Biomechanical comparison of screw-based zones of a spatial subchondral support plate for proximal humerus fractures

Abstract

Stabilisation of proximal humerus fractures remains a surgical challenge. Spatial subchondral support (S3) plate promises to overcome common complications associated with conventional proximal humerus plates. This study compared the biomechanical performance of S3 plate with a fixed-angle hybrid blade (Equinoxe Fx) plate and a conventional fixed-angle locking plate (PHILOS). The effects of removal of different S3 plate screws on the humeral stability were also investigated. A total of 20 synthetic left humeri were osteotomised transversely at the surgical neck to simulate a two-part fracture and were each treated with an S3 plate. Head screws were divided into three zones based on their distance from the fracture site. Specimens were divided into four equal groups where one group acted as a control with all screws and three groups had one of the screw zones missing. With humeral head fixed, humeral shaft was first displaced 5 mm in extension, flexion, valgus and varus direction (elastic testing) and then until 30 mm varus displacement (plastic testing). Load–displacement data were recorded to determine construct stiffness in elastic tests and assess specimens’ varus stability under plastic testing. Removal of the screw nearest to the fracture site led to a 20.71% drop in mean elastic varus bending stiffness. Removal of the two inferomedial screw above it resulted in a larger drop. The proximal screw pair had the largest contribution to extension and flexion bending stiffness. Varus stiffness of S3 plate constructs was higher than PHILOS and Fx plate constructs. Stability of humeri treated with S3 plate depends on screws’ number, orientation and location. Varus stiffness of S3 plate construct (10.54 N/mm) was higher than that of PHILOS (6.61 N/mm) and Fx (7.59 N/mm) plate constructs. We attribute this to S3 plates’ thicker cross section, the 135° inclination of its screws with respect to the humeral shaft and the availability of pegs for subchondral support.

Keywords

Biomechanical testing proximal humerus fractures plate fixation spatial subchondral support locking plate

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baron

Barret

Karagas

. The epidemiology of peripheral fractures. Bone 1996; 18(Suppl. 3): 209S–213S.

Kannus

Palvanen

Niemi

et al . Increasing number and incidence of osteoporotic fractures of the proximal humerus in elderly people. BMJ 1996; 313(7064): 1051–1052.

Rangan

Handoll

Brealey

et al . Surgical vs nonsurgical treatment of adults with displaced fractures of the proximal humerus: the PROFHER randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2015; 313(10): 1037–1047.

Murray

Amin

White

et al . Proximal humeral fractures: current concepts in classification, treatment and outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011; 93(1): 1–11.

Seide

Triebe

Faschingbauer

et al . Locked vs. unlocked plate osteosynthesis of the proximal humerus – a biomechanical study. Clin Biomech 2007; 22(2): 176–182.

Siffri

Peindl

Coley

et al . Biomechanical analysis of blade plate versus locking plate fixation for a proximal humerus fracture: comparison using cadaveric and synthetic humeri. J Orthop Trauma 2006; 20(8): 547–554.

Weinstein

Bratton

Ciccone

et al . Locking plates improve torsional resistance in the stabilization of three-part proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elb Surg 2006; 15(2): 239–243.

Gille

Schulz

a P

Queitsch

et al . Initial results of the S3-humerus plate. Open Orthop J 2008; 2: 133–136.

Stoddard

Pryce

Potter

et al . Early experience of managing proximal humerus fractures with the S3 plate. Shoulder Elb 2011; 3(4): 215–218.

10.

Charalambous

Siddique

Valluripalli

et al . Proximal humeral internal locking system (PHILOS) for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2007; 127(3): 205–210.

11.

Südkamp

Bayer

Hepp

et al . Open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures with use of the locking proximal humerus plate. Results of a prospective, multicenter, observational study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91(805): 1320–1328.

12.

Jabran

Peach

Ren

. Biomechanical analysis of plate systems for proximal humerus fractures: a systematic literature review. Biomed Eng Online 2018; 17(1): 47.

