‘Adopt a book (2001) – a book is forever, not just for Christmas’. Managing Information, 8:10, December 2001, p. 18.
2.
‘America's Library a hit (2002); site for kids & families surpasses 300 million “hits”’. Library of Congress Information Bulletin, 61(6), June 2002, pp.110–111.
3.
AmirkhaniGholamreza (2002) ‘The National Library of Iran, past and present’. Alexandria, 14(2), 2002, pp.117–23.
4.
AnghelescuHerminaG. B. (2001) ‘The National Library of Romania's precursors: Early beginnings through the communist period’. Alexandria, 13(3), 2001, pp.165–176.
5.
AnghelescuHerminaG. B. (2002) ‘The National Library of Romania: From Central State Library of the People's Republic to National Library’. Alexandria, 14(1), 2002, pp.25–40.
6.
AnsorgeKathrin (2001) ‘Informationsplattform für alle Mitarbeiter. Intranetplanungen in Der Deutschen Bibliothek’. Buch und Bibliothek, 53(4), April 2001, pp.236–237.
ArsenaultClément (2001) ‘Word division in the transcription of Chinese script in the title fields of bibliographic records’. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 32(3), 2001, pp.109–137.
9.
‘Auburn U, NLNZ (2001) choose ENCompass’. Advanced Technology Libraries, 30(9), September 2001, p.4.
10.
BakerNicholson (2001) Double fold: Libraries and the assault on paper.New York: Random House, 2001.
11.
BalíkVojtěch (2000) ‘CASLIN, priorities of the Czech National Library, and government policy on information and libraries’, in: LassAndrewQuandtRichardE. (eds). Library automation in transitional societies: Lessons from Eastern Europe.New York: Oxford University Press, 2000, pp.120–133.
12.
BarronLucyA. (2001) ‘The core standard as a useful serial cataloguing tool at the Library of Congress’. Serials Review, 27(2), 2001, pp.22–36.
13.
BensonPamella (2001) ‘National Library and Information System Authority’. Country report to the Conference of Directors of National Libraries, Boston, 22 August 2001. (Unpublished).
14.
BerthonHilary (2002) ‘Nurturing our digital memory: Digital archiving and preservation at the National Library of Australia’. International Preservation News; a newsletter of the IFLA Core Activity on Preservation and Conservation, 27, August 2002, pp.4–7.
15.
BerthonHilaryThomasSusanWebbColin (2002) ‘Safekeeping: A cooperative approach to building a digital preservation resource’. D-Lib Magazine, 8(1), January 2002. http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january2002/berthon/01berthon.html (visited 10 December 2002).
16.
BideMarkRichardsonKim (2001–2) ‘The eBook and the national library’. Against the grain, 13(6), December-January 2001–2002, pp.30–34.
17.
BillingtonJamesH. (2001a) ‘Humanizing the Information Revolution’. IFLA Journal, 27, 5/6, 2001, pp.301–306.
18.
BillingtonJamesH. (2001b) ‘The Library of Congress and the widening horizons of democracy building’, in: KranichNancy (ed.). Libraries & democracy: The cornerstones of liberty.Chicago: American Library Association, 2001, pp.183–193.
19.
‘BL and Elsevier (2002) partnership agreement’. [British Library]Document Supply News, 73, March 2002, p.1.
BlakeChristopher (2002) [‘National Library of New Zealand.’](No title) Newsletter of the IFLA Section on National Libraries, June 2002, pp.55–56.
22.
‘The book's journey’. (2002) Quarto: Newsletter of the National Library of Scotland, 12, Summer 2002, pp.4–6.
23.
BorbinhaJosé Luis (2002) ‘A national virtual library’. Alexandria, 14(2), 2002, pp.94–99.
24.
BorbinhaJosé LuisFreireB, (2001) ‘Deposit collections of digital theses and dissertations’. Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie, 48(3–4), 2001, pp.217–224.
25.
BorghettiLivia (2001) ‘The Central National Library of Rome’. Country report presented to the Conference of Directors of National Libraries, Boston, 22 August 2001. (Unpublished).
26.
BrackeStowellMarianneGwamandaDiane (2002) ‘Mediated document delivery using the British Library's Inside’. Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery & Information Supply, 12(4), 2002, pp.5–13.
27.
Bremer-LaamanenMajlis (2002) ‘Digitisation and cultural heritage’. Helsinki University Library Bulletin, 2002, pp.23–26.
