In-vivo analysis of ankle joint movement for patient-specific kinematic characterization

Abstract

In this article, a method for the experimental in-vivo characterization of the ankle kinematics is proposed. The method is meant to improve personalization of various ankle joint treatments, such as surgical decision-making or design and application of an orthosis, possibly to increase their effectiveness. This characterization in fact would make the treatments more compatible with the specific patient’s joint physiological conditions. This article describes the experimental procedure and the analytical method adopted, based on the instantaneous and mean helical axis theories. The results obtained in this experimental analysis reveal that more accurate techniques are necessary for a robust in-vivo assessment of the tibio-talar axis of rotation.

Keywords

In-vivo kinematic analysis ankle joint kinematics ankle treatments customized orthosis instantaneous helical axis mean helical axis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Radtka

Oliveira

Lindstrom

et al . The kinematic and kinetic effects of solid, hinged, and no ankle-foot orthoses on stair locomotion in healthy adults. Gait Posture 2006; 24(2): 211–218.

Leardini

Aquila

Caravaggi

et al . Multi-segment foot mobility in a hinged ankle-foot orthosis: the effect of rotation axis position. Gait Posture 2014; 40(1): 274–277.

Van den Bogert

Smith

Nigg

BM.

In vivo determination of the anatomical axes of the ankle joint complex: an optimization approach. J Biomech 1994; 27(12): 1477–1488.

Imai

Tokunaga

Takatori

et al . In vivo three-dimensional analysis of hindfoot kinematics. Foot Ankle Int 2009; 30(11): 1094–1100.

Giacomozzi

Cesinaro

Basile

et al . Measurement device for ankle joint kinematic and dynamic characterisation. Med Biol Eng Comput 2003; 41(4): 486–493.

Lundberg

Svensson

Németh

et al . The axis of rotation of the ankle joint. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1989; 71(1): 94–99.

Leardini

O’Connor

Catani

et al . Kinematics of the human ankle complex in passive flexion; a single degree of freedom system. J Biomech 1999; 32(2): 111–118.

Woltring

De Lange

Kauer

JMG

et al . Instantaneous helical axis estimation via natural, cross-validated splines. In: Bergmann

Klbel

Rohlmann

(eds) Biomechanics: basic and applied research (Developments in biomechanics vol. 3). Berlin: Springer, 1987, pp.121–128.

Stokdijk

Meskers

Veeger

et al . Determination of the optimal elbow axis for evaluation of placement of prostheses. Clin Biomech 1999; 14(3): 177–184.

10.

Reichl

Auzinger

Identifying tibio-femoral joint kinematics: individual adjustment versus numerical robustness. IFAC P Ser 2012; 45(2): 819–824.

11.

Cappello

Leardini

Catani

et al . Selection and validation of skin array technical references based on optimal rigid model estimation. In: Proceedings of the III international symposium on 3D analysis of human movement, Stockholm, 5–8 July 1994, pp.15–18.

12.

Cappello

La Palombara

Leardini

Optimization and smoothing techniques in movement analysis. Int J Biomed Comput 1996; 41(3): 137–151.

13.

Berme

Cappozzo

Biomechanics of human movement: applications in rehabilitation, sports and ergonomics (chapter 10). Worthington, OH: Bertec Corporation, 1990, pp.203–231.

14.

Leardini

Sawacha

Paolini

et al . A new anatomically based protocol for gait analysis in children. Gait Posture 2007; 26(4): 560–571.

15.

Cappozzo

Catani

Croce

et al . Position and orientation in space of bones during movement: anatomical frame definition and determination. Clin Biomech 1995; 10(4): 171–178.

16.

Conti

Cristofolini

Juszczyk

et al . Comparison of three standard anatomical reference frames for the tibia-fibula complex. J Biomech 2008; 41(16): 3384–3389.

17.

Siegler

Allard

et al . ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate system of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion–part i: ankle, hip, and spine. International Society of Biomechanics. J Biomech 2002; 35(4): 543–548.