The effects of vehicle-induced whole-body vibration on human body have received widespread attention, and investigations have found that vibrations would cause lumbar disorders of occupational drivers. Some investigations have revealed the harmful effects of vibrations on human body, but the studies about the effect of vibration applied to different body regions on lumbar spine are limited. In this study, a whole-body finite element model was used to predict the biomechanical response of lumbar spine under vibrations applied to the back of thoracic and lumbar regions, and the bottom of buttock regions, respectively. The results showed that vibrations applied to the thoracic region would cause more intense spine motions, but the vibration applied to the lumbar region would cause higher internal forces, which might cause more injuries. The stress of lumbar spine would tend to increase after superimposed vertical vibration, and this increase might even more significant when the superimposed vibrations applied to the thoracic and buttock regions.
BovenziMSchustMMenzelG, et al. Relationships of low back outcomes to internal spinal load: a prospective cohort study of professional drivers. Int Arch Occup Environ Health2015; 88: 487–499.
2.
SinghKJPaleiSKKarmakarNC.Role of contributing factors on health risks of whole-body vibration exposure of heavy equipment and vehicle operators: a critical review. J Vib Control2024; 30: 2338–2355.
3.
KasemsanAJosephLPaungmaliA, et al. Prevalence of musculoskeletal pain and associated disability among professional bus drivers: a cross-sectional study. Int Arch Occup Environ Health2021; 94: 1263–1270.
4.
SammondsGMFrayMMansfieldNJ.Effect of long term driving on driver discomfort and its relationship with seat fidgets and movements (SFMs). Appl Ergon2017; 58: 119–127.
5.
MansfieldNSammondsGNguyenL.Driver discomfort in vehicle seats - effect of changing road conditions and seat foam composition. Appl Ergon2015; 50: 153–159.
6.
MohammadiHGolbabaeiFDehghanSF, et al. Relationship between occupational exposure to whole-body vibration and noise with sex hormone levels: an empirical assessment in an automobile parts manufacturing plant. Toxicol Ind Health2021; 37: 377–390.
7.
WilderDGAleksievARMagnussonML, et al. Muscular response to sudden load: a tool to evaluate fatigue and rehabilitation. Spine1996; 21: 2628–2639.
8.
BurströmLNilssonTWahlströmJ.Whole-body vibration and the risk of low back pain and sciatica: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Arch Occup Environ Health2015; 88: 403–418.
9.
BovenziMBettaA.Low-back disorders in agricultural tractor drivers exposed to whole-body vibration and postural stress. Appl Ergon1994; 25: 231–241.
10.
BovenziMSchustMMauroM.An overview of low back pain and occupational exposures to whole-body vibration and mechanical shocks. Med Lav2017; 108: 419–433.
11.
ZhangCGuoLX.Effect of whole-body vibration at different frequencies on the lumbar spine: a finite element study based on a whole human body model. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine2022; 236: 1752–1761.
12.
MatsumotoYGriffinMJ.Dynamic response of the standing human body exposed to vertical vibration: influence of posture and vibration magnitude. J Sound Vib1998; 212: 85–107.
13.
KongWZGoelVK.Ability of the finite element models to predict response of the human spine to sinusoidal vertical vibration. Spine2003; 28: 1961–1967.
14.
FritzMSchäferK.Influence of the posture of the trunk on the spine forces during whole-body vibration. J Low Freq Noise Vib Active Control2011; 30: 277–290.
15.
RamakrishnaVAChamoliULarosaAG, et al. A biomechanical comparison of posterior fixation approaches in lumbar fusion using computed tomography based lumbosacral spine modelling. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine2023; 237: 243–253.
16.
ZhangCGuoLX.Analysis of lumbar spine injury with different back inclinations under whole-body vibration: a finite element study based on whole human body models. Int J Ind Ergon2023; 95: 103447.
17.
HambliRDe LeacyRVienneyC.Effect of a new transpedicular vertebral device for the treatment or prevention of vertebral compression fractures: a finite element study. Clin Biomech2023; 102: 105893.
18.
JiangWZhaoFRahmanWU, et al. Comparison of the effects of different artificial discs on hybrid surgery: a finite element analysis. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine2024; 238: 78–89.
19.
GrindleDPakWGuleyupogluB, et al. A detailed finite element model of a mid-sized male for the investigation of traffic pedestrian accidents. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine2021; 235: 300–313.
20.
