Cortical bone fracture mechanisms are well studied under quasi-static loading. The influence of strain rate on crack propagation mechanisms needs to be better understood, however. We have previously shown that several aspects of the bone micro-structure are involved in crack propagation, such as the complete porosity network, including the Haversian system and the lacunar network, as well as biochemical aspects, such as the maturity of collagen cross-links. The aim of this study is to investigate the influence of strain rate on the toughness of human cortical bone with respect to its microstructure and organic non-collagenous composition. Two strain rates will be considered: quasi-static loading (10−4 s−1), a standard condition, and a higher loading rate (10−1 s−1), representative of a fall. Cortical bone samples were extracted from eight female donors (age 50–91 years). Three-point bending tests were performed until failure. Synchrotron radiation micro-computed tomography imaging was performed to assess bone microstructure including the Haversian system and the lacunar system. Collagen enzymatic cross-link maturation was measured using a high performance liquid chromatography column. Results showed that that under quasi-static loading, the elastic contribution of the fracture process is correlated to both the collagen cross-links maturation and the microstructure, while the plastic contribution is correlated only to the porosity network. Under fall-like loading, bone organization appears to be less linked to crack propagation.
SirisESChenY-TAbbottT, et al. Bone mineral density thresholds for pharmacological intervention to prevent fractures. Arch Intern Med2004; 164: 1108–1112.
2.
SirisESAdlerRBilezikianJ, et al. The clinical diagnosis of osteoporosis: a position statement from the National Bone Health Alliance Working Group. Osteoporos Int2014; 25: 1439–1443.
3.
JohnellOKanisJA. An estimate of the worldwide prevalence, mortality and disability associated with hip fracture. Osteoporos Int2006; 15: 897–902.
4.
GenantHKEngelkeKFuerstT, et al. Noninvasive assessment of bone mineral and structure: state of the art. J Bone Miner Res1996; 11: 707–730.
5.
WachterNJAugatPKrischakGD, et al. Prediction of cortical bone porosity in vitro by microcomputed tomography. Calcif Tissue Int2001; 68: 38–42.
6.
Van RietbergenBItoK. A survey of micro-finite element analysis for clinical assessment of bone strength: the first decade. J Biomech2015; 48: 832–841.
7.
SeemanEDelmasPD. Bone quality: the material and structural basis of bone strength and fragility. N Engl J Med2006; 354: 2250–2261.
8.
YeniYNBrownCUGruenTA, et al. The relationships between femoral cortex geometry and tissue mechanical properties. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2013; 21: 9–16.
9.
RitchieRO. Mechanisms of fatigue crack propagation in metals, ceramics and composites: role of crack tip shielding. Mater Sci Eng A1988; 103: 15–28.
10.
NallaRKKruzicJJRitchieRO. On the origin of the toughness of mineralized tissue: microcracking or crack bridging?Bone2004; 34: 790–798.
11.
ZimmermannEASchaibleEBaleH, et al. Age-related changes in the plasticity and toughness of human cortical bone at multiple length scales. Proc Natl Acad Sci2011; 108: 14416–14421.
12.
GuptaHSKraussSKerschnitzkiM, et al. Intrafibrillar plasticity through mineral/collagen sliding is the dominant mechanism for the extreme toughness of antler bone. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2013; 28: 366–382.
13.
TangSYVashishthD. Non-enzymatic glycation alters microdamage formation in human cancellous bone. Bone2010; 46: 148–154.
14.
ZiouposPHansenUCurreyJD. Microcracking damage and the fracture process in relation to strain rate in human cortical bone tensile failure. J Biomech2008; 41: 2932–2939.
15.
O’BrienFJTaylorDLeeTC. The effect of bone microstructure on the initiaton and growth of microcracks. J Orthop Res2005; 23: 475–480.
16.
BurrDBSchafflerMBFredericksonRG. Composition of the cement line and its possible mechanical role as a local interface in human compact bone. J Biomech1988; 21: 939–945.
17.
KoesterKJAgerJWRitchieRO. The true toughness of human cortical bone measured with realistically short cracks. Nat Mater2008; 7: 672–677.
18.
BerteauJ-PGineytsEPithiouxM, et al. Ratio between mature and immature enzymatic cross-links correlates with post-yield cortical bone behavior: an insight into greenstick fractures of the child fibula. Bone2015; 79: 190–195.
