In case of extra-articular fractures, internal fixation is usually performed using implants such as Intramedullary nails (IMN), medial plates (MP), and lateral plates (LP). Recently, an innovative “sandwich” technique has been introduced for treating acetabular defects. The efficacy of such a technique to treat comminuted extra-articular distal femoral fractures has never been investigated. Therefore, the current study aims to compare the biomechanical performances of three implants, that is, medial plate, lateral plate, and IM nails, with and without the “sandwich” bone grafts. A CAD model of composite bone was used in the study. An extra-articular comminuted distal femoral fracture (2.5 cm) was virtually created in the intact femur using the Materialize 3-matics™ software. The fracture fixation was performed using three implant systems (IMN, MP, and LP) with and without bone graft. A tetrahedral volume mesh was generated, and simulations were performed corresponding to the loading condition of the single leg stance of a person. The use of “sandwich” bone grafts was observed to reduce implant stresses by 4.4%, 57.3%, and 66.2%, and displacements by 17.4%, 56.6%, and 59.7%, in the cases of IMN, MP, and LP, respectively. The Finite Element results showed that the IM nail provided the best results regarding the von Mises distribution, displacement of the implant bone assembly, displacement of the fracture fragments, and contact sliding. Furthermore, the use of Cerament®-filled bone grafts considerably reduced von Mises stresses in the implants and the displacements of the implant-bone assembly.
ShehovychASalarOMeyerC, et al. Adult distal radius fractures classification systems: essential clinical knowledge or abstract memory testing?Ann R Coll Surg Engl2016; 98(8): 525–531.
2.
ElsoeRCeccottiAALarsenP.Population-based epidemiology and incidence of distal femur fractures. Int Orthop2018; 42(1): 191–196.
3.
IlyasAMJupiterJB.Distal radius fractures-classification of treatment and indications for surgery. Hand Clin2010; 26(1): 37–42.
4.
MarshJLSlongoTFAgelJ, et al. Fracture and dislocation classification compendium - 2007: orthopaedic trauma association classification, database and outcomes committee. J Orthop Trauma2007; 21:p: S1–S6.
5.
EhlingerMAdamPAbaneL, et al. Minimally-invasive internal fixation of extra-articular distal femur fractures using a locking plate: tricks of the trade. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res2011; 97(2): 201–205.
6.
BeltranMJGaryJLCollingeCA.Management of distal femur fractures with modern plates and nails: state of the art. J Orthop Trauma2015; 29(4): 165–172.
7.
McNamaraIRRaymentABrooksR, et al. The effect of the addition of hydroxyapatite graft substitutes upon the hoop strain and subsequent subsidence of a femoral model during impaction bone grafting. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2012; 5(1): 238–246.
8.
NilssonMZhengMHTägilM.The composite of hydroxyapatite and calcium sulphate: a review of preclinical evaluation and clinical applications. Expert Rev Med Devices2013; 10(5): 675–684.
9.
LeeGCNelsonCLVirmaniS, et al. Management of periprosthetic femur fractures with severe bone loss using impaction bone grafting technique. J Arthroplasty2010; 25(3): 405–409.
10.
MalhotraRGautamDMukherjeeK, et al. Alternating layers of morselized allograft and injectable ceramic bone graft substitute in acetabular reconstruction: a novel ‘sandwich’ technique. Arthroplast Today2023; 22: 101164.
11.
BottlangMFitzpatrickDCSheerinD, et al. Dynamic fixation of distal femur fractures using far cortical locking screws: a prospective observational study. J Orthop Trauma2014; 28(4): 181–188.
12.
ZhangYZhangSWangS, et al. Long and short intramedullary nails for fixation of intertrochanteric femur fractures (OTA 31-A1, A2 and A3): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res2017; 103(5): 685–690.
13.
FiroozbakhshKBehzadiKDeCosterTA, et al. Mechanics of retrograde nail versus plate fixation for supracondylar femur fractures. J Orthop Trauma1995; 9(2): 152–157.
14.
BrzozowskiPInculetCSchemitschEH, et al. Biomechanical testing of a computationally optimized far cortical locking plate versus traditional implants for distal femur fracture repair. Clin Biomech2024; 117: 106296.
15.
ZhangJWeiYLiG, et al. Interfragmentary lag screw and locking plate combination in simple distal femoral fractures: a finite element analysis. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc2021; 55(1): 9–15.
16.
WongKWWuCDChienCS, et al. Patient-specific 3-dimensional printing titanium implant biomechanical evaluation for complex distal femoral open fracture reconstruction with segmental large bone defect: a nonlinear finite element analysis. Appl Sci2020; 10(12): 1–12.
17.
ShahIDSchlauchAMPhanL, et al. The effect of body weight on interfragmentary fracture strain in plate fixation of distal femur fractures: a finite element analysis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res2024; 110(6): 103868.
18.
LewisGSMischlerDWeeH, et al. Finite element analysis of fracture fixation. Curr Osteoporos Rep2021; 19(4): 403–416.
19.
FreitasAToledoJVJúniorFerreira Dos SantosA, et al. Biomechanical study of different internal fixations in Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture - a finite elements analysis. J Clin Orthop Trauma2021; 14: 145–150.
20.
FengXLinGFangCX, et al. Bone resorption triggered by high radial stress: the mechanism of screw loosening in plate fixation of long bone fractures. J Orthop Res2019; 37(7): 1498–1507.
21.