28.
BrettJill (2002) ‘Building constituencies at the Library of Congress’. Newsletter of the IFLA Section on National Libraries, June 2002, pp.53–55.
BrindleyLynne (2002) ‘The future of libraries and humanities research: New strategic directions for the British Library’. Libraries & Culture, 37(1), Winter 2002, pp.26–36.
31.
‘British Library champions (2001) reader rights’. Managing Information, 8:10, December 2001, p. 18.
32.
‘British Library New (2002) Strategic Directions Survey’. Managing Information, 9(2), March 2002, pp.8–11.
33.
BrushPeter (2000) ‘The Alexandrian Library as it once was’. American Libraries, 3(4), April 2000, p.74.
34.
BrygfjeldArneSvein (2002) ‘The National Library of Norway and the digital challenge’. Scandinavian Public Library Journal, 35(1), 2002, pp.14–17.
35.
BulavasVlados (2001) ‘National Library of Lithuania’. Country report to the Conference of Directors of National Libraries, Boston, 22 August 2001. (Unpublished).
36.
BurdenChristine (2001) ‘E-journals at the British Library: From selection to access’. Information Service & Use, 21(3–4), 2001, pp.117–121.
37.
CabannesVivianne (2002) ‘L'action culturelle comme coutil de promotion de la bibliothèque’. Newsletter of the IFLA Section on National Libraries, June 2002, pp.57–60.
38.
CamposMariaFernanda (2002) ‘The National Library of Portugal; an overview’. Alexandria, 14(2), 2002, pp.83–99.
39.
ChepesiukRon (2000) ‘Dream in the desert: Alexandria's Library rises again’. American Libraries, 3(4), April 2000, pp.70–74.
40.
CloarecThierryRenoultDaniel (2001) ‘La recherche à la Bibliothèque nationale de France’. Bulletin des Bibliothèques de France, 46(4), 2001, pp.57–63.
41.
ColeJohn (2001) ‘The Library of Congress and the democratic spirit’, in: KranichNancy (ed.). Libraries & democracy; the cornerstones of liberty.Chicago: American Library Association, 2001, pp.169–182.
42.
CollierMel (2001) ‘Etat de la recherche en bibliothéconomie et sciences de l'information au Royaume-Uni: Le grand bond en arrière’. Bulletin des Bibliothéques de France, 46(4), 2001, pp.50–56.
43.
‘Congress approves FY 2002 (2001) budget: Appropriations Bill gives Library $452 Million’. The Library of Congress Information Bulletin, 60(12), December 2001, pp.271 & 277.
44.
Czech Republic.Národni knihovna [National Library] (2002)‘Výroční zpráva 2001’. [Annual report]. Prague: National Library of the Czech Republic, 2002.
45.
DanskinAlan (2002) ‘Transition to MARC 21’. Catalogue and Index: Periodical of the Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals (CILIP) Cataloguing and Indexing Group, 145, Autumn 2002. pp.1–3.
46.
DentMargaret (2001) ‘Treasures from the world's great libraries exhibition’. National Library of Australia News, December 2001, pp.3–6.
47.
DiamondLucia (2001) ‘Library of Congress Religious Law Classification schedules: Elegant, flexible and user-friendly’. International Journal of Legal Information, 29(2). Summer 2001, pp.488–496.
48.
‘Digital collections (2001): British Library Newspapers Online’. Microform & Imaging Review, 30(4), Fall 2001, p.107.
49.
DukeRossalind (2002) ‘Prospects for remote access: The Jewish National and University Library’. Interlending & Document Supply, 30(4), 2002, pp.215–216.
50.
‘Dutch National Library (2002) to serve as Elsevier archive’. Information Retrieval & Library Automation, 38(4). September 2002, p.6.
51.
EkholmKai (2002) ‘The National Library of Finland – taking a leading role in the Knowledge Society’. Helsinki University Library Bulletin, 2002, pp. 7–8.
52.
FogarassyMiklós (2000) ‘Special role of the Hungarian National Library in the formation and management of consortia’, in: LassAndrewQuandtRichardE. (eds). Library automation in transitional societies: Lessons from Eastern Europe.New York: Oxford University Press, 2000, pp.420–426.
53.
FontanaAntonia Ida (2001) ‘The Central National Library of Florence’. Country report presented to the Conference of Directors of National Libraries, Boston, 22 August 2001. (Unpublished).
54.
