This article highlights the design potentials of a recently proposed form-driven approach for bending-active tensile structures, in which the geometry of the actively bent elements can be directly defined without the recourse to a form-finding procedure. The approach is applied to the design of a lightweight sun-shading system that can be used to protect glazed building façades, and in which actively bent beams are restrained by pre-stressing strips. Other than structural requirements, the geometry of this hybrid structure is informed by functional and environmental considerations to prevent overheating and glare inside the building.
LienhardJ.Bending-active structures: form-finding strategies using elastic deformation in static and kinematic systems and the structural potentials therein. PhD Thesis, Universität Stuttgart, Stuttgart, 2014.
2.
LienhardJAlpermannHGengnagelC, et al. Active bending: a review on structures where bending is used as a self-formation process. Int J Space Struct2013; 28(3–4): 187–196.
3.
BoulicLSchwartzJ.Design strategies of hybrid bending-active systems based on graphic statics and a constrained force density method. J IASS2018; 59(4): 267–275.
4.
LienhardJSchleicherSPoppingaS, et al. Flectofin: a hingeless flapping mechanism inspired by nature. Bioinsp Biom2011; 6(4): 045001.
5.
KnippersJScheibleFOppeM, et al. Bio-inspired kinetic GFRP-façade for the thematic pavilion of the EXPO 2012 in Yeosu. In: Proceedings of the IASS-APCS symposium 2012, Seoul, Korea, 21–24 May 2012.
6.
LienhardJRiedererJJungjohannH, et al. Multifunctional adaptive facade at IBA 2013. In: Proceedings of the structural membranes 2013: VI international conference on textile composites and inflatable structures, Munich, 9–11 October 2013.
7.
KörnerABornLMaderA, et al. Flectofold: A biomimetic compliant shading device for complex free form facades. Smart Mater Struct2018; 27: 017001.
8.
De LaetLSlabbinckEVan MeleT, et al. Case study: a modular, self-tensioned, bending-active canopy. In: Proceedings of the IASS annual symposium 2013, Wroclaw, 23–27 September 2013.
9.
LienhardJKnippersJ.Permanent and convertible membrane structures with intricate bending-active support systems. In: Proceedings of the international IASS symposium 2012, Seoul, Korea, 21–24 May 2012.
10.
LienhardJAhlquistSMengesA, et al. Extending the functional and formal vocabulary of tensile membrane structures through the interaction with bending- active elements. In: Proceedings of the TensiNet symposium 2013, Istanbul, 8–10 May 2013.
11.
SchekH-J.The force density method for form finding and computation of general networks. Comput Method Appl1974; 3: 115–134.
12.
AdriaenssensSBarnesMR.Tensegrity spline beam and grid shell structures. Eng Struct2001; 23: 29–36.
13.
BarnesMRAdriaenssensSKrupkaM.A novel torsion / bending element for dynamic relaxation modeling. Comput Struct2013; 119: 60–67.
14.
Du PelouxLTayebFLefevreB, et al. Formulation of a 4-DoF torsion / bending element for the formfinding of elastic gridshells. In: Proceedings of the IASS annual symposium 2015, Amsterdam, 17–20 August 2015.
15.
D’AmicoBKermaniAZhangH.Form finding and structural analysis of actively bent timber grid shells. Eng Struct2014; 81: 195–207.
16.
Van MeleTDe LaetLVeenendaalD, et al. Shaping tension structures with actively bent linear elements. Int J Space Struct2013; 28(3–4): 127–135.
17.
LázaroCBessiniJMonleónS.Mechanical models in computational form finding of bending-active structures. Int J Space Struct2018; 33(2): 86–97.
QuinnGDeleuranAHPikerD, et al. Calibrated and interactive modelling of form-active hybrid structures. In: Proceedings of the IASS annual symposium 2016, Tokyo, Japan, 26–30 September 2016.
21.
BauerAMLängstPLa MagnaR, et al. Exploring software approaches for the design and simulation of bending active systems. In: Proceedings of the IASS symposium 2018, Boston, MA, 16–20 July 2018.
22.
NabaeiSSBaverelOWeinandY.Form-finding of interlaced space structures using constrained nonlinear optimization. Int J Space Struct2015; 30(3–4): 273–285.
23.
RomboutsJLombaertGDe LaetL, et al. On the equivalence of dynamic relaxation and the Newton-Raphson method. Int J Num Methods Eng2018; 113(9): 1531–1539.
24.
CuvilliersPMuellerC. A comparison of dynamic relaxation and generalist optimization methods for the simulation of bending-active structures. In: Proceedings of the IASS annual symposium 2018, Boston, MA, 16–20 July 2018.
25.
LienhardJLa MagnaRKnippersJ.Form-finding bending-active structures with temporary ultra-elastic contraction elements. WIT Trans Built Environ2014; 136: 107–116.
26.
BauerAMLängstPWüchnerR, et al. Isogeometric analysis for modeling and simulation of building processes. In: Proceedings of the IASS annual symposium 2017, Hamburg, 25–28 September 2017.
27.
NicholasPTamkeM. Composite territories: Engaging a bespoke material practice in digitally designed materials. In: Proceedings of the 30th ECAADe conference, vol. 2, Prague, 12–14 September 2012, pp. 681–690. http://papers.cumincad.org/cgi-bin/works/paper/ecaade2012_93
28.
TamkeMNicholasPRamsgaard ThomsenM, et al. Graded territories: towards the design, specification, and simulation of materially graded bending-active structures. In: Proceedings of the 32nd annual conference of the ACADIA, San Francisco, CA, 18–21 October 2012, pp. 79–86. http://papers.cumincad.org/cgi-bin/works/paper/acadia12_79
29.
BechertSKnippersJKriegOD, et al. Textile fabrication techniques for timber shells: elastic bending of custom-laminated veneer for segmented shell construction systems. In: AdriaenssensSGramazioFKohlerM, et al. (eds) Proceedings of advances in architectural geometry 2016. Zurich: VDF Hochschulverlag, 2016, pp. 154–169.
30.
BrüttingJKörnerASonntagD, et al. Bending-active segmented shells. In: Proceedings of the IASS annual symposium 2017, Hamburg, 25–28 September 2017.
31.
BoulicLSchwartzJ. Graphic statics principles for the design of actively bent elements shaped with restraining systems. In: Proceedings of the IASS annual symposium 2017, Hamburg, 25–28 September 2017.
Kotelnikova-WeilerNDoutheCLafuente HernandezE, et al. Materials for actively-bent structures. Int J Space Struct2013; 28(3): 229–240.
36.
WeinandYHudertM.Timber fabric: applying textile principles on a building scale. Archit Des2010; 80(4): 102–107.
37.
FleischmannMKnippersJLienhardJ, et al. Material behaviour: embedding physical properties in computational design processes. Archit Des2012; 82(2): 44–51.
38.
D’AcuntoPKotnikT.AA / ETH pavilion. In: Proceedings of the TensiNet symposium 2013, Tensinet Association, Istanbul, 6–8 May 2013. pp. 99–108.
39.
La MagnaRSchleicherSKnippersJ. Bending-active plates form and structure. In: AdriaenssensSGramazioFKohlerM, et al. (eds) Proceedings of advances in architectural geometry 2016. Zurich: VDF Hochschulverlag, 2016, pp. 170–186.
40.
BrancartSPopovic LarsenODe LaetL, et al. Rapidly assembled reciprocal systems with bending-active components: the ReciPlyDome. J IASS2019; 60(1): 65–77.
41.
TimoshenkoSPGereMJ.Theory of elastic stability. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1961
