Assembly force and taper angle difference influence the relative motion at the stem–neck interface of bi-modular hip prostheses

Abstract

Bi-modular hip arthroplasty prostheses allow adaptation to the individual patient anatomy and the combination of different materials but introduce an additional interface, which was related lately to current clinical issues. Relative motion at the additional taper interface might increase the overall risk of fretting, corrosion, metallic debris and early failure. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the assembly force influences the relative motion and seating behaviour at the stem–neck interface of a bi-modular hip prosthesis (Metha^®; Aesculap AG, Tuttlingen, Germany) and whether this relation is influenced by the taper angle difference between male and female taper angles. Neck adapters made of titanium (Ti6Al4V) and CoCr (CoCr29Mo) were assembled with a titanium stem using varying assembly forces and mechanically loaded. A contactless eddy current measurement system was used to record the relative motion between prosthesis stem and neck adapter. Higher relative motion was observed for Ti neck adapters compared to the CoCr ones (p < 0.001). Higher assembly forces caused increased seating distances (p < 0.001) and led to significantly reduced relative motion (p = 0.019). Independent of neck material type, prostheses with larger taper angle difference between male and female taper angles exhibited decreased relative motion (p < 0.001). Surgeons should carefully use assembly forces above 4 kN to decrease the amount of relative motion within the taper interface. Maximum assembly forces, however, should be limited to prevent periprosthetic fractures. Manufacturers should optimize taper angle differences to increase the resistance against relative motion.

Keywords

Modular prosthesis relative motion assembly force stem–neck interface taper angle difference

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Grupp

Weik

Bloemer

. Modular titanium alloy neck adapter failures in hip replacement – failure mode analysis and influence of implant material. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2010; 11: 3.

Jolles

Factors predisposing to dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2002; 17: 282–288.

Soong

Rubash

Macaulay

Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2004; 12: 314–321.

Hart

Ilo

Underwood

. The relationship between the angle of version and rate of wear of retrieved metal-on-metal resurfacings: a prospective, CT-based study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011; 93: 315–320.

Krishnan

Blunn

. Modular neck femoral stems. Bone Joint J 2013; 95: 1011–1021.

Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. 2013 annual report – Australian registry. Adelaide, SA: Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry, 2013.

Atwood

Patten

Bozic

. Corrosion-induced fracture of a double-modular hip prosthesis: a case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010; 92: 1522–1525.

Baxmann

Jauch

Schilling

. The influence of contact conditions and micromotions on the fretting behavior of modular titanium alloy taper connections. Med Eng Phys 2013; 35: 676–683.

Ellman

Levine

BR.

Fracture of the modular femoral neck component in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2013; 28: 196.

10.

Jauch

Huber

Haschke

. Design parameters and the material coupling are decisive for the micromotion magnitude at the stem-neck interface of bi-modular hip implants. Med Eng Phys 2014; 36: 300–307.

11.

Gilbert

Buckley

Jacobs

JJ.

In vivo corrosion of modular hip prosthesis components in mixed and similar metal combinations. The effect of crevice, stress, motion, and alloy coupling. J Biomed Mater Res 1993; 27: 1533–1544.

12.

Brown

Flemming

Kawalec

. Fretting corrosion accelerates crevice corrosion of modular hip tapers. J Appl Biomater 1995; 6: 19–26.

13.

Gilbert

Sivan

Liu

. Direct in vivo inflammatory cell-induced corrosion of CoCrMo alloy orthopedic implant surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res A 2015; 103: 211–223.

14.

Degat

Zhou

Vincent

Fretting cracking behaviour on pre-stressed aluminium alloy specimens. Tribol Int 1997; 30: 215–223.

15.

Jacobs

Urban

Gilbert

. Local and distant products from modularity. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995; 319: 94–105.

16.

Urban

Jacobs

Gilbert

. Migration of corrosion products from modular hip prostheses. Particle microanalysis and histopathological findings. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1994; 76: 1345–1359.

17.

Langton

Jameson

Joyce

. Early failure of metal-on-metal bearings in hip resurfacing and large-diameter total hip replacement: a consequence of excess wear. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010; 92: 38–46.

18.

Takamura

Langton

Gandhi

. The main issue of large diameter MoM total hip arthroplasty: the taper junction. In: Proceedings of the annual meeting of the American academy of orthopaedic surgeons, San Francisco, CA, 7–11 February.

19.

Garbuz

Tanzer

Greidanus

The John Charnley Award: metal-on-metal hip resurfacing versus large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468: 318–325.

20.

Viceconti

Baleani

Squarzoni

. Fretting wear in a modular neck hip prosthesis. J Biomed Mater Res 1997; 35: 207–216.

21.

Huber

Reinisch

Trettenhahn

. Presence of corrosion products and hypersensitivity-associated reactions in periprosthetic tissue after aseptic loosening of total hip replacements with metal bearing surfaces. Acta Biomater 2009; 5: 172–180.

22.

Hallab

Jacobs

JJ.

Biologic effects of implant debris. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 2009; 67: 182–188.

23.

Lombardi

Mallory

Vaughn

. Aseptic loosening in total hip arthroplasty secondary to osteolysis induced by wear debris from titanium-alloy modular femoral heads. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1989; 71: 1337–1342.

24.