FranksAnthonyR. D. (2001) ‘International participation in the Program for Cooperative Cataloguing: Present status’. International Cataloguing and Bibliographic Control, 30(2), April-June 2001, pp. 23–26.
FullertonJan (2002) ‘Revitalising libraries: The Australian experience’. Paper delivered at the Annual Conference of the Library and Information Association of South Africa (LIASA), Port Elizabeth, South Africa, 1 October 2002. (Unpublished).
57.
GabelGernotU. (2000) ‘Die “größste Bibliothek der Welt”: 200 Jahre Library of Congress’. Buch Bibliothek, 52(10/11), 2000, pp.642–645.
58.
GatenbyPam (2002a) ‘Digital continuity: The role of the National Library of Australia’. Australian Library Journal, 51(1), February 2002, pp.21–30.
59.
GatenbyPam (2002b) ‘National libraries – not for researchers only: How to market the content of national libraries’. Newsletter of the IFLA Section on National Libraries, June 2002, pp.43–47.
60.
GauderBrad (2002) ‘Reference cooperative expands with QuestionPoint’. OCLC Newsletter, October 2002, pp.4–7.
61.
GenoniPaul (2001) ‘Slouching towards Calvary: Where to the National Collection?’Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 32(2), April 2001, pp.69–81.
62.
GenoniPaul (2002) ‘Distributed National Collections: Concept and reality in two countries’. Alexandria, 14(2), 2002, pp.103–115.
63.
GërguriMehmet (2001) ‘National and University Library of Kosova’. Country report to the Conference of Directors of National Libraries, Boston, 22 August 2001. (Unpublished).
64.
GieseDiana (2002) ‘Opening up the collections: The digitisation project’. National Library of Australia News, March 2002, pp. 19–22.
65.
GilevskiPaskal (2001) ‘National and University Library “Klement Ohridski” – Skopje, Republic of Macedonia’. Country report to the Conference of Directors of National Libraries, Boston, 22 August 2001. (Unpublished).
66.
GodfreeStephen (2001) ‘Document supply and the small journals publisher: A case of legalized injustice’. Logos, 12(1), 2001, pp. 45–48.
67.
GottesmanLaura (2002) ‘Digital reference; bringing the reference desk to cyberspace’. The Library of Congress Information Bulletin, 61(3–4), March-April 2002, pp.56–57.
68.
‘Greater user focus (2001) promised’. The Library Association Record, 103(6), June 2001, p.319.
69.
HaapamäkiTuula (2000) ‘Preserving the nation's recorded musical heritage’. Helsinki University Library Bulletin, 2000, pp.35–36.
70.
HakalaJ. (2001) ‘The NEDLIB harvester’. Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie, 48(3–4), May-August 2001, pp.211–216.
71.
HakkarainenJuhani (2002) ‘The reform of the Legal Deposit Act in Finland’. Helsinki University Library Bulletin, 2002, pp.9–11.
72.
HäkliEsko (2000) ‘Creating the future of a National Library’. Helsinki University Library Bulletin, 2000, pp.5–11.
73.
HäkliEsko (2001) ‘Common approaches in advancing access to information: Experiences from Finland’. Varastokirjasto tiedottaa, 2/2001, pp.2–5.
74.
HäkliEsko (2002a) ‘The concept of a National Digital Library: A new paradigm?’ in: HäkliEskoOff the Record: Articles and Papers, 2. Helsinki: University Library, 2002, pp.69–83.
75.
HäkliEsko (2002b) ‘Neue Optionen und neue Partnerschaften: Was für eine Zukunft werden die Nationalbibliotheken haben?’ in: HäkliEskoOff the Record: Articles and Papers, 2. Helsinki: University Library, 2002, pp.209–226.
76.
HäkliEsko (2002c) ‘Die Rolle der Nationalbibliotheken in neuen Jahrhundert’, in: HäkliEskoOff the Record: Articles and Papers, 2. Helsinki: University Library, 2002, pp. 179–208.
77.
HäkliEsko (2002d) ‘Towards a National Digital Library’, in: HäkliEskoOff the Record: Articles and Papers, 2. Helsinki: University Library, 2002, pp.96–114.
78.
HayesAlleneLarsonCarolyn (2001) ‘Use of OCLC's CORC at the Library of Congress’. Electronic Journal Forum, 27(2), 2001, pp.41–48.
79.
