Force and vibration generated in apical direction by three endodontic files of different kinematics during simulated canal preparation: An in vitro analytical study

Abstract

During root canal shaping, pain could result from the high level of force or vibration generated. This could be related to file kinematics or geometry. In the present study, a comparison is made between forces and vibrations generated by endodontic files having three different kinematics. Square pillar resin blocks were used as simulated root canals to study forces and vibrations generated by the file having reciprocating motion (WaveOne Gold), transline motion (Self-Adjusting File), and rotary motion (2Shape). The forces and vibrations were measured using the dynamometer and accelerometer, respectively. Recorded time domain signals were processed in MATLAB to calculate the root mean square value. A one-way analysis of variance and Tukey’s test for post hoc comparison at 95% confidence interval were applied over the root mean square data of different files. From a statistical analysis of the file systems, the null hypotheses could not be accepted (P < 0.05) as 95% of the confidence interval. Differences between the means were statistically significant. The root mean square values of force and vibration for WaveOne Gold significantly exceeded those of Self-Adjusting File, 2Shape1, and 2Shape2 while the root mean square values of vibration for 2Shape1 and 2Shape2 were significantly less than the Self-Adjusting File; however, the root mean square value of force for the 2Shape2 was significantly more than for the Self-Adjusting File. Under the present experimental conditions, significant differences in the root mean square values of force and vibration of the three endodontic files of different kinematics have been observed. The WaveOne Gold file system generated higher apical force and vibration than the transline and rotary file system.

Keywords

Instrumentation kinematics endodontic instruments nickel–titanium instruments force vibration root mean square

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Smith

. The Tales teeth tell : development, evolution, behavior. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Grossman

. A brief history of endodontics. J Endod 1982; 8: S36–S40.

Grande

Plotino

Butti

et al . Cross-sectional analysis of root canals prepared with NiTi rotary instruments and stainless steel reciprocating files. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 103: 120–126.

Gergi

Osta

Bourbouze

et al . Effects of three nickel titanium instrument systems on root canal geometry assessed by micro-computed tomography. Int Endod J 2015; 48: 162–170.

Cheung

GSP

Liu

CSY

. A retrospective study of endodontic treatment outcome between nickel-titanium rotary and stainless steel hand filing techniques. J Endod 2009; 35: 938–943.

Schäfer

Schulz-Bongert

Tulus

. Comparison of hand stainless steel and nickel titanium rotary instrumentation: a clinical study. J Endod 2004; 30: 432–435.

Peters

Ficd

. Current challenges and concepts in the preparation of root canal systems: a review. J Endod 2004; 30: 559–567.

Baek

S-H

Lee

C-J

Versluis

et al . Comparison of torsional stiffness of nickel-titanium rotary files with different geometric characteristics. J Endod 2011; 37: 1283–1286.

Haapasalo

Shen

. Evolution of nickel-titanium instruments: from past to future. Endod Top 2013; 29: 3–17.

10.

Çapar

Arslan

. A review of instrumentation kinematics of engine-driven nickel-titanium instruments. Int Endod J 2016; 49: 119–135.

11.

Yared

. Canal preparation with only one reciprocating instrument without prior hand filing: a new concept. Int Dent 2010; 2: 1–8.

12.

Metzger

Teperovich

Zary

et al . The self-adjusting file (SAF). Part 1: respecting the root canal anatomy—a new concept of endodontic files and its implementation. J Endod 2010; 36: 679–690.

13.

American Association of Endodontist. Glossary of endodontic terms. 9th ed. Chicago, IL: AAE.

14.

Schafer

Dammaschke

. Development and sequelae of canal transportation. Endod Top 2009; 15: 75–90.

15.

Young

Parashos

Messer

. The principles of techniques for cleaning root canals. Aust Dent J 2007; 52: S52–S63.

16.

Medha

Patil

Hoshing

et al . Evaluation of forces generated on three different rotary file systems in apical third of root canal using finite element analysis. J Clin Diagn Res 2014; 8: 243–246.

17.

Sung

Kwak

et al . Torsional and cyclic fatigue resistances of glide path preparation instruments: G-File and PathFile. Scanning 2014; 36: 500–506.

18.

Topçuoğlu

Düzgün

Aktı

et al . Laboratory comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of WaveOne Gold, Reciproc and WaveOne files in canals with a double curvature. Int Endod J 2017; 50: 713–717.

19.

Alrahabi

Alkady

. Comparison of root canal apical transportation associated with Wave One, ProTaper Next, TF, and OneShape nickel–titanium instruments in curved canals of extracted teeth: a radiographic evaluation. Saudi J Dent Res 2017; 8: 1–4.

20.

Zanesco

Só

MVR

Schmidt

et al . Apical transportation, centering ratio, and volume increase after manual, rotary, and reciprocating instrumentation in curved root canals: analysis by micro-computed tomographic and digital subtraction radiography. J Endod 2017; 43: 486–490.

21.

Bürklein

Jäger

Schäfer

. Apical transportation and canal straightening with different continuously tapered rotary file systems in severely curved root canals: F6 SkyTaper and OneShape versus Mtwo. Int Endod J 2016; 50: 983–990.

22.

Kim

Kwak

Cheung

GSP

et al . Cyclic fatigue and torsional resistance of two new nickel-titanium instruments used in reciprocation motion: Reciproc Versus WaveOne. J Endod 2012; 38: 541–544.

23.