TaylorMPrendergastPJ.Four decades of finite element analysis of orthopaedic devices: where are we now and what are the opportunities?J Biomech2015; 48(5): 767–778.
22.
ZhouLLinJHuangA, et al. Modified cannulated screw fixation in the treatment of Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures: a biomechanical study. Clin Biomech2020; 74: 103–110.
23.
DuQWangD.Recent progress in robust and quality Delaunay mesh generation. J Comput Appl Math2006; 195(1-2): 8–23.
24.
LiJWangMZhouJ, et al. Finite element analysis of different screw constructs in the treatment of unstable femoral neck fractures. Injury2020; 51(4): 995–1003.
25.
TangGLiuSLWangDM, et al. Finite element analysis in femoral fixation with TA3 titanium compressioll plate. Adv Mater Res2013; 647: 16–19.
NagPChandaS.Biomechanical design prognosis of two extramedullary fixation devices for subtrochanteric femur fracture: a finite element study. Med Biol Eng Comput2021; 59(2): 271–285.
28.
NagPBorgohainBAhmedKA, et al. The influence of static load and sideways impact fall on extramedullary bone plates used to treat intertrochanteric femoral fracture: a preclinical strength assessment. Ann Biomed Eng2022; 50(12): 1923–1940.
29.
ChenSHChiangMCHungCH, et al. Finite element comparison of retrograde intramedullary nailing and locking plate fixation with/without an intramedullary allograft for distal femur fracture following total knee arthroplasty. Knee2014; 21(1): 224–231.
30.
BongMREgolKAKovalKJ, et al. Comparison of the LISS and a retrograde-inserted supracondylar intramedullary nail for fixation of a periprosthetic distal femur fracture proximal to a total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty2002; 17(7): 876–881.
31.
HuiskesRWeinansHvan RietbergenB.The relationship between stress shielding and bone resorption around total hip stems and the effects of flexible materials. Clin Orthop Relat Res1992; 274: 124–134.
PalBGuptaSNewAM.A numerical study of failure mechanisms in the cemented resurfaced femur: effects of interface characteristics and bone remodelling. Proc Inst Mech Eng H2009; 223(4): 471–484.
34.
GhoshRMukherjeeKGuptaS.Bone remodelling around uncemented metallic and ceramic acetabular components. Proc Inst Mech Eng H2013; 227: 490–502.
35.
MorrisseyRJNicholasT.Fatigue strength of Ti-6Al-4V at very long lives. Int J Fatigue2005; 27: 1608–1612.
36.
ClaesLEHeigeleCANeidlinger-WilkeC, et al. Effects of mechanical factors on the fracture healing process. Clin Orthop Relat Res1998; 355: S132–S147.
37.
ClaesLEHeigeleCA.Magnitudes of local stress and strain along bony surfaces predict the course and type of fracture healing. J Biomech1999; 32(3): 255–266.
38.
ClaesLAugatPSugerG, et al. Influence of size and stability of the osteotomy gap on the success of fracture healing. J Orthop Res1997; 15(4): 577–584.
39.
KaraeminogullariODemirorsHAtabekM, et al. Avascular necrosis and nonunion after osteosynthesis of femoral neck fractures: effect of fracture displacement and time to surgery. Adv Ther2004; 21(5): 335–342.
40.
KoabanSAlatassiRAlharbiS, et al. The relationship between femoral neck fracture in adult and avascular necrosis and nonunion: a retrospective study. Ann Med Surg2019; 39: 5–9.
41.
LinSShangJXingB, et al. Modified F configuration in the treatment of Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture: a finite element analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord2021; 22(1): 758.
42.
ChethanKNZuberMBhatN S, et al. Optimized trapezoidal-shaped hip implant for total hip arthroplasty using finite element analysis. Cogent Eng2020; 7(1): 1719575.
43.
SchileoETaddeiFCristofoliniL, et al. Subject-specific finite element models implementing a maximum principal strain criterion are able to estimate failure risk and fracture location on human femurs tested in vitro. J Biomech2008; 41(2): 356–367.
44.
FanRLiuJJiaZ.Biomechanical evaluation of different strain judging criteria on the prediction precision of cortical bone fracture simulation under compression. Front Bioeng Biotechnol2023; 11: 1168783.
45.
HadenCVCollinsPCHarlowDG.Yield strength prediction of titanium alloys. JOM2015; 67(6): 1357–1361.
46.
SamsamiSSaberiSSadighiS, et al. Comparison of three fixation methods for femoral neck fracture in young adults: experimental and numerical investigations. J Med Biol Eng2015; 35(5): 566–579.
47.
SchaeferTKSprossCStoffelKK, et al. Biomechanical properties of a posterior fully threaded positioning screw for cannulated screw fixation of displaced neck of femur fractures. Injury2015; 46(11): 2130–2133.
48.
ClaesLEWilkeHJAugatP, et al. Effect of dynamization on gap healing of diaphyseal fractures under external fixation. Clin Biomech1995; 10(5): 227–234.
49.
DudaGNEckert-HübnerKSokiranskiR, et al. Analysis of inter-fragmentary movement as a function of musculoskeletal loading conditions in sheep. J Biomech1998; 31(3): 201–210.
50.
AbdullahNAmmarullahMIMohd SalahaZF, et al. Bioinspired porous hip implants design: a systematic review of mechanical testing and additive manufacturing. RINENG2025; 25: 103708.