HentiläSeppo (2002) ‘Helsinki University Library – a national cultural institution, and a resource for the University’. Helsinki University Library Bulletin, 2002, pp.4–6.
HuuhtanenRiita (2000) ‘The National Library as a shared resource’. Helsinki University Library Bulletin, 2000, pp.33–4.
82.
HyamsElspeth (2001) ‘Blurred boundaries, clear focus …’The Library Association Record, 103(10), October 2001, pp.612–615.
83.
IweJosephineI, (2001) ‘Linguistics and information processing: Provision of syntactic and semantic consistency in the language of Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) pertaining to literature and librarianship: A comparative analysis’. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 32(2), 2001, pp.107–126.
84.
JamesStuart (2001) ‘The Library: A sense of place’. Scottish Libraries, 15(5), 2001, pp.9–10, 12–13.
85.
JammersA. (2001) ‘Brauchen wir eine nationale Bestandserhaltungsstrategie?’Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin Preussischer Kulturbesitz Mitteilungen NF, 10(1), 2001, pp.56–61.
86.
JensdottirAnna (2001) ‘The audio-visual department of the National and University Library of Iceland: The first five years’. IASA Journal, 17, June 2001, pp.34–38.
87.
JezzardHelen (2001) ‘BL pulls out of training’. Information World Review, 175, December 2001, p.6.
88.
KalraH.P.S. (2001) ‘Efforts towards digitization of libraries in India: Problems and prospects’. International Information & Library Review, 33(2/3), June/September 2001, pp. 197–204.
89.
KeliYuanWeimingJiang (2001) ‘Strategic development of the National Library of China, 2001–2005’. Alexandria, 13(2), 2001, pp.125–130.
90.
KnutsenUnni (2002) ‘Changes in national bibliographies, 1996–2000’. Alexandria, 14(1), 2002, pp.3–11.
91.
KocsyA. (2001) ‘What can and should be done in order to make the 300-year old Hungarian press more widely known?’Könyvtári Figyelo, 47(2), 2001, pp.244–251.
92.
KuneneDikelediJ, (2001) ‘Swaziland National Library Service’. Country report to the Conference of Directors of National Libraries, Boston, 22 August 2001. (Unpublished).
93.
KurthMartin (2001) ‘An Interview with Barbara B Tillett’. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 32(3), 2001, pp.3–24.
94.
LaylandPenelope (2002) ‘Current and future directions’. (Penelope Layland talks to Jan Fullerton)National Library of Australia News, September 2002, pp.3–6.
95.
‘LC awards mass (2002) deacidification contract’. Advanced Technology Libraries, 31(2), February 2002, pp.9–10.
96.
LeadleyIan (2002) ‘40 years of Boston Spa – reminiscence and change’. Interlending & Document Supply, 30(4), 2002, pp.218–221.
97.
LineMauriceB. (2002) ‘A crisis of National Library Leadership’. Alexandria14(2), 2002, pp.59–60.
98.
LineMauriceB.UrquhartD. J. (2002) ‘Interlibrary services in the UK’. Interlending & Document Supply, 30(4), 2002, pp. 190–194.
99.
LorPeter (2000) ‘The creation of the National Library of South Africa: New opportunities for service to the nation’. Proceedings: 4th SCANUL-ECS Conference, Windhoek, July 2000, pp.48–52.
100.
LorPeterGeustynMelanie (2001) ‘The South African imprint: Bibliographic control and access’. Paper delivered at the International Conference on colonial and post-colonial cultures of the book, Grahamstown, 6–8 August, 2001. (Unpublished).
101.
LoubserJohan (2000) ‘National library and National Archives building for Namibia’. Proceedings: 4th SCANUL-ECS Conference, Windhoek, July 2000, pp.62–67.
102.
LoubserJohan (2001) ‘National Library of Namibia’. Country report to the Conference of Directors of National Libraries, Boston, 22 August 2001. (Unpublished).
103.
MasanesJ.LupoviciC. (2001) ‘Preservation metadata – the NEDLIB's proposal. Bibliothèque nationale de France’. Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie, 48(3–4), May-August 2001, pp.194–199.
104.
MatosAcostaEliades I. (2001) ‘Biblioteca Nacional “José Marti”’. Country report to the Conference of Directors of National Libraries, Boston, 22 August 2001. (Unpublished).
105.
McGowanIan (2002) ‘Public relations, marketing, profile raising’. Newsletter of the IFLA Section on National Libraries, June 2002, pp.40–42.