Meyer

Mueller

Goldau

. Corrosion at the cone/taper interface leads to failure of large-diameter metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties. Clinical Orthopaed Relat Res 2012; 470: 3101–3108.

25.

Gill

IPS

Webb

Sloan

. Corrosion at the neck-stem junction as a cause of metal ion release and pseudotumour formation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2012; 94: 895–900.

26.

Bishop

Witt

Pourzal

. Wear patterns of taper connections in retrieved large diameter metal-on-metal bearings. J Orthop Res 2013; 31: 1116–1122.

27.

Forschungskuratorium Maschinenbau e.V. Reibkorrosion – Vorhaben Nr. 6, 56.6000. Frankfurt am Main: Forschungsheft Maschinenbau-Verlag GmbH, 1976.

28.

Bergmann

Deuretzbacher

Heller

. Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. J Biomech 2001; 34: 859–871.

29.

Morlock

Schneider

Bluhm

. Duration and frequency of everyday activities in total hip patients. J Biomech 2001; 34: 873–881.

30.

Jauch

Huber

Hoenig

. Influence of material coupling and assembly condition on the magnitude of micromotion at the stem-neck interface of a modular hip endoprosthesis. J Biomech 2011; 44: 1747–1751.

31.

Duisabeau

Combrade

Forest

Environmental effect on fretting of metallic materials for orthopaedic implants. Wear 2004; 256: 805–816.

32.

Kocagöz

Underwood

Sivan

. Does taper angle clearance influence fretting and corrosion damage at the head-stem interface? A matched cohort retrieval study. Semin Arthroplasty 2014; 24: 246–254.

33.

Mroczkowski

Hertzler

Humphrey

. Effect of impact assembly on the fretting corrosion of modular hip tapers. J Orthop Res 2006; 24: 271–279.

34.

Nassutt

Mollenhauer

Klingbeil

. Relevance of the insertion force for the taper lock reliability of a hip stem and a ceramic femoral head. Biomed Tech 2006; 51: 103–109.

35.

Bergmann

Graichen

Rohlmann

. Realistic loads for testing hip implants. Biomed Mater Eng 2010; 20: 65–75.

36.

Jauch

Huber

Sellenschloh

. Micromotions at the taper interface between stem and neck adapter of a bimodular hip prosthesis during activities of daily living. J Orthop Res 2013; 31: 1165–1171.

37.

Gilbert

Mali

Urban

. In vivo oxide-induced stress corrosion cracking of Ti-6Al-4V in a neck-stem modular taper: emergent behavior in a new mechanism of in vivo corrosion. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2011; 100: 584–594.

38.

Wright

Sporer

Urban

. Fracture of a modular femoral neck after total hip arthroplasty – a case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010; 92: 1518–1521.

39.

Jauch

Huber

Haschke

. Low CCD – angles cause higher micromotions at the neck taper junction of bi-modular hip stems. J Biomech 2012; 45: S315.

40.

Damm

Dymke

Ackermann

. Friction in total hip joint prosthesis measured in vivo during walking. PLoS One 2013; 8: e78373.

41.

Goldberg

Gilbert

Jacobs

. A multicenter retrieval study of the taper interfaces of modular hip prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002; 149–161.

42.

Pennock

Schmidt

Bourgeault

CA.

Morse-type tapers: factors that may influence taper strength during total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2002; 17: 773–778.

43.

Gkagkalis

Mettraux

Omoumi

. Adverse tissue reaction to corrosion at the neck-stem junction after modular primary total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2015; 101: 123–126.

44.

Heiney

Battula

Vrabec

. Impact magnitudes applied by surgeons and their importance when applying the femoral head onto the Morse taper for total hip arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2009; 129: 793–796.

45.

Rehmer

Bishop

Morlock

MM.

Influence of assembly procedure and material combination on the strength of the taper connection at the head-neck junction of modular hip endoprostheses. Clin Biomech 2012; 27: 77–83.

46.

Jauch

Coles

. Low torque levels can initiate a removal of the passivation layer and cause fretting in modular hip stems. Med Eng Phys 2014; 36: 1140–1146.

47.

Donaldson

Coburn

Lohmann Siegel

Total hip arthroplasty head-neck contact mechanics: a stochastic investigation of key parameters. J Biomech 2014; 47: 1634–1641.

48.

Shareef

Levine

Effect of manufacturing tolerances on the micromotion at the Morse taper interface in modular hip implants using the finite element technique. Biomaterials 1996; 17: 623–630.

49.

Abdullah

. Study of factors affecting taper joint failures in modular hip implant using finite element modelling. In: Shkelzen

(ed.) Modeling simulation and optimization – focus on applications. Rijeka: InTech, 2010, pp.121–134.

50.

Hussenbocus

Kosuge

Solomon

. Head-neck taper corrosion in hip arthroplasty. Biomed Res Int 2015; 2015: 18–21.

51.

McGrory

MacKenzie

Babikian

A high prevalence of corrosion at the head–neck taper with contemporary Zimmer non-cemented femoral hip components. J Arthroplasty 2015; 30: 1265–1268.

52.

Nassif

Nawabi

Stoner

. Taper design affects failure of large-head metal-on-metal total hip replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014; 472: 564–571.

53.

Higgs

Hanzlik

MacDonald

. Is increased modularity associated with increased fretting and corrosion damage in metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty devices? A retrieval study. J Arthroplasty 2013; 28: 2–6.