As the field of prosthetics moves away from traditional subtractive manufacturing methods toward more sustainable, customizable approaches like 3D printing, this study examines how varying clearance values in cycloidal drives impact their vibrational behavior. Cycloidal drives known for their high torque density and low backlash, are gaining traction as key reduction components in robotic prostheses, where minimizing vibration is essential for ensuring smooth gait transitions, reducing user fatigue, and improving long-term prosthetic wear comfort. This study investigates the vibrational performance of 3D-printed cycloidal drives by evaluating different clearances to optimize vibrational performance in robotic prostheses applications, specifically in robotic knee joints. In this research, three clearance values (0.2, 0.3, and 0.5 mm) were tested on a benchtop using 3D-printed cycloidal drives. With the retrieved raw gyroscope data, a combination of ANOVA and time-frequency analyses was employed to evaluate their vibrational performance across different speeds and load conditions. The study revealed that the 0.2 mm clearance, while effective at higher speeds, exhibited greater variance, and concentrated vibrational energy at lower speeds, which could cause localized stress and wear. The 0.3 mm clearance emerged as the most balanced, with minimal variance, evenly distributed vibrational energy, and greater durability, making it ideal for high-precision applications like prosthetic joints. In contrast, the 0.5 mm clearance exhibited erratic behavior, with excessive vibration and mechanical noise, making it the least favorable option.
GoldfarbM.Consideration of powered prosthetic components as they relate to microprocessor knee systems. J Prosthet Orthot2013; 25: 65–75.
2.
SchmalzTBlumentrittSJaraschR.Energy expenditure and biomechanical characteristics of lower limb amputee gait: the influence of prosthetic alignment and different prosthetic components. Gait Posture2002; 16: 255–263.
3.
EleryTRezazadehSNeslerC, et al. Design and validation of a powered knee-ankle prosthesis with high-torque, low-impedance actuators. IEEE Trans Robot2020; 36: 1649–1668.
4.
TuckerMROlivierJPagelA, et al. Control strategies for active lower extremity prosthetics and orthotics: a review. J Neuroeng Rehabil2015; 12(1): 1.
FengYZhuJWangQ. Metabolic cost of level-ground walking with a robotic transtibial prosthesis combining push-off power and nonlinear damping behaviors: preliminary results. In: Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2016 IEEE 38th Annual International Conference of the 2016, 2016, pp.5063–5066. IEEE.
7.
FerrisAEAldridgeJMRábagoCA, et al. Evaluation of a powered ankle-foot prosthetic system during walking. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2012; 93: 1911–1918.
8.
El-SayedAMHamzaidNAAbu OsmanNA.Technology efficacy in active prosthetic knees for transfemoral amputees: A quantitative evaluation. Sci World J2014; 2014: 1–17.
9.
HuntGRHoodSGabertL, et al. Effect of increasing assistance from a powered prosthesis on weight-bearing symmetry, effort, and speed during stand-up in individuals with above-knee amputation. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng2023; 31: 11–21.
10.
HuntGHoodSLenziT.Stand-up, squat, Lunge, and walk with a robotic knee and ankle prosthesis under shared neural control. IEEE Open J Eng Med Biol2021; 2: 267–277.
11.
BhattSJoshiDRakeshPK, et al. Advances in additive manufacturing processes and their use for the fabrication of lower limb prosthetic devices. Expert Rev Med Devices2023; 20: 17–27.
12.
Reddy DumpaNBandariSRepkaMA. Novel gastroretentive floating pulsatile drug delivery system produced via hot-melt extrusion and fused deposition modeling 3D printing. Pharmaceutics2020; 12: 52.
13.
ShahrubudinNLeeTCRamlanR.An overview on 3D printing technology: technological, materials, and applications. Procedia Manuf2019; 35: 1286–1296.
14.
RomanovaAM.The impact of 3D printing on the medical devices and prosthetics market. Ekonomika I Upravlenie: Problemy, Resheniya2025; 3/9: 11–16.
15.
GambirasioGPesentiMPanzenbeckM, et al. A 3D-printed cycloidal drive actuator for compliant human-robot interaction: design and integration for a low-back exoskeleton. In: CAD’23, 2023. DOI: 10.14733/cadconfp.2023.41-45.
16.
BezziniRBassaniGAvizzanoCA, et al. Design and experimental evaluation of multiple 3D-printed reduction gearboxes for wearable exoskeletons. Robotics2024; 13: 168.
17.
GambirasioGPesentiMPanzenbeckM, et al. Design and integration of a Low-Back exoskeleton: a 3D-printed cycloidal drive actuator for flexible human-robot interaction. Comput Des Appl2024; 21(5): 791–806. DOI: 10.14733/cadaps.2024.791-806
18.