106.
MillarIan (2001) ‘Nouvelles orientations pour la British Library’. Bulletin des Bibliothèques de France, 46(6), 2001, pp.86–92.
107.
MincioDanielle (2002) ‘Sharing preservation and conservation in French-speaking Switzerland’. International Preservation News: A Newsletter of the IFLA Core Activity on Preservation and Conservation, 28, December 2002, pp.20–26.
108.
MissinghamRoxanne (2001) ‘Customer services in the National Library of Australia: Leading edge or dragging the chain?’The Australian Library Journal, 50(2), May 2001. pp. 147–155.
109.
MoreePerry (2002) ‘The marketing strategy of the Dutch National Library: Its necessities and consequences’. Newsletter of the IFLA Section on National Libraries, June 2002, pp.31–33.
110.
MuirAdrienne (2001) ‘Legal deposit and preservation of digital publications: A review of research and development activity’. Journal of Documentation, 57(5), September 2001, pp.652–682.
111.
MulindwaGertrudeK. (2000) ‘The computerization of the Botswana National Library Service’. Proceedings: 4th SCANUL-ECS Conference, Windhoek, July 2000. pp.75–81.
112.
National Library of Australia (2002a) Electronic information resources; strategies and action plan 2002–2003.Canberra: The National Library, 2002.
113.
National Library of Australia (2002b) 42nd Annual report: 2001–2002.Canberra: The National Library, 2002.
114.
‘National Library of China (2001) signs with Ex Libris’. Advanced Technology Libraries, 30(12), December 2001, p.2.
115.
National Library of Ireland (2001) Report of the Council of Trustees of the National Library of Ireland for the year ended 31 December 2000.Dublin: National Library of Ireland, 2001.
116.
National Library of Ireland (2002) Report of the Council of Trustees of the National Library of Ireland for the year ended 31 December 2001.Dublin: National Library of Ireland, 2002.
117.
National Library of Scotland (2002) Annual report 2001–2002.Edinburgh: National Library of Scotland, 2002.
118.
NaylorBernard (2001) ‘Le droit des usages: L'exemple du Royaume-Uni’. Bulletin d'Informations de l'Association des Bibliothécaires Français, 192 (3rd Quarter), 2001, pp.60–63.
119.
‘New British Library (2001) strategy announced’. Information Management Report, August 2001, pp. 11–13.
120.
‘New ejournal’ (2002). Managing Information, 9(8), October 2002, p.22.
121.
‘New Zealand: The Nation's (2002) government & the Nation's story go online’. Information Retrieval & Library Automation, 38(7), December 2002, pp. 1–2.
122.
‘News from the British Library: A single European (2001) library planned’. Program, 35(4), 2001, pp.369–372.
123.
NewtonCate (2002) ‘Bibliographic control in Scotland: Providing a specialised National Bibliography within a wider national context’. International Cataloguing and Bibliographic Control, 31(2), April/June 2002, pp. 23–25.
124.
NielsenErika (2002) ‘The National Library of Greenland’. Alexandria, 14(1), 2002, pp.13–16.
‘OCLC, LC to release (2002) QuestionPoint 1.0’. Advanced Technology Libraries, 31(4), April 2002, pp.1, 8–9.
127.
OsborneMick (2002) ‘How to market the content of the national libraries’. Newsletter of the IFLA Section on National Libraries, June 2002, pp.50–53.
128.
PavesiAnna (2001) ‘Non solo Nacional: Biblioteche al servizio della ricercar’. Biblioteche Oggi, 19(6), July-August 2001, pp.26–34.
129.
PedleyPaul (2002) ‘Archiving the web’. Managing Information, 9:5, June 2002, pp. 14–15.
130.
Poirier-BrècheVéronique (2001) ‘Stratégies de numérisation: Analyse comparative des programmes de la Bibliothèque nationale de France, et de la Bibliothèque nationale de Québec’. Bulletin des Bibliothèques de France, 46(6), 2001, pp.24–28.
131.
PolišenskýJiří (2002) ‘Floods in the Czech Republic and their impact on libraries’. International Preservation News: A Newsletter of the IFLA Core Activity on Preservation and Conservation, 28, December 2002, pp.4–8.
132.
‘Preparations underway (2001) for a single European library’. Information World Review, 171, July/August 2001, p.5.
133.
‘Preservation Resources (2001) to digitize national Library of New Zealand 19th century newspaper collection’. OCLC Newsletter, 251, May/June 2001, p.19.
