Atrial fibrillation is the most significant contributor to thrombus formation within the heart and is responsible for 45% of all cardio embolic strokes, which account for approximately 15% of acute ischemic strokes cases worldwide. Atrial fibrillation can result in a reduction of normal cardiac output and cycle length of up to 30% and 40%, respectively. A total of 240 embolus analogues were released into a thin-walled, patient-specific aortic arch under normal (60 embolus analogues) and varying atrial fibrillation (180 embolus analogues) pulsatile flow conditions. Under healthy flow conditions (n = 60), the embolus analogues tended to follow the flow rate split through each outlet vessel. There was an increase in clot trajectories along the common carotid arteries under atrial fibrillation flow conditions. A shorter pulse period (0.3 s) displayed the highest percentage of clots travelling to the brain (24%), with a greater percentage of clots travelling through the left common carotid artery (17%). This study provides an experimental insight into the effect varying cardiac output and cycle length can have on the trajectory of a cardiac source blood clots travelling to the cerebral vasculature and possibly causing a stroke.
ClarkDMPlumbVJEpsteinAE, et al. Hemodynamic effects of an irregular sequence of ventricular cycle lengths during atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol1997; 30: 1039–1045.
3.
Kelly-HayesM.Influence of age and health behaviors on stroke risk: lessons from longitudinal studies. J Am Geriatr Soc2010; 58: 325–328.
4.
FusterVRydenLECannomDS, et al. Guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation. Circulation2006; 114: 257–354.
5.
HeeringaJVan der KuipDAHofmanA, et al. Prevalence, incidence and lifetime risk of atrial fibrillation: the Rotterdam study. Eur Heart J2006; 27: 949–953.
6.
MenkeJLüthjeLKastrupA, et al. Thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol2010; 105: 502–510.
7.
WolfPAAbbottRDKannelWB.Atrial fibrillation as an independent risk factor for stroke: the Framingham study. Stroke1991; 22(8): 983–988.
8.
PhillipsSJ.Is atrial fibrillation an independent risk factor for stroke?Can J Neurol Sci1990; 17: 163–168.
9.
ChesebroJHFusterVHalperinJL.Atrial fibrillation: risk marker for stroke. N Engl J Med1990; 323: 1556–1558.
10.
NathanakumarKKayGN.The deleterious effects of an irregular RR interval. Eur Heart J2002; 23: 695–696.
11.
PopovicZBMowreyKAZhangY, et al. Slow rate during AF improves ventricular performance by reducing sensitivity to cycle length irregularity. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol2002; 283: H2706–H2713.
12.
BushiDGradYEinavS, et al. Hemodynamic evaluation of embolic trajectory in an arterial bifurcation: an in vitro experimental model. Stroke2005; 36: 2696–2700.
13.
ChungEMLHagueJPChanrionMA, et al. Embolus trajectory through a physical replica of the major cerebral arteries. Stroke2010; 41: 647–652.
14.
FahyPMaloneFMcCarthyE, et al. An in vitro evaluation of emboli trajectories within a three-dimensional physical model of the circle of Willis under cerebral blood flow conditions. Ann Biomed Eng2015; 43(9): 2265–2278.
15.
MaloneFMcCarthyEDelassusP, et al. Investigation of the hemodynamics influencing emboli trajectories through a patient-specific aortic arch model. Stroke2019; 50: 1531–1538.
16.
MaloneFMcCarthyEDelassusP, et al. Embolus analog trajectory paths under physiological flowrates through patient-specific aortic arch models. J Biomech Eng2019; 141(10): 101007.
17.
ChuehJKWakhlooAKHendricksGH, et al. Mechanical characterisation of thromboemboli in acute ischemic stroke and laboratory embolus analogs. Am J Neuroradiol2011; 32: 1237–1244.
18.
CarrIANemotoNSchwartzRS, et al. Size-dependent predilections of cardiogenic embolic transport. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol2013; 305(5): H732–H739.
19.
ChoiHWNaviaJAKassabGS.Stroke propensity is increased under atrial fibrillation hemodynamics: a simulation study. PLoS ONE2013; 8: e73485.
20.
OuPCelermajerDSMousseauxE, et al. Vascular remodeling after ‘successful’ repair of coarctation: impact of aortic arch geometry. J Am Coll Cardiol2007; 49(8): 883–890.
21.
DemertzisSHurniSStalderM, et al. Aortic arch morphometry in living humans. J Anat2010; 217(5): 588–596.
22.
FahyPMcCarthyPSultanS, et al. An experimental investigation of the hemodynamic variations due to aplastic vessels within three-dimensional phantom models of the circle of Willis. Ann Biomed Eng2013; 42(1): 123–138.
