Analysis of hip joint cross-shear under variable activities using a novel virtual joint model within Visual3D

Abstract

Cross-shear forces occur between bearing surfaces at the hip and have been identified as a key contributor to prosthesis wear. Understanding the variation in relative motion paths between both individuals and activities, is a possible explanation for increased revision rates for younger patients and could assist in improved pre-clinical testing regimes. Additionally, there is little information for the pre-clinical testing of cartilage substitution therapies for younger more active individuals. The calculation of motion paths has previously relied on computational modelling software which can be complex and time-consuming. The aim of this study was to determine whether the motion paths calculations could be integrated into gait analysis software to improve batch processing, reduce analysis time and ultimately improve the efficiency of the analysis of cross-shear variation for a broader range of activities. A novel Virtual Joint model was developed within Visual3D for calculating motion paths. This model was compared to previous computational methods and found to provide a competitive solution for cross shear analysis (accuracy <0.01 mm error between methods). The virtual hip model was subsequently applied to 13 common activities to investigate local aspect ratio’s, velocities and accelerations. Surprisingly walking produced the harshest cross shear motion paths in subjects. Within walking, of additional interest was that the localised change in acceleration for subjects was six times greater compared to the same point on an equivalent smoothed simulator cycle. The Virtual hip developed in Visual 3D provides a time saving technique for visualising and processing large data sets directly from motion files. The authors postulate that rather than focussing on a generalised smoothed cross-shear model that pre-clinical testing of more delicate structures should consider localised changes in acceleration as these may be more important in the assessment of cartilage substitutes sensitive to shear.

Keywords

Gait analysis hip biomechanics hip protheses hip simulators wear analysis/testing (biomechanics)tribology of materials

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ben-Shlomo

Blom

Boulton

, et al. The National Joint Registry 17th Annual Report 2020. reports.njrcentre.org.uk. London.

Ingham

Fisher

. The role of macrophages in osteolysis of total joint replacement. Biomaterials 2005; 26: 1271–1286.

Kurtz

Lau

Ong

, et al. Future young patient demand for primary and revision joint replacement: national projections from 2010 to 2030. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009; 467: 2606–2612.

Kang

Galvin

Brown

, et al. Quantification of the effect of cross-shear on the wear of conventional and highly cross-linked UHMWPE. J Biomech 2008; 41: 340–346.

Wang

. A unified theory of wear for ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene in multi-directional sliding. Wear 2001; 248: 38–47.

Budenberg

Redmond

White

, et al. Contact surface motion paths associated with leg length inequality following unilateral total hip replacement. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine 2012; 226: 968–974.

Turell

Wang

Bellare

. Quantification of the effect of cross-path motion on the wear rate of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. Wear 2003; 255: 1034–1039.

Bennett

Orr

Baker

. Movement loci of selected points on the femoral head for individual total hip arthroplasty patients using three-dimensional computer simulation. J Arthroplasty 2000; 15: 909–915.

Wang

Sun

Yau

, et al. Orientation softening in the deformation and wear of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. Wear 1997; 203: 230–241.

10.

Ramamurti

Bragdon

O’Connor

, et al. Loci of movement of selected points on the femoral head during normal gait: three-dimensional computer simulation. J Arthroplasty 1996; 11: 845–852.

11.

Schwenke

Wimmer

. Cross-shear in metal-onpolyethylene articulation of orthopaedic implants and its relationship to wear. Wear 2013; 301: 168–174.

12.

Wang

Essner

Polineni

, et al. Lubrication and wear of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene in total joint replacements. Tribol Int 1998; 31: 17–33.

13.

Wang

Polineni

Essner

, et al. The significance of nonlinear motion in the wear screening of orthopaedic implant materials. J Test Eval 1997; 25: 239–245.

14.

Wang

Stark

Dumbleton

. Mechanistic and morphological origins of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene wear debris in total joint replacement prostheses. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine 1996; 210: 141–155.

15.

Saikko

Calonius

. Slide track analysis of the relative motion between femoral head and acetabular cup in walking and in hip simulators. J Biomech 2002; 35: 455–464.

16.

Bennett

Orr

Beverland

, et al. The influence of shape and sliding distance of femoral head movement loci on the wear of acetabular cups in total hip arthroplasty. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine 2002; 216: 393–402.

17.

BS ISO 14242-1:2014+A1:2018: Implants for surgery - wear of total hip prostheses - Part 1: loading and displacement parameters for wear-testing machines and corresponding environmental conditions for tests. International Organization Standardization.

18.

C-Motion. Visual3D tutorials. 2018.

19.

Jan

SVS

. Color atlas of skeletal landmark definitions. Philadelphia, PA: Churchill Livingstone, Elsevier, 2007.

20.

Layton

Stewart

Harwood

, et al. Biomechanical analysis of walking gait when simulating the use of an Ilizarov external fixator. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine 2018; 232: 628–636.

21.

Bell

Pedersen

Brand

. A comparison of the accuracy of several hip center location prediction methods. J Biomech 1990; 23: 617–621.

22.

Bell

Brand

Pedersen

. Prediction of hip joint centre location from external landmarks. Hum Mov Sci 1989; 8: 3–16.

23.

Kainz

Carty

Modenese

, et al. Estimation of the hip joint centre in human motion analysis: a systematic review. Clin Biomech 2015; 30: 319–329.

24.

Barbour

PSM

Stone

Fisher

. A hip joint simulator study using simplified loading and motion cycles generating physiological wear paths and rates. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine 1999; 213: 445–467.

25.

Barnett

Redmond

White

Stone

Grainger

O Connor

Fisher

Stewart

T D

. Biomechanical analysis of leg length inequality following total hip replacement. Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society, March 2010, New Orleans, USA.

26.

Calonius

Saikko

. Slide track analysis of eight contemporary hip simulator designs. J Biomech 2002; 35: 1439–1450.

27.

Redmond

Jin

, et al. Hip contact forces in asymptomatic total hip replacement patients differ from normal healthy individuals: implications for preclinical testing. Clin Biomech 2014; 29: 747–751.

28.

Stewart

. Tribology of artificial joints. Orthop Trauma 2010; 24: 435–440.

29.

Liu

Fisher

Jin

. Effect of motion inputs on the wear prediction of artificial hip joints. Tribol Int 2013; 63: 105–114.

30.

Ruggiero

Sicilia

Affatato

. In Silico total hip replacement wear testing in the framework of ISO 14242-3 accounting for mixed elasto-hydrodynamic lubrication effects. Wear 2020; 460–461: 1–9.