134.
PříbramskáIva (2000) ‘The Aleph implementation at the National Library of the Czech Republic’, in: LassAndrewQuandtRichardE. (eds). Library automation in transitional societies: Lessons from Eastern Europe.New York: Oxford University Press, 2000, pp. 168–179.
135.
ProchaskaAlice (2002) ‘National collections, global collecting: The responsibilities of librarians as collectors’. Libraries & Culture, 37(1), Winter 2002, pp.72–76.
136.
ProkopIgorRakúsMilanSlížováDaniela (2000) ‘Realization of the CASLIN project in the Slovak National Library and its impact on the automation of libraries in Slovakia’, in: LassAndrewQuandtRichardE. (eds). Library automation in transitional societies: Lessons from Eastern Europe.New York: Oxford University Press, 2000, pp. 153–167.
137.
RamachandranRam (2002) ‘A new lease of life: Investing in a learning nation’. Newsletter of the IFLA Section on National Libraries, June 2002, pp.39–40.
138.
RitchieGabrielle (2002) ‘The culture of collecting: The National Library as a memory institution’. Paper delivered at ‘Heritage creation and research’ – a South African Historical Society Conference, Rand Afrikaans University, June 24–26, 2002. (Unpublished).
139.
Ruiz-PerezR. (2001) ‘Consequences of applying cataloguing codes for author entries to the Spanish National Library online catalogs’. Cataloging & Classification, 32(3), 2001, pp.31–55.
140.
RussellRoslyn (2001) ‘His island home: Sir George Grey's development of Kuwau Island’. National Library of Australia News, October 2001, pp.3–6.
SadowskaJadwiga (2000) ‘Automation in the National Library in Warsaw: From an in-house system to INNOPAC’, in: LassAndrewQuandtRichardE. (eds). Library automation in transitional societies: Lessons from Eastern Europe.New York: Oxford University press, 2000, pp. 104–112.
143.
SajoAndras (2001) ‘Az Orosz Allami Könyvtár a digitalization utan. A TACIS es az OREL program’. (The Russian State Library on the way to digitization. The TACIS and the OREL programmes). Könyvtári Figyelo, 47(3), 2001, pp.511–524.
144.
SakaiTakeshi (2001) ‘Russian State Library, Moscow’. [In Japanese]Toshokan Zasshi (The Library Journal), 95(10), October 2001, pp.798–800.
145.
Sandberg-FoxAnnM. (2001) ‘Report on the Library of Congress Conference on Bibliographic Control for the New Millennium: Confronting the Challenges of Networked Resources and the Web, held Nov.15–17, 2000, in Washington, DC’. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 32(20), 2001, pp.35–48.
146.
SansonJacqueline (2002) ‘5 Ans apres l'ouverture de la Bibliothèque état des lieux’. Chroniques de la Bibliothèque nationale de France, 17, Janvier-Février 2002, pp.2–3.
147.
SantucciNatalia (2002) ‘Is it really necessary to market national libraries?’Newsletter of the IFLA Section on National Libraries, June 2002, pp.28–31.
148.
SchwartzElisheva (2001) ‘Library of Congress Islamic and Jewish Law classification schedule’. International Journal of Legal Information, 29(2), Summer 2001, pp.497–500.
149.
SchwensUte (2002) ‘Die Deutsche Bibliothek – gesetzlicher Auftrag und elektronische Publikationen’. Zeitschrift fur Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie, 49(1), January/February 2002, pp.13–17.
150.
‘September 11 Web (2001) Archive: Library and partners announce digital project’. Library of Congress Information Bulletin, 60(10), October 2001, p.215.
151.
ShihotaT. (2001) ‘National Diet Library, its nature as the national library of Japan and its library services for the people: An historic view’. Toshokan-Kai (The Library World), 53(4), November 2001, pp.458–467.
152.
Singapore (2002) National Library Board. Unlimited: Annual report 2001/2002.Singapore: National Library Board, 2002.
153.
SmaleCarol (2002) ‘Document supply: Future trends and challenges for national libraries’. Report to the Conference of Directors of National Libraries (CDNL), Edinburgh, 21 August 2002. (Unpublished).
154.
SmithGeoffMilneRonald (2001) ‘Towards a national strategy for research support’. The Library Association Record, 103(7), July 2001, p.417–418.
155.