13.

Jabran

Peach

Zou

et al . Hybrid blade and locking plate fixation for proximal humerus fractures: a comparative biomechanical analysis. Biomed Eng Online 2018; 17(1): 10.

14.

Sawbones. Biomechanical test materials. 2017, p.6. Washington: Pacific Research Labs.

15.

Biomet-Trauma. S3 humerus plating system – surgical technique. 2014. USA: Zimmer-Biomet.

16.

Chow

Begum

Beaupre

et al . Proximal humeral fracture fixation: locking plate construct +/– intramedullary fibular allograft. J Shoulder Elb Surg 2012; 21(7): 894–901.

17.

Poppen

Walker

. Forces at the glenohumeral joint in abduction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1978(135): 165–170.

18.

Weeks

Begum

Beaupre

et al . Locking plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures with impaction of the fracture site to restore medial column support: a biomechanical study. J Shoulder Elb Surg 2013; 22(11): 1552–1557.

19.

Sproul

Iyengar

Devcic

et al . A systematic review of locking plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures. Injury 2011; 42(4): 408–413.

20.

Aalco Metals Limited. Stainless steel – grade 316 datasheet. 2013, pp.3–5. England: Aalco Metals Limited.

21.

Faraj

Kooistra

Vd Stappen

WAH

et al . Results of 131 consecutive operated patients with a displaced proximal humerus fracture: an analysis with more than two years follow-up. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2011; 21(1): 7–12.

22.

Geiger

Maier

Kelm

et al . Functional outcome and complications following PHILOS plate fixation in proximal humeral fractures. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2010; 44(1): 1–6.

23.

Synthes. PHILOS – operative technique. 2005. USA: Depuy Synthes.

24.

Boileau

Walch

. The three-dimensional geometry of the proximal humerus. Implications for surgical technique and prosthetic design. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1997; 79(5): 857–865.

25.

Robertson

Yuan

Bigliani

et al . Three-dimensional analysis of the proximal part of the humerus: relevance to arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000; 82-A(11): 1594–1602.

26.

Yewlett

King

Brooks

et al . What is the single most important technical aspect when fixing a proximal humeral fracture with a PHILOS plate? MOJ Orthop Rheumatol 2016; 6(2): 2–6.

27.

Gardner

Weil

Barker

et al . The importance of medial support in locked plating of proximal humerus fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2007; 21(3): 185–191.

28.

Fuchs

Burchhardt

Losch

et al . Open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures with a cannulated blade plate. Orthop Traumatol 2002; 10(4): 268–276.

29.

Long

Rack

. Titanium alloys in total joint replacement – a materials science perspective. Biomaterials 1998; 19: 1621–1639.

30.

Strauss

Schwarzkopf

Kummer

et al . The current status of locked plating: the good, the bad, and the ugly. J Orthop Trauma 2008; 22(7): 479–486.

31.

Gautier

Sommer

. Guidelines for the clinical application of the LCP. Injury 2003; (34 Suppl. 2): B63–B76.

32.

Erhardt

Stoffel

Kampshoff

et al . The position and number of screws influence screw perforation of the humeral head in modern locking plates: a cadaver study. J Orthop Trauma 2012; 26(10): e188–e192.

33.

Cohen

Amaral

Monteiro

et al . Osteosynthesis of proximal humeral end fractures with fixed-angle plate and locking screws: technique and results. Rev Bras Ortop 2009; 44(2): 106–111.

34.

Badman

Mighell

Drake

. Proximal humeral nonunions: surgical technique with fibular strut allograft and fixed-angle locked plating. Tech Shoulder Elb Surg 2006; 7(2): 95–101.

35.

Morelli

Travizanuto

RED

. Proximal humerus fractures: comparative study of two different fixation methods. Acta Ortop Bras 2010; 18(2): 79–84.

36.

Helmy

Hintermann

. New trends in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 442: 100–108.

37.