BarsomianCEswaranNBPPesentiM, et al. Dynamic characterization and control of a back-support exoskeleton 3D-printed cycloidal actuator. CIRP Ann2024; 73: 29–32.
19.
Al KouzbaryMAl KouzbaryHLiuJ, et al. Robotic knee prosthesis with cycloidal gear and four-bar mechanism optimized using particle swarm algorithm. Actuators2022; 11: 253.
20.
RoozingWRoozingG.3D-printable low-reduction cycloidal gearing for robotics. 2022. pp. 1929–1935. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).
21.
BermanB.3-D printing: the new industrial revolution. Bus Horiz2012; 55: 155–162.
22.
Cruz SanchezFLanzaSBoudaoudH, et al. Polymer recycling and additive manufacturing in an open source context : optimization of processes and methods. Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium-An Additive Manufacturing Conference, Austin, Texas, 2015.
23.
HäußlerMEckMRothauerD, et al. Closed-loop recycling of polyethylene-like materials. Nature2021; 590: 423–427.
24.
LiHZhaoWWuX, et al. 3D printing and solvent dissolution recycling of polylactide-lunar regolith composites by material extrusion approach. Polymers2020; 12: 1724.
25.
VoetVSDGuitJLoosK. Sustainable photopolymers in 3D printing: a review on biobased, biodegradable, and recyclable alternatives. Macromol Rapid Commun2021; 42: e2000475.
26.
ZhangBKowsariKSerjoueiA, et al. Reprocessable thermosets for sustainable three-dimensional printing. Nat Commun2018; 9: 1831.
ShakibaMRezvani GhomiEKhosraviF, et al. Nylon—a material introduction and overview for biomedical applications. Polym Adv Technol2021; 32: 3368–3383.
29.
GregoryDAFrickerATRMitrevP, et al. Additive manufacturing of polyhydroxyalkanoate-based blends using fused deposition modelling for the development of biomedical devices. J Funct Biomater2023; 14: 40.
30.
NadagoudaMNGinnMRastogiV.A review of 3D printing techniques for environmental applications. Curr Opin Chem Eng2020; 28: 173–178.
31.
JavaidMHaleemASinghRP, et al. Role of additive manufacturing applications towards environmental sustainability. Adv Ind Eng Polym Res2021; 4: 312–322.
32.
GeblerMSchoot UiterkampAJMVisserC.A global sustainability perspective on 3D printing technologies. Energy Policy2014; 74: 158–167.
33.
YadavARohruPBabbarA, et al. Fused filament fabrication: a state-of-the-art review of the technology, materials, properties and defects. Int J Interact Des Manuf2023; 17: 2867–2889.
34.
LiCLeeC-H.Surface durability study of 3D printed gears using two different materials. Mater Plast2023; 60: 66–75.
35.
RashidABHaqueMIslamSMM, et al. Nanotechnology-enhanced fiber-reinforced polymer composites: recent advancements on processing techniques and applications. Heliyon2024; 10: e24692.
36.
MaoKLiWHookeCJ, et al. Polymer gear surface thermal wear and its performance prediction. Tribol Int2010; 43: 433–439.
37.
KónyaGFiczereP.The effect of layer thickness and orientation of the workpiece on the micro- and macrogeometric properties and the machining time of the part during 3D printing. Period Polytechnica Mech Eng2023; 67: 143–150.
38.
TimoshkovPNUsachevaMNKhrulkovAV, et al. Prospects for the use of polymer composite materials in the manufacture of prostheses (review). Plasticheskie massy2021; 5–6: 40–43.
39.
ChiYLiaoQLongJ, et al. Demonstrating Berkeley humanoid lite: an open-source, accessible, and customizable 3D-printed humanoid robot. ArXiv 2025; abs/2504.17249. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2504.17249.
40.
YilmazS.Comprehensive analysis of 3D printed PA6.6 and fiber-reinforced variants: revealing mechanical properties and adhesive wear behavior. Polym Compos2024; 45: 1446–1460.
41.
WangYLiFSunZ, et al. Effect of fiber content on the preparation and mechanical properties of 3D printed short carbon fiber reinforced PA composites. Polymers2025; 17: 671. DOI: 10.3390/polym17050671
42.
BodaghiMSadooghiABakhshiM, et al. Glass fiber reinforced acrylonitrile butadiene styrene composite gears by FDM 3D printing. Adv Mater Interfaces2023; 10: 2300337. DOI: 10.1002/admi.202300337
43.
WangSYanXChangB, et al. Atomistic modeling of the effect of temperature on interfacial properties of 3D-printed continuous carbon fiber-reinforced polyamide 6 composite: from processing to loading. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2023; 15: 56454–56463.
