Head-first compressive impacts occur in motorcycle crashes and may result in serious to fatal neck injuries to riders. Equipment to protect the riders’ necks from these injuries are available in the market; however, their effectiveness in reducing injury risk is not clear, either due to the lack of scientific evidences or assessment with any prevalently accepted standard. This paper presents a finite element ligamentous neck model, developed as a computationally efficient tool, for future use in the computational phase of assessment process of neck protective equipment. The 3D cervical spine was generated using the mean statistical dimensions of vertebrae and proposed constitutive models, provided in the scientific literature. Ligaments, for the vertebra-vertebra and Hybrid III head–vertebra ligamentous joints, were introduced with the aid of published anatomical descriptions. For validation, the response of the head-neck system under compressive loadings and the flexion-extension bending stiffness of the neck at the segment level were compared against experimental data. The advanced CORrelation and Analysis (CORA) algorithm was applied on the validation responses to assess biofidelity of the model. The results indicate that the model is functional and meets ISO/TR9790 standard as a “good” biofidelic model.
YoganandanNPintarFHaffnerM,et al. Epidemiology and injury biomechanics of motor vehicle related trauma to the human spine. SAE Trans1989; 98: 1790–1807.
2.
LeuchtPFischerKMuhrG,et al. Epidemiology of traumatic spine fractures. Injury2009; 40: 166–172.
3.
European Commission. Traffic safety basic facts on motorways. European Commission, Directorate General for Transport, June2017.
4.
ChinnBCanapleBDerlerSE,et al. COST 327 motorcycle safety helmets. Report, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 2001.
5.
SunJRojasABertrandP,et al. Investigation of motorcyclist cervical spine trauma using humos model. Traffic Inj Prev2012; 13: 519–528.
6.
MyersBSWinkelsteinBA. Epidemiology, classification, mechanism and tolerance of human cervical spine injury. Crit Rev Biomed Eng1995; 23: 307–409.
RichterMOtteDLehmannU,et al. Head injury mechanisms in helmet-protected motorcyclists: prospective multicenter study. J Trauma2001; 51: 949–958.
9.
Association of European Motorcycle Manufacturers. MAIDS in-depth investigation of accidents involving powered two wheelers. Final report 1.2, Brussels, 2004.
10.
DowdellBLongGJWardJ,et al. A Study of helmet damage and rider head/neck injuries for crash involved motorcyclists. Road Safety Bureau Research Note 5/88. Roads and Traffic Authority, New South Wales, Australia, 1988.
11.
KrantzKP. Head and neck injuries to motorcycle and moped riders-with special regard to the effect of protective helmets. Injury1985; 16: 253–258.
12.
CrandallJRBoseDFormanJ,et al. Human surrogates for injury biomechanics research. Clin Anat2011; 24: 362–371.
13.
KleinbergerM. Application of finite element techniques to the study of cervical spine mechanics. Stapp Car Crash J1993; 37: 261–272.
14.
DauvilliersFBendjellalFWeissM,et al. Development of a finite element model of the neck. SAE Trans1994; 103: 1645–1659.
15.
YangKHKishVL. Compressibility measurement of human intervertebral nucleus pulposus. J Biomech1988; 21: 865.
16.
DengBBegemanPCYangKH,et al. Kinematics of human cadaver cervical spine during low speed rear-end impacts. Stapp Car Crash J2000; 44: 171–188.
17.
HalldinPHBrolinKKleivenS,et al. Investigation of conditions that affect neck compression-flexion injuries using numerical techniques. Stapp Car Crash J2000; 44: 127–138.
18.
BrolinKHalldinP. Development of a finite element model of the upper cervical spine and a parameter study of ligament characteristics. Spine2004; 29: 376–385.
19.
BrolinKHalldinPLeijonhufvudI. The effect of muscle activation on neck response. Traffic Inj Prev2005; 6: 67–76.
20.
MeyerFBourdetNDeckC,et al. Human neck finite element model development and validation against original experimental data. Stapp Car Crash J2004; 48: 177–206.
21.
ZhangQHTeoECNgHW,et al. Finite element analysis of moment-rotation relationships for human cervical spine. J Biomech2006; 39: 189–193.
22.
PanzerMBFiceJBCroninDS. Cervical spine response in frontal crash. Med Eng Phys2011; 33: 1147–1159.
23.
ÖsthJBrolinKSvenssonMY,et al. A female ligamentous cervical spine finite element model validated for physiological loading. J Biomech Eng2016; 138: 061005.
24.
ÖsthJMendoza-VazquezMSatoF,et al. A female head–neck model for rear impact simulations. J Biomech2017; 51: 49–56.
25.
Van der HorstMJ. Human head neck response in frontal, lateral and rear end impact. PhD Thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology. The Netherlands, 2002.
26.
TNO. Madymo human body models manual release 7.6. Helmond, The Netherlands: TASS International, 2015.
27.
RobinS. Human model for safety - a joint effort towards the development of refined human-like car occupant models. In: 17th international technical conference on enhanced safety of vehicles, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 4–7 June 2001, Paper no. 297.
28.
IwamotoMKisanukiYWantanabeI,et al. Development of a finite element model of the Total Human Model for Safety (THUMS) and application to injury reconstruction. In: Conference of IRCOBI, Munich, Germany, 2002, pp.31–42.
29.