GuoLXZhangC.Development and validation of a whole human body finite element model with detailed lumbar spine. World Neurosurg2022; 163: E579–E592.
21.
GuoL-XFanW.Impact of material properties of intervertebral disc on dynamic response of the human lumbar spine to vertical vibration: a finite element sensitivity study. Med Biol Eng Comput2019; 57: 221–229.
22.
KumaranYShahAKatragaddaA, et al. Iatrogenic muscle damage in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and adjacent segment degeneration: a comparative finite element analysis of open and minimally invasive surgeries. Eur Spine J2021; 30: 2622–2630.
23.
GuoL-XWangQ-D.Biomechanical analysis of a new bilateral pedicle screw fixator system based on topological optimization. Int J Precis Eng Manuf2020; 21: 1363–1374.
24.
GrujicicMPanduranganBArakereG, et al. Seat-cushion and soft-tissue material modeling and a finite element investigation of the seating comfort for passenger-vehicle occupants. Mater Des2009; 30: 4273–4285.
25.
RohlmannAZanderTBergmannG.Comparison of the biomechanical effects of posterior and anterior spine-stabilizing implants. Eur Spine J2005; 14: 445–453.
26.
LiuCQiuYGriffinMJ.Finite element modelling of human-seat interactions: vertical in-line and fore-and-aft cross-axis apparent mass when sitting on a rigid seat without backrest and exposed to vertical vibration. Ergonomics2015; 58: 1207–1219.
27.
BrockKKSharpeMBDawsonLA, et al. Accuracy of finite element model-based multi-organ deformable image registration. Med Phys2005; 32: 1647–1659.
28.
XuWXZengYDYeJT, et al. Study on virtual simulation method of driver seat comfort. In: 2nd international conference on frontiers of materials synthesis and processing (FMSP), Sanya, Peoples Republic of China, 10–11 November 2018.
29.
AmiriSNaserkhakiSParnianpourM.Effect of whole-body vibration and sitting configurations on lumbar spinal loads of vehicle occupants. Comput Biol Med2019; 107: 292–301.
30.
TowardMGRGriffinMJ. The transmission of vertical vibration through seats: influence of the characteristics of the human body. J Sound Vib2011; 330: 6526–6543.
31.
FanWGuoLX.Influence of different frequencies of axial cyclic loading on time-domain vibration response of the lumbar spine: a finite element study. Comput Biol Med2017; 86: 75–81.
32.
BazrgariBShirazi-AdlAKasraM.Seated whole body vibrations with high-magnitude accelerations–relative roles of inertia and muscle forces. J Biomech2008; 41: 2639–2646.
33.
MakhsousMHendrixRCrowtherZ, et al. Reducing whole-body vibration and musculoskeletal injury with a new car seat design. Ergonomics2005; 48: 1183–1199.
34.
KırbaşU.Investigation of the effects of whole-body vibration exposure on vehicle drivers when travelling over covered manholes embedded in public roadways. Int J Ind Ergon2022; 88: 103277.
35.
MirakhorloMKluftNShyrokauB, et al. Effects of seat back height and posture on 3D vibration transmission to pelvis, trunk and head. Int J Ind Ergon2022; 91: 103327.
36.
GuoLXTeoEC.Prediction of the modal characteristics of the human spine at resonant frequency using finite element models. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine2005; 219: 277–284.
37.
BaigHADormanDBBulkaBA, et al. Characterization of the frequency and muscle responses of the lumbar and thoracic spines of seated volunteers during sinusoidal whole body vibration. J Biomech Eng2014; 136: 101002.
38.
KimYEGoelVKWeinsteinJN, et al. Effect of disc degeneration at one level on the adjacent level in axial mode. Spine1991; 16: 331–335.
39.
WalshAJLotzJC.Biological response of the intervertebral disc to dynamic loading. J Biomech2004; 37: 329–337.
40.
AdamsMADolanPHuttonWC.The lumbar spine in backward bending. Spine1988; 13: 1019–1026.
41.
McNallyDSAdamsMAGoodshipAE.Can intervertebral disc prolapse be predicted by disc mechanics?Spine1993; 18: 1525–1530.
42.
ZengHZZhengLDXuML, et al. Biomechanical effect of age-related structural changes on cervical intervertebral disc: a finite element study. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine2022; 236: 1541–1551.
43.
HaywardSKeoghPSMilesAW, et al. The effect of structural changes on the low strain rate behaviour of the intervertebral disc. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine2024; 238: 851–864.