44.
RibeiroDCiminoSRMayoAL, et al. 3D printing and amputation: a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol2021; 16: 221–240.
45.
Sakib-Uz-ZamanCKhondokerMAH. Polymer-based additive manufacturing for orthotic and prosthetic devices: industry outlook in Canada. Polymers2023; 15: 1506. DOI: 10.3390/polym15061506
BartkusEKColvinJMArbogastRE.Development of a novel lower limb prosthesis using low cost composite materials. J Reinforced Plast Compos1994; 13: 301–313.
48.
ZmindakMKacoMSapietovaA.Analysis of the contact stresses of spur gears manufactured by 3D printing from composite materials. MATEC Web Conf2022; 357: 06003.
49.
IizukaKTakesueN. Comparison of characteristics of internal planetary gear reducer with epitrochoid curve using metal and 3D printed parts. In: 2023 IEEE/SICE international symposium on system integration (SII), 17–20 January 2023, 2023, pp.1–6. IEEE.
50.
SatakeHTakesueN. Comparison of characteristics of cycloidal gear reducer using metal, plastic and 3D printed parts. In: 2024 IEEE/SICE international symposium on system integration (SII), 8–11 January 2024, 2024, pp.1531–1536. IEEE.
51.
SatakeHTakesueN. Comparison of characteristics of cycloidal gear reducer of 20 different combinations of metal and plastic parts. In: 2025 IEEE/SICE international symposium on system integration (SII), 21–24 January 2025, 2025, pp.309–314. IEEE.
52.
HarshaKMSeetharama RaoYJagannadha raoDVNJ. Comparison of wear behaviour of polymer spur gears using FDM process. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng2021; 1168: 012028.
53.
AshaAKannanSJayabalanV.Optimization of clearance variation in selective assembly for components with multiple characteristics. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2008; 38: 1026–1044.
54.
XuLXChenBKLiCY.Dynamic modelling and contact analysis of bearing-cycloid-pinwheel transmission mechanisms used in joint rotate vector reducers. Mech Mach Theory2019; 137: 432–458.
55.
JiangCWangHHanT, et al. Simulation and compensation of axial geometric errors for cycloidal gears based on form grinding. Math Probl Eng2022; 2022: 1–16.
56.
RenZ-YMaoS-MGuoW-C, et al. Tooth modification and dynamic performance of the cycloidal drive. Mech Syst Signal Process2017; 85: 857–866.
57.
WangHFangKLiJ, et al. Analysis and experimental study on vibration characteristics of the RV reducer. Adv Mech Eng2023; 15: 1–15. DOI: 10.1177/16878132231181328
GorlaCDavoliPRosaF, et al. Theoretical and experimental analysis of a cycloidal speed reducer. J Mech Des2008; 130: 112604. DOI: 10.1115/1.2978342
61.
PhamA-DAhnH-J.High Precision Reducers for industrial robots driving 4th Industrial Revolution: State of Arts, Analysis, design, performance evaluation and Perspective. Int J Precis Eng Manuf Technol2018; 5: 519–533.
62.
QiuZXueJ.Review of performance testing of high precision reducers for industrial robots. Measurement2021; 183: 109794.
63.
GarcíaPLCrispelSSaerensE, et al. Compact gearboxes for modern robotics: a review. Front Rob AI2020; 7: 103.
HsiehC-F.Dynamics analysis of cycloidal speed reducers with pinwheel and nonpinwheel designs. J Mech Des2014; 136: 091008. DOI: 10.1115/1.4027850
67.
ApparaoDJagannadha RajuMV.Design and analysis of spur gear manufactured by DMLS process. Mater Today Proc2021; 46: 149–153.
68.
LeeUHShepherdTKimS, et al. How to model brushless electric motors for the design of lightweight robotic systems. arXiv preprint, arXiv:231000080, 2023.
69.
LiangWQianZChenW, et al. Mechanisms and component design of prosthetic knees: a review from a biomechanical function perspective. Front Bioeng Biotechnol2022; 10: 950110.
70.
CohenL.The uncertainty principle for the short-time Fourier transform and wavelet transform. In: DebnathL (ed.) Wavelet transforms and time-frequency signal analysis. Birkhäuser Boston, 2001, pp.217–232.
71.
LiCAnQ. Harmonic detection algorithm based on Kaiser window. In: 2020 IEEE conference on telecommunications, optics and computer science (TOCS), 11–13 December 2020, pp.60–63. IEEE.
72.
Fan LinJXWangHWamgY.The quality comparison of audio time shift effects using different sub-bands window function and RBF classify. Met Min Ind2015; 7: 290–296.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