GayzikFSMorenoDPVavalleNA,et al. Development of the global human body models consortium mid-sized male full body model. In: 39th international workshop on human subjects for biomechanical research, NHTS Administration, US DOT, 2011.
30.
YoganandanNKumaresanSVooL,et al. Finite element applications in cervical spine modeling. Spine1996; 21: 1824–1834.
31.
NasimM. Neck protection development and a proposal of the associated standard for the motorcyclists. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Padova, Italy, 2018.
32.
MooreKLDalleyAF. Clinically oriented anatomy. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2006.
33.
FillerAG. Do you really need back surgery: a surgeon’s guide to neck and back pain and how to choose your treatment. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2004.
SengülGKadiogluH. Morphometric anatomy of the atlas and axis vertebrae. Turk Neurosurg2006; 16: 69–76.
36.
BazaldúaCJJGonzálezLAGomezSA,et al. Morphometric study of cervical vertebrae C3-C7 in a population from northeastern Mexico. Int J Morphol2011; 29: 325–330.
GrayH. Anatomy of the human body. Lea & Febiger - 1918, Philadelphia: Bartleby.com, 2000.
49.
YoganandanNKumaresanSPintarFA. Geometric and mechanical properties of human cervical spine ligaments. J Biomech Eng2000; 122: 623–629.
50.
PanjabiMMCriscoJJLydonC,et al. The mechanical properties of human alar and transverse ligaments at slow and fast extension rates. Clin Biomech1998; 13: 112–120.
51.
ChazelJTanguyABourgesM,et al. Biomechanical properties of spinal ligaments and a histological study of the supraspinal ligament in traction. J Biomech1985; 18: 167–176.
52.
YoganandanNKumaresanSPintarFA. Biomechanics of the cervical spine. Part 2. Cervical spine soft tissue responses and biomechanical modelling. Clin Biomech2001; 16: 1–27.
53.
HayashiK. Mechanical properties of soft tissues and arterial walls. In: HolzapfelGAOgdenRW (eds) Biomechanics of soft tissue in cardiovascular systems. International Centre for Mechanical Sciences (Courses and Lectures), vol. 441. Vienna: Springer, 2003.
54.
CamachoDLANightingaleRWRobinetteJJ,et al. Experimental flexibility measurements for the development of a computational head-neck model validated for near-vertex head impact. SAE Trans1997; 106: 3989–4002.
55.
NightingaleRWMcElhanejJHRichardsonWJ,et al. Experimental cervical spine injury: relating head motion, injury classification and injury mechanism. J Bone Joint Surg1996; 78: 412–421.
56.
NightingaleRWMcElhaneyJHCamachoDL,et al. The dynamic responses of the cervical spine: buckling, end conditions, and tolerance in compressive impacts. SAE Trans1997; 106: 3968–3988.
57.
BowdenFPTaborD. The friction and lubrications of solids. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1950.
58.
NightingaleRWWinkelsteinBAKnaubKE,et al. Comparative strengths and structural properties of the upper and lower cervical spine in flexion and extension. J Biomech2002; 35: 725–732.
59.
NightingaleRWChanceyVCOttavianoD,et al. Flexion and extension structural properties and strengths for male cervical spine segments. J Biomech2007; 40: 535–542.
60.
WheeldonJAPintarFAKnowlesSA,et al. Experimental flexion/extension data corridors for validation of finite element models of the young, normal cervical spine. J Biomech2006; 39: 375–380.
61.
GehreCGadesHWernickeP. Objective rating of signals using test and simulation responses. In: 21st international technical conference on enhanced safety of vehicles, Stuttgart, Germany, June 2009. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
62.
ThunetC. User’s manual of the CORAplus release (Version 4.0.4). Partnership for Dummy Technology and Biomechanics (PDB), Germany, 2017.
63.
MyersBSMcElhaneyJHRichardsonWJ,et al. The influence of end condition on human cervical spine injury. SAE Trans1991; 100: 2040–2048.
64.
NelsonTSCriptonPA. A new biofidelic sagittal plane surrogate neck for head-first impacts. Traffic Inj Prev2010; 11: 309–319.
65.
ToomeyDEYangKHVan EeCA. The hybrid III upper and lower neck response in compressive loading scenarios with known human injury outcomes. Traffic Inj Prev2014; 15: 223–230.
66.
GoreDRSepicSBGardnerGM. Roentgenographic findings of the cervical spine in asymptomatic people. Spine1986; 11: 521–524.
67.
WalkerLHarrisEPontiusU. Mass, volume, center of mass, and mass moment of inertia of head and head and neck of human body. Stapp Car Crash J1973; 17: 525–537.
68.
BurkhartTAAndrewsDMDunningCE. Finite element mesh quality, energy balance and validation methods: a review with recommendations associated with the modeling of bone tissue. J Biomech2013; 46: 1477–1488.
69.
TsukermanIPlaksA. Comparison of accuracy criteria for approximation of conservative fields on tetrahedral. IEEE Trans Magn1998; 34: 3252–3255.
PanjabiMMMiuraTCriptonPA,et al. Development of a system for in vitro neck muscle force replication in whole cervical spine experiments. Spine2001; 26: 2214–2219.
72.
NightingaleRWSgangaJCutcliffeH,et al. Impact responses of the cervical spine: a computational study of the effects of muscle activity, torso constraint, and pre-flexion. J Biomech2016; 49: 558–564.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
