Evaluation of skin-mounted sensor for head impact measurement

Abstract

The requirement to measure the number and severity of head impacts in sports has led to the development of many wearable sensors. The objective of this study was to determine the reliability and accuracy of a wearable head impact sensor: xPatch, X2Biosystems, Inc. The skin-mounted sensor, xPatch, was fixed onto a Hybrid III headform and dropped using an impact test rig. A total of 400 impacts were performed, ranging from 20g to 200g linear acceleration, and impact velocities of 1.2 - 3.9 m/s. During each impact, the peak linear acceleration, angular velocity and angular acceleration were recorded and compared to the reference calibrated data. Impacts were also recorded using a high-speed video camera. The results show that the linear acceleration recorded by the xPatch during frontal and side impacts had errors of up to 24% when compared to the referenced data. The angular velocity and angular acceleration had substantially larger errors of up to 47.5% and 57%, respectively. The location of the impact had a significant effect on the results: if the impact was to the side of the head, the device on that side may have an error of up to 71%, thus highlighting the importance of device location. All impacts were recorded using two separate xPatches and, in certain cases, the difference in angular velocity between the devices was 43%. In conclusion, the xPatch can be useful for identifying impacts and recording linear accelerations during front and side impacts, but the rotational velocity and acceleration data need to be interpreted with caution.

Keywords

xPatch head impact sensor head acceleration

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Langlois

Rutland-Brown

Wald

MM.

The epidemiology and impact of traumatic brain injury: a brief overview. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2006; 21(5): 375–378.

Elliott

Margulies

Maltese

et al . Accounting for sampling variability, injury under-reporting, and sensor error in concussion injury risk curves. J Biomech 2015; 48(12): 3059–3065.

Sye

Sullivan

McCrory

et al . High school rugby players’ understanding of concussion and return to play guidelines. Br J Sports Med 2006; 40(12): 1003–1005.

McCrory

Meeuwisse

Dvorak

et al . Consensus statement on concussion in sport – the 5th international conference on concussion in sport held in Berlin, October 2016. Br J Sports Med2017; 51: 838–847.

Broglio

Schnebel

Sosnoff

et al . The biomechanical properties of concussions in high school football. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2010; 42(11): 2064–2071.

Abel

Gennarelli

Segawa

Incidence and severity of cerebral concussion in the rhesus monkey following sagittal plane angular acceleration. SAE technical paper 780886, 1978.

Bayly

Cohen

Leister

et al . Deformation of the human brain induced by mild acceleration. J Neurotrauma 2005; 22(8): 845–856.

Hardy

Mason

Foster

et al . A study of the response of the human cadaver head to impact. Stapp Car Crash J 2007; 51: 17–80.

Post

Hoshizaki

TB.

Rotational acceleration, brain tissue strain, and the relationship to concussion. J Biomech Eng 2015; 137(3): 030801.

10.

King

Yang

Zhang

et al . Is head injury caused by linear or angular acceleration. In: Proceedings of the 2003 IRCOBI conference, Lisbon, 25–26 September 2003, pp.1–12. Zurich: IRCOBI.

11.

Takhounts

Craig

Moorhouse

et al . Development of brain injury criteria (BrIC). Stapp Car Crash J 2013; 57: 243–266.

12.

Zhang

Yang

King

AI.

Comparison of brain responses between frontal and lateral impacts by finite element modeling. J Neurotrauma 2001; 18(1): 21–30.

13.

Zhang

Yang

King

AI.

A proposed injury threshold for mild traumatic brain injury. J Biomech Eng 2004; 126(2): 226–236.

14.

Crisco

Chu

Greenwald

. An algorithm for estimating acceleration magnitude and impact location using multiple nonorthogonal single-axis accelerometers. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 2014; 126(6): 849–854.

15.

Hanlon

Bir

Validation of a wireless head acceleration measurement system for use in soccer play. J Appl Biomech 2010; 26(4): 424–431.

16.

Jadischke

Viano

Dau

et al . On the accuracy of the Head Impact Telemetry (HIT) System used in football helmets. J Biomech 2013; 46(13): 2310–2315.

17.

Duma

Manoogian

Bussone

et al . Analysis of real-time head accelerations in collegiate football players. Clin J Sport Med 2005; 15(1): 3–8.

18.

Rowson

Duma

Beckwith

et al . Rotational head kinematics in football impacts: an injury risk function for concussion. Ann Biomed Eng 2012; 40(1): 1–13.

19.

Beckwith

Chu

Greenwald

RM.

Validation of a noninvasive system for measuring head acceleration for use during boxing competition. J Appl Biomech 2007; 23(3): 238–244.

20.

Caccese

Lamond

Buckley

et al . Reducing purposeful headers from goal kicks and punts may reduce cumulative exposure to head acceleration. Res Sports Med 2016; 24(4): 407–415.

21.

Hanlon

Bir

CA.

Real-time head acceleration measurement in girls’ youth soccer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2012; 44(6): 1102–1108.

22.

Naunheim

Standeven

Richter

et al . Comparison of impact data in hockey, football, and soccer. J Trauma 2000; 48(5): 938–941.

23.

King

Hume

Gissane

et al . Head impacts in a junior rugby league team measured with a wireless head impact sensor: an exploratory analysis. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2017; 19(1): 13–23.

24.

Higgins

Halstead

Snyder-Mackler

et al . Measurement of impact acceleration: mouthpiece accelerometer versus helmet accelerometer. J Athl Train 2007; 42(1): 5–10.

25.

Cummiskey

Schiffmiller

Talavage

et al . Reliability and accuracy of helmet-mounted and head-mounted devices used to measure head accelerations. Proc IMechE, Part P: J Sports Engineering and Technology 2017; 231(2): 144–153.

26.

Wood

Panzer

Bass

et al . Viscoelastic properties of Hybrid III head skin. SAE Int J Mater Manuf 2010; 3: 186–193.

27.

Schussler

Stark

Bolte

et al . Comparison of a head mounted impact measurement device to the Hybrid III anthropomorphic testing device in a controlled laboratory setting. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2017; 12(4): 592–600.

28.

Nevins

Smith

Kensrud

Laboratory evaluation of wireless head impact sensor. Procedia Engineer 2015; 112: 175–179.

29.

National Instruments, LabVIEW. Using Fast Fourier Transforms and power spectra in LabVIEW, 2017, http://www.ni.com/white-paper/4541/en/

30.

Press

Rowson

Quantifying head impact exposure in collegiate women’s soccer. Clin J Sport Med 2017; 27(2): 104–110.

31.

Laksari

Kuo

et al . Bandwidth and sample rate requirements for wearable head impact sensors. J Biomech 2016; 49: 2918–2924.

32.

Siegmund

Guskiewicz

Marshall

et al . Laboratory validation of two wearable sensor systems for measuring head impact severity in football players. Ann Biomed Eng 2016; 44(4): 1257–1274.

33.

Davenport

Whitlow

Urban

et al . Abnormal white matter integrity related to head impact exposure in a season of high school varsity football. J Neurotrauma 2014; 31(19): 1617–1624.

34.

Guskiewicz

McCrea

Marshall

et al . Cumulative effects associated with recurrent concussion in collegiate football players: the NCAA Concussion Study. JAMA 2003; 290(19): 2549–2555.

35.

McCuen

Svaldi

Breedlove

et al . Collegiate women’s soccer players suffer greater cumulative head impacts than their high school counterparts. J Biomech 2015; 48(13): 3720–3723.

36.

Swartz

Broglio

Cook

et al . Early results of a helmetless-tackling intervention to decrease head impacts in football players. J Athl Train 2015; 50(12): 1219–1222.