Plate fixation of periprosthetic femur fractures: What happens to the cement mantle?

Abstract

Osteosynthesis of periprosthetic femur fractures by screw fixation around the implanted prosthetic stem is currently regarded as the biomechanically superior option compared with cerclage. The aim of this biomechanical study was damage analysis of the cement mantle after revision screw insertion.

A prosthetic stem (Bicontact) was implanted in 20 cadaveric femora in cemented technique. A locking compression plate (Synthes) was then applied to the lateral femur at the level of the prosthetic stem. The method of plate fixation to the femur was assigned randomly to three groups: bicortical non-locking screws, monocortical locking screws, and bicortical locking screws. This was followed by applying a fluctuating axial load (2100 N, 0.5 Hz) for 20,000 cycles. After testing, macroscopic and microscopic evaluations of the cement mantle were conducted.

Cracks formed in the cement mantle in 14% of the 80 screw holes. The type of screw (bicortical or monocortical; locking or non-locking) had no significant effect on the number of cracks (p = 0.52). The relationship between manifestation of crack damage and cement mantle thickness was not significant (p = 0.36), whereas the relationship between crack formation and screw position was significant (p = 0.019). Those screws whose circumference was only partially within the cement mantle yielded a significantly lower number of cracks compared with screws positioned completely within the cement mantle or even touching the prosthetic stem.

In order to reduce the incidence of crack formation in the cement mantle during plate osteosynthesis of periprosthetic femur fractures, the screws should not be either placed within the cement mantle or make direct contact with the stem.

Keywords

Biomedical cements periprosthetic fracture Total Hip Athroplasty plate osteosynthesis angle stable screws

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Konstantinidis

Hauschild

Beckmann

. Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures with two different minimal invasive angle-stable plates: biomechanical comparison studies on cadaveric bones. Injury2010; 41: 1256–1261.

Berry

. Management of periprosthetic fractures: the hip. J Arthroplasty2002; 17: 11–13.

Ogden

Rendall

. Fractures beneath hip prostheses: a special indication for Parham bands and plating (abstract). Orthop Trans1978; 2: 70.

Giannoudis

Kanakaris

Tsiridis

. Principles of internal fixation and selection of implants for periprosthetic femoral fractures. Injury2007; 38: 669–687.

Schmotzer

Tchejeyan

Dall

. Surgical management of intra- and postoperative fractures of the femur about the tip of the stem in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty1996; 11: 709–717.

Lewis

Caroom

Wee

. Tangential bicortical locked fixation improves stability in Vancouver B1 periprosthetic femur fractures: a biomechanical study. J Orthop Trauma2015; 29: e364–e370.

Wahnert

Schliemann

Raschke

. Treatment of periprosthetic fractures: new concepts in operative treatment. Orthopade2014; 43: 306–313.

Kampshoff

Stoffel

Yates

. The treatment of periprosthetic fractures with locking plates: effect of drill and screw type on cement mantles: a biomechanical analysis. Arch Orthop Traum Su2010; 130: 627–632.

Zdero

Walker

Waddell

. Biomechanical evaluation of periprosthetic femoral fracture fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am2008; 90: 1068–1077.

10.

Lenz

Perren

Gueorguiev

. A biomechanical study on proximal plate fixation techniques in periprosthetic femur fractures. Injury2014; 45(Suppl. 1): S71–S75.

11.

Wahnert

Schroder

Schulze

. Biomechanical comparison of two angular stable plate constructions for periprosthetic femur fracture fixation. Int Orthop2014; 38: 47–53.

12.

Giesinger

Ebneter

Day

. Can plate osteosynthesis of periprosthethic femoral fractures cause cement mantle failure around a stable hip stem? A biomechanical analysis. J Arthroplasty2014; 29: 1308–1312.

13.

Konstantinidis

Papaioannou

Hirschmuller

. Intramedullary nailing of trochanteric fractures: central or caudal positioning of the load carrier? A biomechanical comparative study on cadaver bones. Injury2013; 44: 784–790.

14.

Konstantinidis

Papaioannou

Blanke

. Failure after osteosynthesis of trochanteric fractures. Where is the limit of osteoporosis?Osteoporos Int2013; 24: 2701–2706.

15.

Konstantinidis

Papaioannou

Hirschmüller

. Effects of muscle-equivalent forces on the biomechanical behavior of proximal femur fracture models: a pilot study on artificial bones. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine2012; 226: 681–685.

16.

Kreutzer

Schneider

Schlegel

. Cemented total hip arthroplasty in Germany—an update. Z Orthop Unfall2005; 143: 48–55.

17.

Saha

Pal

. Mechanical properties of bone cement: a review. J Biomed Mater Res1984; 18: 435–462.

18.

Fulkerson

Koval

Preston

. Fixation of periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures associated with cemented femoral stems: a biomechanical comparison of locked plating and conventional cable plates. J Orthop Trauma2006; 20: 89–93.