The shift towards renewable energy, crucial for addressing climate change and sustainability, requires more than technological innovation: it demands social acceptance and approval. This research focuses on social licence and community consent within energy transitions, using Taiwan and Iran as case studies to highlight how cultural, economic, and political factors influence these processes. The study employs mixed methods to examine how these contexts impact social acceptance and the granting of social licence. It concludes that strategies for obtaining social licence must be finely tuned to local contexts, necessitating ongoing stakeholder engagement, cultural sensitivity, and adaptive project management. Acknowledging the complexity and dynamic nature of social licence, the study offers actionable insights for policymakers, developers, and community leaders, emphasizing the importance of integrating community consent throughout project lifecycles. It also identifies potential barriers and opportunities in achieving a sustainable energy future that is economically viable, socially equitable, and environmentally responsible.
AggarwalP (2022), “Taiwan’s energy (in) security: challenges to growth and development”, Jadavpur Journal of International RelationsVol 26, No 1, pages 110–126.
2.
AzubuikeS INakanwagiSDikeS C (2022), “Utilizing sustainability assessment framework to obtain a social license to operate in renewable energy projects: the case of Murchison Hydropower project in Uganda”, in WoodGGórskiJMeteG (editors), The Palgrave Handbook of Social License to Operate and Energy Transitions, Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, pages 1–22.
3.
BickfordNSmithLBickfordSBiceM RRanglackD H (2017), “Evaluating the role of CSR and SLO in ecotourism: collaboration for economic and environmental sustainability of Arctic resources”, ResourcesVol 6, No 2, 21.
BriggsCAthertonAGillJLangdonRRutovitzJNagrathK (2022), “Building a ‘fair and fast’ energy transition? Renewable energy employment, skill shortages and social licence in regional areas”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy TransitionVol 2, 100039.
6.
BrymanA (2016), Social Research Methods, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
7.
CantareroM M V (2020), “Of renewable energy, energy democracy, and sustainable development: a roadmap to accelerate the energy transition in developing countries”, Energy Research & Social ScienceVol 70, 101716.
8.
ChenH-CLeeC-HSeekingsT B WNguyenL B (2025), “Assessing the public’s social acceptance of renewable energy management in Taiwan”, LandVol 14, No 1, 121.
9.
ChoiJKimJ JLeeJ (2024), “Public willingness to pay for mitigating local conflicts over the construction of renewable energy facilities: a contingent valuation study in South Korea”, Energy PolicyVol 185, 113930.
10.
DaudaS (2022), “Earning a social licence to operate (SLO): a conflicted praxis in sub-Saharan Africa’s mining landscape?”, The Extractive Industries and SocietyVol 11, 101141.
11.
EliaATaylorMGallachóirB ÓRoganF (2020), “Wind turbine cost reduction: a detailed bottom-up analysis of innovation drivers”, Energy PolicyVol 147, 111912.
12.
EthirajanVMangaiyarkarasiS P (2025), “An in-depth survey of latest progress in smart grids: paving the way for a sustainable future through renewable energy resources”, Journal of Electrical Systems and Information TechnologyVol 12, 9.
13.
GholamiMSadeghiZJalaee EsfandabadiS A MNejatiM (2025), “Economic and environmental effects of energy transition in Iran by 2050: a dynamic multi-regional computable general equilibrium model”, Iranian Journal of Economic StudiesVol 12, No 2, pages 551–584.
14.
HallNLaceyJCarr-CornishSDowdA-M (2015), “Social license to operate: understanding how a concept has been translated into practice in energy industries”, Journal of Cleaner ProductionVol 86, pages 301–310.
15.
HazratiM (2024), “Social acceptance for renewable energy technologies: the role of the energy justice framework”, in HeffronR Jde FontenelleL (editors), The Power of Energy Justice and the Social Contract. Just Transitions, Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
16.
HofstedeG (2001), Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations across Nations, 2nd edition, Sage, London.
17.