19.
DepalleBQinZShefelbineSJ, et al. Influence of cross-link structure, density and mechanical properties in the mesoscale deformation mechanisms of collagen fibrils. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2015; 52: 1–13.
20.
ZimmermannEAGludovatzBSchaibleE, et al. Fracture resistance of human cortical bone across multiple length-scales at physiological strain rates. Biomaterials2014; 35: 5472–5481.
21.
UralAZiouposPBuchananD, et al. The effect of strain rate on fracture toughness of human cortical bone: a finite element study. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2011; 4: 1021–1032.
22.
KulinRMJiangFVecchioKS. Loading rate effects on the R-curve behavior of cortical bone. Acta Biomater2011; 7: 724–732.
23.
TinettiME. Preventing falls in elderly persons. N Engl J Med2003; 348: 42–49.
24.
GauthierRFolletHLangerM, et al. Strain rate influence on human cortical bone toughness: a comparative study of four paired anatomical sites. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2017; 71: 223–230.
25.
GauthierRLangerMFolletH, et al. 3D micro structural analysis of human cortical bone in paired femoral diaphysis, femoral neck and radial diaphysis. J Struct Biol2018; 204: 182–190.
26.
GauthierRFolletHLangerM, et al. Relationships between human cortical bone toughness and collagen cross-links on paired anatomical locations. Bone2018; 112: 202–211.
27.
FoldhazyZ. Exercise-induced strain and strain rate in the distal radius. J Bone Joint Surg Br2005; 87: 261–266.
28.
American Society for Testing Materials. Standard test method for linear-elastic plane-strain fracture toughness of metallic materials. Annu B ASTM Stand1997; 3: E399.
29.
IrwinGR. Analysis of stresses and strains near the end of cracking traversing a plate. J Appl Mech1957; 24: 361–364.
30.
DongPHaupertSHesseB, et al. 3D osteocyte lacunar morphometric properties and distributions in human femoral cortical bone using synchrotron radiation micro-CT images. Bone2014; 60: 172–185.
31.
RhoJYKuhn-SpearingLZiouposP. Mechanical properties and the hierarchical structure of bone. Med Eng Phys1998; 20: 92–102.
32.
YeniYNBrownCUWangZ, et al. The influence of bone morphology on fracture toughness of the human femur and tibia. Bone1997; 21: 453–459.
33.
GrankeMMakowskiAJUppugantiS, et al. Prevalent role of porosity and osteonal area over mineralization heterogeneity in the fracture toughness of human cortical bone. J Biomech2016; 49: 2748–2755.
34.
TangSYVashishthD. The relative contributions of non-enzymatic glycation and cortical porosity on the fracture toughness of aging bone. J Biomech2011; 44: 330–336.
35.
WachterN.KrischakGMentzelM, et al. Correlation of bone mineral density with strength and microstructural parameters of cortical bone in vitro. Bone2002; 31: 90–95.
36.
NairAKGautieriAChangS-W, et al. Molecular mechanics of mineralized collagen fibrils in bone. Nat Commun2013; 4: 1724.
37.
GuptaHSSetoJWagermaierW, et al. Cooperative deformation of mineral and collagen in bone at the nanoscale. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA2006; 103: 17741–17746.
38.
GrankeMGrimalQSaïedA, et al. Change in porosity is the major determinant of the variation of cortical bone elasticity at the millimeter scale in aged women. Bone2011; 49: 1020–1026.
39.
ParnellWJGrimalQ. The influence of mesoscale porosity on cortical bone anisotropy. Investigations via asymptotic homogenization. J R Soc Interface2009; 6: 97–109.
40.
BalaYLefevreERouxJP, et al. Pore network microarchitecture influences human cortical bone elasticity during growth and aging. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2016; 63: 164–173.
41.
Rath BonivtchABonewaldLFNicolellaDP. Tissue strain amplification at the osteocyte lacuna: a microstructural finite element analysis. J Biomech2007; 40: 2199–2206.
42.
VerbruggenSWVaughanTJMcNamaraLM. Strain amplification in bone mechanobiology: a computational investigation of the in vivo mechanics of osteocytes. J R Soc Interface2012; 9: 2735–2744.
43.