23.
RaghavanMLKratzbergJCastro de TolosaEM, et al. Regional distribution of wall thickness and failure properties of human abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Biomech2006; 39(16): 3010–3016.
24.
ThubrikarMLabrosseMRRobicsekF, et al. Mechanical properties of abdominal aortic aneurysm wall. J Med Eng Technol2000; 25: 133–142.
25.
Di MartinoESBohraAVande GeestJP, et al. Biomechanical properties of ruptured versus electively repaired abdominal aortic aneurysm wall tissue. J Vasc Surg2006; 43: 570–576.
26.
MaloneFMacCarthyEDelassusP, et al. The mechanical characterisation of bovine embolus analogues under various loading conditions. Cardiovasc Eng Technol2018; 9: 489–502.
27.
O’LearySADoyleBJMcGloughlinTM.Comparison of methods used to measure the thickness of soft tissues and their influence on the evaluation of tensile stress. J Biomech2013; 46(11): 1955–1960.
28.
ReymondPMerendaFPerrenF, et al. Validation of a one-dimensional model of the systemic arterial tree. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol2009; 297: H208–H222.
29.
DaoudEGWeissRBahuM, et al. Effect of an irregular ventricular rhythm on cardiac output. Am J Cardiol1996; 78: 1433–1436.
30.
LeeDCMarklMNgJ, et al. Three-dimensional left atrial blood flow characteristics in patients with atrial fibrillation assessed by 4D flow CMR. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging2016; 17(11): 1259–1268.
31.
ZamirM.The physics of pulsatile flow. 1st ed. New York: Springer-Verlag Inc., 2000.
32.
CohenJ.Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988.
33.
UflackerR.Atlas of vascular anatomy: an angiographic approach. 2nd ed.Charleston, SC: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2007.
34.
DavieEWFujikawaK.Basic mechanisms in blood coagulation. Annu Rev Biochem1975; 44: 799–829.
35.
DuffySFarrellMMcArdleK, et al. Novel methodology to replicate clot analogs with diverse composition in acute ischemic stroke. J Neurointerv Surg2016; 9: 486–491.
36.
RobinsonRAHerbertsonLHSarkar DasS, et al. Limitations of using synthetic blood clots for measuring in vitro clot capture efficiency of inferior vena cava filters. Med Devices2013; 6: 49–57.
37.
KrasokhaNTheisenWReeseS, et al. Mechanical properties of blood clots – a new test method. Materialwiss Werkst2010; 41: 1019–1024.
38.
SchmittCHenniAHCloutierG.Characterization of blood clot viscoelasticity by dynamic ultrasound elastography and modeling of the rheological behaviour. J Biomech2011; 44: 622–629.
39.
StoneWH.The relation of human and cattle blood groups. Transfusion1962; 2(3): 172–177.
40.
WangDHMakarounMWebsterMW, et al. Mechanical properties and microstructure of intraluminal thrombus from abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Biomech Eng2001; 123(6): 536–539.
41.
MeyerJSCharneyJZRiveraVM, et al. Cerebral embolization: prospective clinical analysis of 42 cases. Stroke1971; 2(6): 541–554.
42.
MukherjeeDJaniNDSelvaganesanK, et al. Computational assessment of the relation between embolism source and embolus distribution to the circle of Willis for improved understanding of stroke etiology. ASME J Biomech Eng2016; 138(8): 081008.
43.
ParkKYKimYBChungPW, et al. Right-side propensity of cardiogenic emboli in acute ischemic stroke with atrial fibrillation. Scand Cardiovasc J2014; 48(6): 335–338.
44.
GoldMKhamesiMSivakumaM, et al. Right-left propensity of cardiogenic cerebral embolism in standard versus bovine aortic arch variant. Clin Anat2018; 31(3): 310–313.
45.
HednaWSBodhitANAnsariS, et al. Hemispheric differences in ischemic stroke: is left hemisphere stroke more common?J Clin Neurol2013; 9(2): 97–102.
46.
Rodriguez HernandezSKroonAAvan boztelMPJ, et al. Is there side predilection for cerebrovascular disease?Hypertension2003; 42(1): 56–60.
47.
PatelNHorsfieldMABanahanC, et al. Impact of perioperative infarcts after cardiac surgery. Stroke2015; 46(3): 680–686.
48.
LearyMCCaplanLR.Carioembolic stroke: an update on etiology, diagnosis and management. Ann Indian Acad Neurol2008; 11: 52–63.
49.
BogousslavskyJVan MelleGRegliF, et al. Pathogenesis of anterior circulation stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: the Lausanne Stroke Registry. Neurology1990; 40: 1046–1050.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
