Abstract
Those who urge governments to make plans for the consistent development and coordination of information provision face many practical difficulties, in particular, serious doubts among senior policy makers whether a national information policy can or should exist. Four main reasons for their attitudes are described and the implications for advocates of planning are discussed. A distinction is drawn between planning and coordination and the possible nature and functions of a national coordinating organization are described, with emphasis on stimulation and financial support of new activities as well as on coordination.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