SmithI. A.VilksAndris (2001) ‘Latvias Nacionala Biblioteka: The National Library of Latvia’. Alexandria, 13(3), 2001, pp. 153–163.
156.
SteenbakkersJohanF. (2001) ‘NEDLIB guidelines for setting up a deposit system for electronic publications’. Zeitschrift fur Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie, 48(3–4), May-August 2001, pp.181–183.
157.
StudwellWilliamE. (2001) ‘Subject access from “if” LC to IFLA: The next logical progression’. Technicalities, 21(4), July/August 2001, p.5.
158.
SzaszKaroly (2001) ‘Kozkönyvtáraink s az egy orszagos könyvtár’. (Our public libraries and the one national library.)Könyvtári Figyelo, 47(3), 2001, pp.437–48. (Reprint of 1869 study).
159.
ThorhaugeJens (2001) ‘Een Deense visie op bibliotheekontwikkeling en heraanpassing’. Bibliotheek- en Archiefgids, 77(6), 2001, pp.34–37.
160.
TotomanovaAntonaeta (2001) ‘The Bulgarian National Bibliography: History, present state and perspective for development’. International Cataloguing and Bibliographic Control, 30(4), October/December 2001, pp.65–69.
161.
TraueJim (2001) ‘The National Library – again’. New Zealand Librarian, 49(5), September 2001, p.188–190.
162.
TsebeJohnK. (2001) ‘Regional association of African national and university librarians: A case of SCANUL-ECS – its future and sustainability’. Proceedings: 4th SCANUL-ECS Conference, Windhoek, July 2000. pp.82–87.
163.
TuddenhamAdrianCopelandPeterBewleyNigel (2001) ‘Recovering the sound from the Rivonia Trial’. IASA Journal, 17, June 2001, pp.10–17.
164.
TulkuVen'bleMynak R. (2001) ‘National Library of Bhutan’. Country report presented to the Conference of Directors of National Libraries, Boston, 22 August 2001. (Unpublished).
165.
‘The UK Audiovisual (2002) Archive strategy 2002/2003: A new strategy for the UK moving image and sound archives’. Managing Information, 9(9), November 2002, p.28.
166.
UngvaryRudolf (2001) ‘The thesaurus of the National Széchényi Library and the “Koztaurusz”’. Könyvtári Figyelo, 47(1), 2001, pp.11–40.
167.
ValmTiiu (2001) ‘National Library of Estonia’. Country report presented to the Conference of Directors of National Libraries, Boston, 22 August 2001. (Unpublished).
168.
Van BormJulien (2001) ‘Een toekomst voor de Koninklijke Bibliotheek Albert I’. Bibliotheek- en Archiefgids, 77(6), 2001, pp.16–23, 28–30.
169.
VanderpijpenWilly (2002) ‘Marketing policy and market segmentation’. Newsletter of the IFLA Section on National Libraries, June 2002, pp.48–49.
170.
Van DrimmelenWim (2001) ‘Een Koninklijke Bibliotheek in Den Haag’. Bibliotheek- en Archiefgids, 77(6), 2001, pp.31–33.
171.
VilksAndris (2002) ‘How to raise the profile for the national libraries’. Newsletter of the IFLA Section on National Libraries, June 2002, pp.34–39.
172.
VitielloGiuseppe (2001a) ‘National libraries: The concept and the practice, 1700–2000’. Alexandria, 13(3), 2001, pp.139–152.
173.
VitielloGiuseppi (2001b) ‘National libraries in the age of globalization’. Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie, 48(5), September/October 2001, pp.271–279.
174.
VoorbijHenk (2002) ‘Analyse van de uitleengegevens: Methodiek en casestudy’. Informatie Professional, 6(3), March 2002, pp. 13–17.
175.
WangMei-Yu (2001) ‘Document delivery services in UK’. (In Chinese)Bulletin of Library and Information Science, 36, February 2001, pp.63–70.
176.
WatsonBruce (2002) ‘Rising sun’. Smithsonian, April 2002, pp.78–88.
177.
WoodyardDeborah (2002) ‘Digital preservation at the British Library’. Library and Information Update, 1(2), May 2002, pp.36–38.
178.
YorkBarry (2002) ‘The Polish-Australian Oral History Project’. National Library of Australia News, July 2002, pp. 15–18.
179.
YoungSally (2002) ‘Political ephemera and the hip-pocket’. National Library of Australia News, June 2002, pp.7–10.