The study provides an advanced non-linear approach to assess the structural capacity of strengthened masonry buildings. The numerical approach aims to optimize the efficiency of strengthened systems made of inorganic matrix and synthetic fiber. The strengthening contribution was evaluated considering a non-linear stress-strain relationship of composite both under compression and in tension. Finally, the proposed approach was applied on a case study comparing the classical method with the proposed approach.
LatifiRHadzima-NyarkoMRaduD, et al. A brief overview on crack patterns, repair and strengthening of historical masonry structures. Materials2023; 16(5): 1882.
2.
GrillandaNValenteMMilaniG, et al. Advanced numerical strategies for seismic assessment of historical masonry aggregates. Eng Struct2020; 212: 110441.
3.
ProtaA.Fast and low impact retrofit using advanced materials for a diffused seismic risk mitigation. Lecture notes in civil engineering. Vol. 198 LNCE. Cham: Springer.
4.
ZahraTDorjiJThambooJ, et al. Behaviour of reinforced mortarless concrete masonry panels under axial compression: an experimental and analytical study. Constr Build Mater2023; 377: 131097.
5.
TürkmenSde VriesBTWijteSNM, et al. In-plane behaviour of clay brick masonry wallettes retrofitted with single-sided fabric-reinforced cementitious matrix and deep mounted carbon fibre strips. Bull Earthquake Eng2020; 18(2): 725–765.
6.
IervolinoIBaraschinoRSpillaturaA.Evolution of seismic reliability of code-conforming Italian buildings. J Earthquake Eng2023; 27(7): 1740–1768.
7.
IBC2018 Italian Building Code: Ministerial Decree 17 January 2018, Aggiornamento Delle Norme Tecniche delle Costruzioni; Ministry of Infrastructure and Transport: Rome, Italy; 2018.
8.
Circular No. 7 of January 21, 2019, published in Official Gazette No. 35/2019, regarding: Instructions for the application of the updated technical standards for constructions as per the Ministerial Decree of January 17, 2018.
9.
QuagliariniECarosiMLenciS.Novel sustainable masonry from ancient construction techniques by reusing waste modern tiles. Sustainability2023; 15(6); 5385.
10.
PulatsuBGencerFErdogmusE.Study of the effect of construction techniques on the seismic capacity of ancient dry-joint masonry towers through DEM. Eur J Environ Civil Eng2022; 26(9): 3913–3930.
11.
BhooshanSDell’EndiceARanaudoF, et al. Unreinforced concrete masonry for circular construction. Architect Intell2024; 3(1): 7.
12.
CrisciGRamagliaGLignolaGP, et al. Effects of the mortar matrix on the flexural capacity of masonry cross sections strengthened with FRCM materials. Appl Sci2020; 10(21): 7908.
13.
FabbrocinoFBelliazziSRamagliaG, et al. Masonry walls retrofitted with natural fibers under tsunami loads. Mater Struct2021; 54(3): 115.
14.
TürkmenSde VriesBTWijteSNM, et al. Quasi-static cyclic in-plane testing of masonry walls strengthened with a single-sided fabric-reinforced cementitious matrix overlay and flexible anchorage. J Build Pathol Rehabil2019; 4(1): 8.
15.
Garcia-RamondaLPelàLRocaP, et al. Cyclic shear-compression testing of brick masonry walls repaired and retrofitted with basalt textile reinforced mortar. Compos Struct2022; 283: 115068.
16.
de VitaMRotilioMMarchionniC, et al. Architectural Heritage Indoor comfort after retrofit works: the case study of S. Vito Church in L’Aquila, Italy. Sustainability2023; 15(10): 8239.
17.
MocerinoCLahmarAAzrourM, et al. Innovation and resilience in the redevelopment, restoration and digitalisation strategies of architectural heritage. Mater Res Proc2024; 40: 323–349.
18.
RomisFCapriliSSalvatoreW, et al. Seismic vulnerability assessment of Historical Urban Centres: the case study of Campi Alto Di Norcia, Italy. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spatial Inf Sci2020; XLIV-M-1-2020: 885–892.
19.
di Ruffia AMPB. Built cultural heritage and digital transition: the new role of data and artificial intelligence applications in administrative procedures. Commun Comput Inform Sci2023; 1889: 213–221.
20.
CristofaroMTTanganelliM.Knowledge-based investigation of seismic vulnerability assessment and compatible strengthening design of an existing masonry building. Appl Sci2023; 13(10): 6093.
21.
NajafgholipourMAMaheriMRLourençoPB.Capacity interaction in brick masonry under simultaneous in-plane and out-of-plane loads. Constr Build Mater2013; 38: 619–626.
22.
NajafgholipourMAMaheriMRLourençoPB.Definition of interaction curves for the in-plane and out-of-plane capacity in brick masonry walls. Constr Build Mater2014; 55: 168–182.
23.
ShipingYBoxueWChenxueZ, et al. Bond performance between textile reinforced concrete (TRC) and brick masonry under conventional environment. Structures2022; 36: 392–403.
24.
SneedLHVerreSOmbresL, et al. Flexural behavior RC beams strengthened and repaired with SRP composite. Eng Struct2022; 258: 114084.
25.
CascardiAVerreSOmbresL, et al. Carbon Fabric Reinforced Cementitious Mortar confinement of concrete cylinders: the matrix effect for multi-ply wrapping. Compos Struct2024; 332: 117919.
26.
LongoFCascardiALassandroP, et al. Energy and seismic drawbacks of masonry: a unified retrofitting solution. J Build Pathol Rehabil2021; 6(1): 31.
27.
CarloniCVerreSSneedLH, et al. Open issues on the investigation of PBO FRCM-Concrete debonding. Compos Struct2022; 299: 116062.
28.
PistolesiFBaldassiniMVolpeE, et al. Fast and interpretable prediction of seismic kinematics of flexible retaining walls in sand through explainable artificial intelligence. Comput Geotech2025; 179: 107007.
29.
OmbresLAielloMACascardiA, et al. Modeling of steel-reinforced grout composite system-to-concrete bond capacity using artificial neural networks. J Compos Constr2024; 28(5).