Tambe

Nagmode

Abraham

et al . Comparison of canal transportation and centering ability of rotary protaper, one shape system and wave one system using cone beam computed tomography: an in vitro study. J Conserv Dent 2014; 17: 561.

24.

Bergmans

Van Cleynenbreugel

Beullens

et al . Progressive versus constant tapered shaft design using NiTi rotary instruments. Int Endod J 2003; 36: 288–295.

25.

Hof

Perevalov

Eltanani

et al . The Self-adjusting File (SAF). Part 2: mechanical analysis. J Endod 2010; 36: 691–696.

26.

Capar

Altunsoy

Arslan

et al . Fracture strength of roots instrumented with self-adjusting file and the ProTaper rotary systems. J Endod 2014; 40: 551–554.

27.

Kankar

Sharma

Harsha

. Nonlinear vibration signature analysis of a high speed rotor bearing system due to race imperfection. J Comput Nonlin Dyn 2012; 7: 011014.

28.

Kankar

. Fault diagnosis of rolling element bearings using vibration signature analysis. PhD Thesis, Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee, 2011. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=13714443297821755974&hl=en&oi=scholarr (accessed 10 March 2019).

29.

Harandi

Mirzaeerad

Mehrabani

et al . Incidence of dentinal crack after root canal preparation by ProTaper Universal, Neolix and SafeSider systems. Iran Endod J 2017; 12: 432–438.

30.

Özyürek

Tek

Yılmaz

et al . Incidence of apical crack formation and propagation during removal of root canal filling materials with different engine driven nickel-titanium instruments. Restor Dent Endod 2017; 42: 332–341.

31.

Jeon

Park

Cho

et al . Vibration characteristics of endodontic motors with different motion: reciprocation and conventional rotation. J Korean Dent Assoc 2014; 52: 734–743.

32.

Choi

D-M

Kim

J-W

Park

S-H

et al . Vibrations generated by several nickel-titanium endodontic file systems during canal shaping in an ex vivo model. J Endod 2017; 43: 1–4.

33.

Poole

Lea

Dyson

et al . Vibration characteristics of dental high-speed turbines and speed-increasing handpieces. J Dent 2008; 36: 488–493.

34.

J-H

Kwak

Versluis

et al . The geometric effect of an off-centered cross-section on nickel–titanium rotary instruments: a finite element analysis study. J Dent Sci 2017; 12: 173–178.

35.

Karataş

Hicran Ateş

Damla Özsu

et al . Dentinal crack formation during root canal preparations by the twisted file adaptive, ProTaper Next, ProTaper Universal, and WaveOne instruments. J Endod 2015; 51: 261–264.

36.

Nayak

Kankar

Jain

et al . Force and vibration correlation analysis in the self-adjusting file during root canal shaping: an in-vitro study. J Dent Sci 2018; 13: 184–189.

37.

Takamori

Furukawa

Morikawa

et al . Basic study on vibrations during tooth preparations caused by high-speed drilling and Er:YAG laser irradiation. Laser Surg Med 2003; 32: 25–31.

38.

Schrader

Peters

. Analysis of torque and force with differently tapered rotary endodontic instruments in vitro. J Endod 2005; 31: 120–123.

39.

J-H

Kwak

Sigurdsson

et al . Stress generation during pecking motion of rotary nickel-titanium instruments with different pecking depth. J Endod 2017; 43: 1688–1691.

40.

Berutti

Chiandussi

Paolino

et al . Canal shaping with waveone primary reciprocating files and protaper system: a comparative study. J Endod 2012; 38: 505–509.

41.

Lee

Kwak

et al . Geometric optimization for development of glide path preparation nickel-titanium rotary instrument. J Endod 2015; 41: 916–919.

42.

Khalilak

Fallahdoost

Dadresanfar

et al . Comparison of extracted teeth and simulated resin blocks on apical canal transportation. Iran Endod J 2008; 3: 109–112.

43.

Kinney

Marshall

. The mechanical properties of human dentin: a critical review and re-evaluation of the dental literature. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2003; 14: 13–29.

44.

Schneider

. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1971; 32: 271–275.

45.

Calberson

FLG

Deroose

CAJG

Hommez

GMG

et al . Shaping ability of GTTM rotary files in simulated resin root canals. Int Endod J 2002; 35: 607–614.

46.

Webber

. Shaping canals with confidence: WaveOne GOLD single-file. Roots 2015; 1: 34–40.

47.

Igba

Alemzadeh

Durugbo

et al . Analysing RMS and peak values of vibration signals for condition monitoring of wind turbine gearboxes. Renew Energy 2016; 91: 90–106.

48.

Večeř

Kreidl

Šmíd

. Condition indicators for gearbox condition monitoring systems. Acta Polytech 2005; 45: 35–43.

49.

Amitabha

Asok Kumar

. Manufacturing science. 2nd ed. New Delhi, India: Affiliated East-west Press Private Limited, 1986.

50.

Kim

Sung

et al . Stress generation during self-adjusting file movement: minimally invasive instrumentation. J Endod 2013; 39: 1572–1575.

51.

Gupta

Pandey

Gupta

et al . Rotary ultrasonic drilling on bone: a novel technique to put an end to thermal injury to bone. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine 2017; 231: 189–196.

52.

J-H

Park

S-S

. Influence of glide path on the screw-in effect and torque of nickel-titanium rotary files in simulated resin root canals. Restor Dent Endod 2012; 37: 215–219.