HurstBJohnstonK ALaneA B (2020), “Engaging for a social licence to operate (SLO)”, Public Relations ReviewVol 46, No 4, 101931.
18.
IgelandPSchroederLYahyaMOkhrinYSalah UddinG (2024), “The energy transition: the behavior of renewable energy stock during the times of energy security uncertainty”, Renewable EnergyVol 221, 119746.
19.
LangerKDeckerTMenradK (2017), “Public participation in wind energy projects located in Germany: which form of participation is the key to acceptance?”, Renewable EnergyVol 112, pages 63–73.
20.
LouwenAvan SarkW (2020), “Photovoltaic solar energy: technological learning in the transition to a low-carbon energy system”, in JungingerMLouwenA (editors), Conceptual Issues, Empirical Findings, and Use in Energy Modeling, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pages 65–86.
21.
MinadakisPVega-AraújoJ (2024), “Rethinking the social license to operate? A theoretical exploration of its synergies with social acceptance and energy justice for a just transition”, Energy Research & Social ScienceVol 113, 103552.
22.
MoffatKZhangA (2014), “The paths to social licence to operate: an integrative model explaining community acceptance of mining”, Resources PolicyVol 39, pages 61–70.
23.
MoffatKLaceyJZhangALeipoldS (2016), “The social licence to operate: a critical review”, Forestry: An International Journal of Forest ResearchVol 89, No 5, pages 477–488.
24.
MoosavianS M MValiAMousaviS H (2018), “Ecological vulnerability assessment of mining areas under operation: a case study of Tabas County”, Desert Ecosystem Engineering JournalVol 7, No 25, pages 45–60.
25.
OsmanA IChenLYangMMsigwaGFarghaliMFawzySRooneyD WYapP-S (2023), “Cost, environmental impact, and resilience of renewable energy under a changing climate: a review”, Environmental Chemistry LettersVol 20, No 5, pages 2607–2647.
26.
Palomo-VélezGContzenNPerlaviciuteGStegL (2023), “Trust in institutions and public acceptability of risky energy production: testing the causal relationships in the context of Groningen earthquakes”, Energy Research & Social ScienceVol 96, 102927.
27.
PangLLiuLZhouXHafeezMUllahSTayyab SohailM (2024), “How does natural resource depletion affect energy security risk? New insights from major energy-consuming countries”, Energy Strategy ReviewsVol 54, 101460.
PetersRBerlekampJKabiriCKaplinB ATocknerKZarflC (2024), “Sustainable pathways towards universal renewable electricity access in Africa”, Nature Reviews Earth & EnvironmentVol 5, pages 137–151.
30.
PourzakaryaMHracsB JAbdelmonemM G (2025), “Community, inclusivity and context: exploring the factors that shape cultural policy in Iran”, African Journal of Creative EconomyVol 2, No 1, a19.
31.
RajaoalisonHKnezDZamaniM A M (2022), “A multidisciplinary approach to evaluate the environmental impacts of hydrocarbon production in Khuzestan Province, Iran”, EnergiesVol 15, No 22, 8656.
32.
SharptonTLawrenceTHallM (2020), “Drivers and barriers to public acceptance of future energy sources and grid expansion in the United States”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy ReviewsVol 126, 109826.
SlotterbackC S (2010), “Public involvement in transportation project planning and design”, Journal of Architectural and Planning ResearchVol 27, No 2, pages 144–162.
35.
SolomonB DKrishnaK (2011), “The coming sustainable energy transition: history, strategies, and outlook”, Energy Policy Vol39, No 11, pages 7422–7431.
36.
StegLPerlaviciuteGvan der WerffE (2015), “Understanding the human dimensions of a sustainable energy transition”, Frontiers in PsychologyVol 6.
37.
SütterlinBSiegristM (2017), “Public acceptance of renewable energy technologies from an abstract versus concrete perspective and the positive imagery of solar power”, Energy PolicyVol 106, pages 356–366.
YiuL (2024), “A harmony-based approach to student diversity”, ECNU Review of EducationVol 7, No 3.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
