York.
37.
Rivera CusicanquiS (1987), “El potencial epistemológico y teórico de la historia oral: de la lógica instrumental a la descolonización de la historia”, Temas SocialesVol 11, pages 49–64.
38.
RodríguezAVillavicencioG (n.d.), “El problema de la vivienda en América Latina: el caso de Guayaquil”, in FernandoC (editor), El proceso urbano en Ecuador, Instituto Latinoamericano de Investigaciones Sociales, Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, Bonn.
39.
RojasMVillavicencioG (1988), El proceso urbano de Guayaquil 1870–1980, Corporación de Estudios Regionales, Guayaquil.
40.
RojasMVillavicencioGBeckerAChangL (1989), El mercado de suelo urbano y barrios populares en Guayaquil, Corporación de Estudios Regionales-Guayaquil (CERG), Ciudad Centro de Investigaciones, I D R G Guayaquil.
41.
Schellnack-KellyI (2024), “Accessing collective memory: the role of oral history in building an inclusive archives reflecting a people’s archives”, Collection and CurationVol 43, No 1, pages 24–29.
42.
StreuleMKaramanOSawyerLSchmidC (2020), “popular urbanization: conceptualizing urbanization processes beyond informality”, International Journal of Urban and Regional ResearchVol 44, pages 652–672.