VargaPHesseBLangerM, et al. Synchrotron X-ray phase nano-tomography-based analysis of the lacunar-canalicular network morphology and its relation to the strains experienced by osteocytes in situ as predicted by case-specific finite element analysis. Biomech Model Mechanobiol2014; 14: 267–282.
44.
NicolellaDPMoravitsDEGaleAM, et al. Osteocyte lacunae tissue strain in cortical bone. J Biomech2006; 39: 1735–1743.
45.
GriffithAA. The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci1921; 221: 163–198.
46.
InglisCE. Stresses in a plate due to the presence of cracks and sharp corners. Trans. INA1913; XLIV: 15.
47.
ChristenDLevchukASchoriS, et al. Deformable image registration and 3D strain mapping for the quantitative assessment of cortical bone microdamage. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2012; 8: 184–193.
48.
YeniYNNormanTL. Calculation of porosity and osteonal cement line effects on the effective fracture toughness of cortical bone in longitudinal crack growth. J Biomed Mater Res2000; 51: 504–509.
49.
MischinskiSUralA. Interaction of microstructure and microcrack growth in cortical bone: a finite element study. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin2011; 16: 81–94.
50.
HeM-YHutchinsonJW. Kinking of a crack out of an interface. J Appl Mech1989; 56: 270–278.
51.
WolframUSchwiedrzikJJMirzaaliMJ, et al. Characterizing microcrack orientation distribution functions in osteonal bone samples. J Microsc2016; 264: 268–281.
52.
QiuSFyhrieDPPalnitkarS, et al. Histomorphometric assessment of Haversian canal and osteocyte lacunae in different-sized osteons in human rib. Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol2003; 272: 520–525.
53.
Van OersRFMRuimermanRvan RietbergenB, et al. Relating osteon diameter to strain. Bone2008; 43: 476–482.
54.
VoideRSchneiderPStauberM, et al. Time-lapsed assessment of microcrack initiation and propagation in murine cortical bone at submicrometer resolution. Bone2009; 45: 164–173.
55.
HansmaPKFantnerGEKindtJH, et al. Sacrificial bonds in the interfibrillar matrix of bone. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact2005; 5: 313–315.
56.
HansenUZiouposPSimpsonR, et al. The effect of strain rate on the mechanical properties of human cortical bone. J Biomech Eng2008; 130: 011011.
57.
LouisOBoulpaepFWillneckerJ, et al. Cortical mineral content of the radius assessed by peripheral QCT predicts compressive strength on biomechanical testing. Bone1995; 16: 375–379.
58.
HsuJTWangSPHuangHL, et al. The assessment of trabecular bone parameters and cortical bone strength: a comparison of micro-CT and dental cone-beam CT. J Biomech2013; 46: 2611–2618.
59.
ZyssetPKDall’araEVargaP, et al. Finite element analysis for prediction of bone strength. Bonekey Rep2013; 2: 386.
60.
ZiouposPKaffyCCurreyJD. Tissue heterogeneity, composite architecture and fractal dimension effects in the fracture of ageing human bone. Int J Fract2006; 139: 407–424.
61.
RitchieRO. The conflicts between strength and toughness. Nat Mater2011; 10: 817–822.
62.
RiceJRRosengrenGF. Plane strain deformation near a crack tip in a power-law hardening material. J Mech Phys Solids1968; 16: 1–12.
63.
NallaRKStölkenJSKinneyJH, et al. Fracture in human cortical bone: local fracture criteria and toughening mechanisms. J Biomech2005; 38: 1517–1525.
64.
GrankeMMakowskiAJUppugantiS, et al. Identifying novel clinical surrogates to assess human bone fracture toughness. J Bone Miner Res2015; 30: 1290–1300.
65.
ZimmermannEARitchieRO. Bone as a structural material. Adv Healthc Mater2015; 4: 1287–1304.
66.
McCormackJStoverSMGibelingJC, et al. Effects of mineral content on the fracture properties of equine cortical bone in double-notched beams. Bone2012; 50: 1275–1280.
67.
KimmelDBReckerRRGallagherJC, et al. A comparison of iliac bone histomorphometric data in post-menopausal osteoporotic and normal subjects. Bone Miner1990; 11: 217–235.
68.
Court-BrownCMCaesarB. Epidemiology of adult fractures: a review. Injury2006; 37: 691–697.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