Stoffel

Dieter

Stachowiak

et al . Biomechanical testing of the LCP – how can stability in locked internal fixators be controlled? Injury 2003; 34(Suppl. 2): B11–B19.

38.

Kralinger

Gschwentner

Wambacher

et al . Proximal humeral fractures: what is semi-rigid? Biomechanical properties of semi-rigid implants, a biomechanical cadaver based evaluation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2008; 28(2): 205–210.

39.

Brunner

Resch

Babst

et al . The Humerusblock NG: a new concept for stabilization of proximal humeral fractures and its biomechanical evaluation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2012; 132(7): 985–992.

40.

Sinha

Kelly

. Fixed angle locking plates for proximal humeral fracture fixation. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2010; 92(8): 631–634.

41.

Rose

Sutter

Mears

et al . Proximal humeral fractures: a biomechanical comparison of locking plate constructs in a cadaveric 3-part fracture model. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil 2010; 1(2): 73–77.

42.

Egol

Ong

Walsh

et al . Early complications in proximal humerus fractures (OTA Types 11) treated with locked plates. J Orthop Trauma 2008; 22(3): 159–164.

43.

Koukakis

Apostolou

Taneja

et al . Fixation of proximal humerus fractures using the PHILOS plate: early experience. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 442: 115–120.

44.

Owsley

Gorczyca

. Fracture displacement and screw cutout after open reduction and locked plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures [corrected]. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008; 90(2): 233–240.

45.

Brunner

Sommer

Bahrs

et al . Open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures using a proximal humeral locked plate: a prospective multicenter analysis. J Orthop Trauma 2009; 23(3): 163–172.

46.

Meier

Messmer

Regazzoni

et al . Unexpected high complication rate following internal fixation of unstable proximal humerus fractures with an angled blade plate. J Orthop Trauma 2006; 20(4): 253–260.

47.

Liew

ASL

Johnson

Patterson

et al . Effect of screw placement on fixation in the humeral head. J Shoulder Elb Surg 2000; 9(5): 423–426.

48.

Badman

Mighell

. Fixed-angle locked plating of two-, three-, and four-part proximal humerus fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2008; 16(5): 294–302.

49.

Kathrein

Kralinger

Blauth

et al . Biomechanical comparison of an angular stable plate with augmented and non-augmented screws in a newly developed shoulder test bench. Clin Biomech 2013; 28(3): 273–277.

50.

Röderer

Scola

Schmolz

et al . Biomechanical in vitro assessment of screw augmentation in locked plating of proximal humerus fractures. Injury 2013; 44(10): 1327–1332.

51.

Gradl

Knobe

Stoffel

et al . Biomechanical evaluation of locking plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures augmented with calcium phosphate cement. J Orthop Trauma 2013; 27(7): 399–404.

52.

Raphael

Booker

Saing

et al . Locked plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures using cannulated subchondral support pegs. Shoulder Elb 2013; 5(3): 178–182.

53.

Yamamoto

Hongo

Berglund

et al . Biomechanical analysis of a novel locking plate with smooth pegs versus a conventional locking plate with threaded screws for proximal humerus fractures. J Shoulder Elb Surg 2013; 22(4): 445–450.

54.

Schumer

Muckley

Markert

et al . Biomechanical comparison of a proximal humeral locking plate using two methods of head fixation. J Shoulder Elb Surg 2010; 19(4): 495–501.

55.

Huff

Taylor

Jani

et al . Proximal humeral fracture fixation: a biomechanical comparison of two constructs. J Shoulder Elb Surg 2013; 22(1): 129–136.

56.

Duda

Epari

Babst

et al . Mechanical evaluation of a new minimally invasive device for stabilization of proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: a cadaver study. Acta Orthop 2007; 78(3): 430–435.

57.

Lescheid

Zdero

Shah

et al . The biomechanics of locked plating for repairing proximal humerus fractures with or without medial cortical support. J Trauma 2010; 69(5): 1235–1242.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.15 MB

0.16 MB

0.15 MB

0.14 MB